The Mustang Source - Ford Mustang Forums

GT350

Evolution Performance, Inc. - 2016 Shelby GT350 Basline Dyno Numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11/12/15, 01:05 PM
  #1  
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
Rob@Evolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 19, 2014
Location: Aston PA
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Evolution Performance, Inc. - 2016 Shelby GT350 Basline Dyno Numbers
Our 2016 Shelby GT350 with only 110 miles on it hit the rollers.

On 93 Octane it made 447 RWHP and 382 RWTQ 100% Stock on our 1100-SE Mustang Dyno.

The car will be Tuned Exclusively with the Lund Racing nGauge for 93 Octane and also for e85 so stay tuned.
Attached Thumbnails Evolution Performance, Inc. - 2016 Shelby GT350 Basline Dyno Numbers-2016-gt350.jpg  
Rob@Evolution is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11/12/15, 01:34 PM
  #2  
Legacy TMS Member
 
tom281's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 8, 2005
Location: Medina county, OH
Posts: 12,397
Received 28 Likes on 21 Posts
Decent numbers. Like the color combo.
tom281 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11/12/15, 07:23 PM
  #3  
Bullitt Member
 
lime05's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 4, 2012
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Subscribed. Can't wait to see some videos
lime05 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11/13/15, 10:26 AM
  #4  
Cobra R Member
 
1 Alibi 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 2, 2012
Location: Hackettstown, N.J.
Posts: 1,550
Received 684 Likes on 347 Posts
Nice baseline, what are the mod plans ??
.
1 Alibi 2 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11/13/15, 01:01 PM
  #5  
Cobra Member
 
HizliBullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 11, 2009
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by 1 Alibi 2
Nice baseline, what are the mod plans ??
.
if that engine is similar to the coyote 5.0, where did they make it the extra .2 from? just wider valves?
HizliBullet is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11/13/15, 01:13 PM
  #6  
Like Father...
I ♥ Sausage
 
Rather B.Blown's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 4, 2007
Location: Just outside the middle of nowhere
Posts: 20,259
Received 592 Likes on 425 Posts
Originally Posted by HizliBullet
if that engine is similar to the coyote 5.0, where did they make it the extra .2 from? just wider valves?
Valves have nothing to do with displacement, the size of the bore X stroke X number of cylinders = displacement.
Rather B.Blown is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11/13/15, 01:32 PM
  #7  
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
Rob@Evolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 19, 2014
Location: Aston PA
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now that the baseline is done we are hard at work doing the R&D for the build. I will update as the build progresses.
Rob@Evolution is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11/13/15, 05:10 PM
  #8  
Bullitt Member
 
SplitSecond's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 21, 2014
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Definitely in for updates!
SplitSecond is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11/13/15, 10:37 PM
  #9  
Cobra Member
 
HizliBullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 11, 2009
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Rather B.Blown

Valves have nothing to do with displacement, the size of the bore X stroke X number of cylinders = displacement.
That explains the 12:1 ratio compared to 11:1 on coyote
HizliBullet is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11/13/15, 10:54 PM
  #10  
Like Father...
I ♥ Sausage
 
Rather B.Blown's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 4, 2007
Location: Just outside the middle of nowhere
Posts: 20,259
Received 592 Likes on 425 Posts
Originally Posted by HizliBullet
That explains the 12:1 ratio compared to 11:1 on coyote
Well, not really. Compression ratio is determined mostly by the size of the dome (or lack thereof) on the piston top and the size of the combustion chamber of the head.
Rather B.Blown is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11/14/15, 07:25 AM
  #11  
Cobra R Member
 
1 Alibi 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 2, 2012
Location: Hackettstown, N.J.
Posts: 1,550
Received 684 Likes on 347 Posts
Originally Posted by Rob@Evolution
Now that the baseline is done we are hard at work doing the R&D for the build. I will update as the build progresses.
.
How about a hint, blower or turbo(s) ?
.
1 Alibi 2 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11/14/15, 08:06 AM
  #12  
V6 Member
 
GT_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 28, 2015
Location: Northern Ill-noise
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by HizliBullet
if that engine is similar to the coyote 5.0, where did they make it the extra .2 from? just wider valves?
The configuration is similar to the coyote, not the construction. The voodoo engine does not have cast cylinder liners, it has ceramic sprayed liners which allows a larger bore and the valve position to move for larger valves. This spray liner technology Ford brought inside their engine plant for this engine. Previous Shelby versions had the spray liner blocks done outside their plant by other sources.
The Coyote engine is 92.2mm bore, 92.7mm stroke
The Voodoo engine is 94mm bore, 93mm stroke
Last edited by GT_Dave; 11/14/15 at 08:19 AM.
GT_Dave is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11/16/15, 07:58 AM
  #13  
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
Rob@Evolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 19, 2014
Location: Aston PA
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Our 2016 Shelby GT350 ran a 11.96 @ 116mph with 325/30R19 Mickey Thompson Performance Tires & Wheels ET Street S/S Radials and BMR Suspension Inc.. The car ran this number with the stock tune and on 93 Octane and is the first GT350 in the 11's. ‪#‎Shelby‬ ‪#‎GT350‬ ‪#‎Ford‬ #‎evolutionperformance
Attached Images  
Rob@Evolution is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11/16/15, 09:15 AM
  #14  
Former Vendor
 
Chad@Amp'D's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 7, 2015
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nice run!
Chad@Amp'D is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11/16/15, 09:23 AM
  #15  
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
Rob@Evolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 19, 2014
Location: Aston PA
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chad@Amp'D
Nice run!
Thanks ... Would have had been better but the track prep wasn't at its best.
Rob@Evolution is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11/16/15, 10:10 AM
  #16  
Cobra Member
 
Jazzman442's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 7, 2014
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 25 Posts
How does this compare to the 2016 Mustang GT and the 2014 GT? Just curious since the 2014 is Quicker than the 2016?
Jazzman442 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11/23/15, 01:47 PM
  #17  
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
Rob@Evolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 19, 2014
Location: Aston PA
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New Best in our 2016 Shelby GT350 - 11.76@118MPH! The car weighed 4,025lbs with Driver.
Attached Thumbnails Evolution Performance, Inc. - 2016 Shelby GT350 Basline Dyno Numbers-gt350-time-slip-2.jpg   Evolution Performance, Inc. - 2016 Shelby GT350 Basline Dyno Numbers-gt350-scale.jpg  
Rob@Evolution is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11/23/15, 04:12 PM
  #18  
2013 RR Boss 302 #2342
 
Mustang Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 6, 2012
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 11,668
Likes: 0
Received 2,174 Likes on 1,621 Posts
That's not even the 'R' version. With less weight it should be even quicker. :-)
Mustang Freak is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11/23/15, 06:15 PM
  #19  
Bullitt Member
 
orng302's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 24, 2011
Posts: 349
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you need a lighter driver?
orng302 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11/24/15, 10:08 AM
  #20  
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
Rob@Evolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 19, 2014
Location: Aston PA
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by orng302
I think you need a lighter driver?
w\o driver it would be around 3850.
Rob@Evolution is offline  
Reply Like



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: Evolution Performance, Inc. - 2016 Shelby GT350 Basline Dyno Numbers


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:43 PM.