Notices
5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.

Long or Short Tube Headers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2/24/17, 12:46 PM
  #1  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
tourer's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 30, 2012
Location: Maine
Posts: 245
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Long or Short Tube Headers

I have a 2013 GT Premium, I have the BBK X-Pipe and the Roush Cat Backs.
Stock Header manifolds and Cats, What aftermarket header should I be looking at? Long or Short Tube?
Old 2/24/17, 01:09 PM
  #2  
THE RED FLASH ------Moderator
 
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 11, 2006
Location: Carnegie, PA
Posts: 9,920
Received 1,987 Likes on 1,611 Posts
Don't waste your time and hard earned money towards short tube headers.. Your OEM exhaust manifolds are very efficient flowing compared to the pre 4.6 3v days prior to 2005.. If your looking for more efficiency and performance over the stock manifolds, your best option is Long Tube Headers..
The following users liked this post:
tourer (2/27/17)
Old 2/24/17, 01:49 PM
  #3  
Bullitt Member
 
Kotenukimen's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 16, 2012
Location: Montreal, Qc
Posts: 210
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
It depends on what you are trying to accomplish. Do you want more low-end torque (shorty) or high-end hp (LTH)? With the shorty you can keep the stock cats, which robs power but is more environment-friendly. With Long tube, you will be removing the cats, so the exhaust sound will be very loud for the Streets, but you will get the most gains for not having the restrictive cats.
The following users liked this post:
tourer (2/27/17)
Old 2/24/17, 03:13 PM
  #4  
THE RED FLASH ------Moderator
 
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 11, 2006
Location: Carnegie, PA
Posts: 9,920
Received 1,987 Likes on 1,611 Posts
Originally Posted by Kotenukimen
It depends on what you are trying to accomplish. Do you want more low-end torque (shorty) or high-end hp (LTH)? With the shorty you can keep the stock cats, which robs power but is more environment-friendly. With Long tube, you will be removing the cats, so the exhaust sound will be very loud for the Streets, but you will get the most gains for not having the restrictive cats.
Wrong ! The stock cats on the 3v 4.6L from 2005-2010 and 2011-14 Coyote 4v 5.0 are low restrictive and far more efficient compared to the older 4.6L 2v SN-95 models..

As for any low end torque gains from shorty headers are concerned, they'll be so minimal in which they won't even be noticeable.. As for Long Tube headers, they're also available with high-flow cats for those who don't want an exhaust sound that's too loud for street applications..

This I know through personal experience, as I swapped out my stock H with cats and upgraded to a Mac high-flow catted prochamber.. The high-flow cats did not improve low end torque over the factory H pipe at all, in fact I actually lost some due to no longer having enough back pressure.. Needless to say I was not pleased with the Mac high-flow cats whatsoever and reinstalled the factory catted mid pipe as a direct result..

Last edited by m05fastbackGT; 2/24/17 at 03:19 PM.
The following users liked this post:
tourer (2/27/17)
Old 2/24/17, 03:39 PM
  #5  
Mach 1 Member
 
Blown CS's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 13, 2014
Location: Indiana
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by m05fastbackGT
Don't waste your time and hard earned money towards short tube headers.. Your OEM exhaust manifolds are very efficient flowing compared to the pre 4.6 3v days prior to 2005.. If your looking for more efficiency and performance over the stock manifolds, your best option is Long Tube Headers..
This. If you're going throw the hassle do LT and if you don't have inspections, do OR h or x pipe.
The following users liked this post:
tourer (2/27/17)
Old 2/24/17, 04:39 PM
  #6  
THE RED FLASH ------Moderator
 
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 11, 2006
Location: Carnegie, PA
Posts: 9,920
Received 1,987 Likes on 1,611 Posts
Originally Posted by Blown CS
This. If you're going throw the hassle do LT and if you don't have inspections, do OR h or x pipe.
This
The following users liked this post:
tourer (2/27/17)
Old 2/24/17, 07:34 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
5.M0NSTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 2, 2013
Location: Little north of Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 3,090
Received 254 Likes on 230 Posts
I'm with Rocky on this one. Honestly, I'm not really sure what the point of shorty headers is on a Coyote. It's a lot of money for not too much gains. Are you after the unique sound and serious power? If so go LT.
The following users liked this post:
tourer (2/27/17)
Old 2/24/17, 09:12 PM
  #8  
THE RED FLASH ------Moderator
 
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 11, 2006
Location: Carnegie, PA
Posts: 9,920
Received 1,987 Likes on 1,611 Posts
Marty ! The OP might be able to squeeze just a few more ponies from perhaps JBA equal length shorty headers, but I wouldn't depend nor expect it
The following users liked this post:
tourer (2/27/17)
Old 2/25/17, 02:06 PM
  #9  
Legacy TMS Member
 
Glenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 7, 2006
Location: In Boredom
Posts: 15,814
Received 777 Likes on 567 Posts
I say Long tube and high flow cats. Mufflers will control the sound. If the roush cat back is to loud try some other mufflers. Just don't go to american muscle for a tune if you do go long tube.
The following users liked this post:
tourer (2/27/17)
Old 2/26/17, 06:57 AM
  #10  
EF1
Mach 1 Member
 
EF1's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 17, 2013
Posts: 830
Received 132 Likes on 118 Posts
How much volume will long tubes and high flow cats add without changing the mufflers?
Old 2/26/17, 03:10 PM
  #11  
THE RED FLASH ------Moderator
 
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 11, 2006
Location: Carnegie, PA
Posts: 9,920
Received 1,987 Likes on 1,611 Posts
It's really difficult to say, as it all boils down to personal preference.. What you think may be too loud, may not be for someone else and so forth.. I can say that high-flow cats are going to provide a louder exhaust note over a factory catted mid-pipe, but I can assure you that a high-flow cat will provide a quieter exhaust tone over an off-road exhaust with no cats at all.. Your most important factor however, is the type of axle backs your going to be running.. As the type of axle back muffler is what affects the loudness of the exhaust more than anything.. Anyway just my $.02

Last edited by m05fastbackGT; 2/26/17 at 03:11 PM.
The following users liked this post:
tourer (2/27/17)
Old 2/26/17, 03:57 PM
  #12  
Super Boss Lawman Member
 
SpectreH's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 5, 2015
Location: Yukon, OK
Posts: 4,320
Received 1,153 Likes on 841 Posts
If I was going to go through the trouble of installing headers, I'd go long tube.
The following users liked this post:
tourer (2/27/17)
Old 2/26/17, 07:46 PM
  #13  
THE RED FLASH ------Moderator
 
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 11, 2006
Location: Carnegie, PA
Posts: 9,920
Received 1,987 Likes on 1,611 Posts
^^^^^^^
The following users liked this post:
tourer (2/27/17)
Old 3/2/17, 01:47 AM
  #14  
Mach 1 Member
 
SGwick's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 3, 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 520
Received 34 Likes on 32 Posts
Depends
Attached Thumbnails Long or Short Tube Headers-photo159.jpg  
The following users liked this post:
tourer (3/3/17)
Old 3/2/17, 01:04 PM
  #15  
THE RED FLASH ------Moderator
 
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 11, 2006
Location: Carnegie, PA
Posts: 9,920
Received 1,987 Likes on 1,611 Posts
Depends on what ! What's your point ???
Old 3/3/17, 02:36 PM
  #16  
Cobra Member
 
boss man's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 14, 2011
Location: NJ. Waiting for our Gov. to be held accountable for his actions>>>Jersey Broke
Posts: 1,072
Received 25 Likes on 20 Posts
My guess is where you want your power band.
Old 3/3/17, 06:14 PM
  #17  
THE RED FLASH ------Moderator
 
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 11, 2006
Location: Carnegie, PA
Posts: 9,920
Received 1,987 Likes on 1,611 Posts
So according to the graphs posted, just where exactly is the power band ? Where are the power number comparisons illustrated anywhere on the graphs, nowhere WTF:
Old 3/10/17, 12:01 PM
  #18  
I Have No Life
 
FromZto5's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 24, 2011
Posts: 10,141
Received 172 Likes on 145 Posts
OP... one word.

Kooks.



And this is the same setup with Magnaflows - no more Corsas.


Last edited by FromZto5; 3/10/17 at 12:05 PM.
The following users liked this post:
tourer (3/13/17)
Old 3/10/17, 11:53 PM
  #19  
THE RED FLASH ------Moderator
 
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 11, 2006
Location: Carnegie, PA
Posts: 9,920
Received 1,987 Likes on 1,611 Posts
Burton ! When you did switch over from Corsa to Magnaflow ? I recall you loved the Corsa's so much because of the design quality and how well known they are for not droning
Old 3/13/17, 07:29 AM
  #20  
I Have No Life
 
FromZto5's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 24, 2011
Posts: 10,141
Received 172 Likes on 145 Posts
Originally Posted by m05fastbackGT
Burton ! When you did switch over from Corsa to Magnaflow ? I recall you loved the Corsa's so much because of the design quality and how well known they are for not droning
hey Rocky! Holy cow, where you been buddy!

I replaced them last year, maybe spring-ish. Why? Because when I got the Kooks stuff, the whole combination of the setup (full free flowing) was amp'd up exponentially. It gave me "unwanted" attention from the popo if I were to get on it. Plus, it got a little tinny/raspy at upper rev's - Not Kooks fault, but because of the combination of my full exhaust now, with headers, etc.

The RTR Magnaflows are the best setup now with what I have. Nice and low and menacing.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:36 PM.