New EcoBoost Mustang gets beaten by S-197 V6 on drag strip
10/13/14, 05:01 PM
#1
TMS Staff
Thread Starter
New EcoBoost Mustang gets beaten by S-197 V6 on drag strip
The latest test for the EcoBoost comes from the guys over at American Muscle who posted a video putting an automatic model of the turbocharged four-banger up against a manual model. They even ran the automatic 2.3 against a 2014 V6 Mustang. While the stick took the win in the EcoBoost vs. EcoBoost showdown, the automatic EcoBoost proved to be no match for the S-197 ... that is, unless you compare its first race's ET with the V6's ET.
Read the rest on the Mustang Source homepage. >>
10/13/14, 06:02 PM
#2
Banned
Join Date: August 2, 2013
Location: Little north of Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 3,090
Received 254 Likes
on
230 Posts
Let's not forget that the V6 S197 was AUTO. You can't compare EB Manual vs V6 Auto, that would be 
And just for the record, a decent run for a V6 Maual is 13.7. So either way EB loses.
And just for the record, a decent run for a V6 Maual is 13.7. So either way EB loses.
10/13/14, 07:25 PM
#3
Spam Connoisseur
I got هَبوبed
I got هَبوبed
Join Date: September 8, 2009
Location: Sun City AZ
Posts: 9,703
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Who was expecting a stock for stock show down to play out differently?
Now tune for tune and part for part will go differently.
I would think it to be better for the Ecoboost motor to have more miles on it to do the test. If the 2.3eb motor is anything like the 2.0eb it need times to loosen up since its incredibility tight from the factory.
Now tune for tune and part for part will go differently.
I would think it to be better for the Ecoboost motor to have more miles on it to do the test. If the 2.3eb motor is anything like the 2.0eb it need times to loosen up since its incredibility tight from the factory.
10/13/14, 07:54 PM
#4
Post *****
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
They even ran the automatic 2.3 against a 2014 V6 Mustang. While the stick took the win in the EcoBoost vs. EcoBoost showdown, the automatic EcoBoost proved to be no match for the S-197 … that is, unless you compare its first race’s ET with the V6′s ET. The slushbox EcoBoost’s best time was 14.36 @ 97.4 mph. The V6 S-197 turned in a 14.57 @ 97.5, so it’s not an all-out victory for the old S-197.
For comparison’s sake, the manual EcoBoost served up an impressive 13.89 @ 103.0 mph.
Last edited by cdynaco; 10/14/14 at 02:53 AM.
10/17/14, 06:22 AM
#6
Cobra Member
I can burnout 1st... can chrip 2,3,4th gear on the highway. Lots of more power in the manual transmission in the V6 over the auto.
Having the 3.31 gears over the stock 2.73 gears in the demo probably helps a lot as well.
10/18/14, 06:19 AM
#7
legacy Tms Member MEMORIAL Rest In Peace 10/06/2021
Join Date: September 16, 2009
Location: Clinton Tennessee
Posts: 3,377
Received 124 Likes
on
100 Posts
With a 'tune' the automatic is a lot better. I can burnout 1st gear and get a nice bark in second gear and 'sometimes' a chirp in third. Just saying......
10/31/14, 11:02 PM
#8
A tune will fix that...mid 12's with the EB and only a tune and DR's!
http://www.mustang6g.com/forums/show...k-vs-4702.html
http://www.mustang6g.com/forums/show...k-vs-4702.html
Last edited by Stinger; 10/31/14 at 11:11 PM.
11/1/14, 07:02 AM
#9
Legacy TMS Member
The title of this thread is so WRONG ... from the linked article:
"The slushbox EcoBoost’s best time was 14.36 @ 97.4 mph. The V6 S-197 turned in a 14.57 @ 97.5, so it’s not an all-out victory for the old S-197.
For comparison’s sake, the manual EcoBoost served up an impressive 13.89 @ 103.0 mph"
So the EcoBoost was quicker in both tests ... how is that "New EcoBoost Mustang gets beaten by S-197 V6 on drag strip" ????
"The slushbox EcoBoost’s best time was 14.36 @ 97.4 mph. The V6 S-197 turned in a 14.57 @ 97.5, so it’s not an all-out victory for the old S-197.
For comparison’s sake, the manual EcoBoost served up an impressive 13.89 @ 103.0 mph"
So the EcoBoost was quicker in both tests ... how is that "New EcoBoost Mustang gets beaten by S-197 V6 on drag strip" ????
11/1/14, 10:03 PM
#10
The title of this thread is so WRONG ... from the linked article:
"The slushbox EcoBoost’s best time was 14.36 @ 97.4 mph. The V6 S-197 turned in a 14.57 @ 97.5, so it’s not an all-out victory for the old S-197.
For comparison’s sake, the manual EcoBoost served up an impressive 13.89 @ 103.0 mph"
So the EcoBoost was quicker in both tests ... how is that "New EcoBoost Mustang gets beaten by S-197 V6 on drag strip" ????
"The slushbox EcoBoost’s best time was 14.36 @ 97.4 mph. The V6 S-197 turned in a 14.57 @ 97.5, so it’s not an all-out victory for the old S-197.
For comparison’s sake, the manual EcoBoost served up an impressive 13.89 @ 103.0 mph"
So the EcoBoost was quicker in both tests ... how is that "New EcoBoost Mustang gets beaten by S-197 V6 on drag strip" ????
11/2/14, 05:58 AM
#12
Legacy TMS Member
11/3/14, 10:14 AM
#14
Banned
Join Date: August 2, 2013
Location: Little north of Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 3,090
Received 254 Likes
on
230 Posts
The title of this thread is so WRONG ... from the linked article:
"The slushbox EcoBoost’s best time was 14.36 @ 97.4 mph. The V6 S-197 turned in a 14.57 @ 97.5, so it’s not an all-out victory for the old S-197.
For comparison’s sake, the manual EcoBoost served up an impressive 13.89 @ 103.0 mph"
So the EcoBoost was quicker in both tests ... how is that "New EcoBoost Mustang gets beaten by S-197 V6 on drag strip" ????
"The slushbox EcoBoost’s best time was 14.36 @ 97.4 mph. The V6 S-197 turned in a 14.57 @ 97.5, so it’s not an all-out victory for the old S-197.
For comparison’s sake, the manual EcoBoost served up an impressive 13.89 @ 103.0 mph"
So the EcoBoost was quicker in both tests ... how is that "New EcoBoost Mustang gets beaten by S-197 V6 on drag strip" ????
There was no manual V6 vs Manual EB. At least not in this comparo. But some publications out there have a 2013 Manual V6 doing a quarter in 13.7. Almost 0.2s better than the EB car.
Last edited by 5.M0NSTER; 11/3/14 at 10:23 AM.
11/3/14, 04:47 PM
#15
Legacy TMS Member
Gabe, this test was a AUTO Eco versus AUTO V6. The auto V6 smoked the EB. This was based on AM comparison video they posted.
There was no manual V6 vs Manual EB. At least not in this comparo. But some publications out there have a 2013 Manual V6 doing a quarter in 13.7. Almost 0.2s better than the EB car.
There was no manual V6 vs Manual EB. At least not in this comparo. But some publications out there have a 2013 Manual V6 doing a quarter in 13.7. Almost 0.2s better than the EB car.
"The slushbox EcoBoost’s best time was 14.36 @ 97.4 mph. The V6 S-197 turned in a 14.57 @ 97.5, so it’s not an all-out victory for the old S-197.
For comparison’s sake, the manual EcoBoost served up an impressive 13.89 @ 103.0 mph"
Now, slushbox means auto, right?
And with the auto Ecoboost doing the 1/4 in 14.36 and the auto V6 doing it in 14.57, how is the Ecoboost slower?
11/3/14, 06:33 PM
#16
Banned
Join Date: August 2, 2013
Location: Little north of Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 3,090
Received 254 Likes
on
230 Posts
I'll quote it again:
"The slushbox EcoBoost’s best time was 14.36 @ 97.4 mph. The V6 S-197 turned in a 14.57 @ 97.5, so it’s not an all-out victory for the old S-197.
For comparison’s sake, the manual EcoBoost served up an impressive 13.89 @ 103.0 mph"
Now, slushbox means auto, right?
And with the auto Ecoboost doing the 1/4 in 14.36 and the auto V6 doing it in 14.57, how is the Ecoboost slower?
"The slushbox EcoBoost’s best time was 14.36 @ 97.4 mph. The V6 S-197 turned in a 14.57 @ 97.5, so it’s not an all-out victory for the old S-197.
For comparison’s sake, the manual EcoBoost served up an impressive 13.89 @ 103.0 mph"
Now, slushbox means auto, right?
And with the auto Ecoboost doing the 1/4 in 14.36 and the auto V6 doing it in 14.57, how is the Ecoboost slower?
Anyway, here is the video:
11/3/14, 06:46 PM
#17
Legacy TMS Member
I know. Verbiage is confusing. I think the EBs had multiple runs, and the V6 only had one. And in that one run it beat the EB...
Anyway, here is the video:
2015 Mustang EcoBoost Stock 1/4 Mile vs. 2014 Mustang V6 Drag Race by AmericanMuscle.com - YouTube
Anyway, here is the video:
2015 Mustang EcoBoost Stock 1/4 Mile vs. 2014 Mustang V6 Drag Race by AmericanMuscle.com - YouTube
Also, Livernois ran 13.89 with a stock auto EB before they threw drag radials and a tune on it for a sweet 12.6 .... something that the V6 will never deliver with such slight mods
11/3/14, 07:18 PM
#18
Banned
Join Date: August 2, 2013
Location: Little north of Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 3,090
Received 254 Likes
on
230 Posts
So head-to-head the EB lost to the older V6, but the EB had the overall lower time of the night.
Also, Livernois ran 13.89 with a stock auto EB before they threw drag radials and a tune on it for a sweet 12.6 .... something that the V6 will never deliver with such slight mods
Also, Livernois ran 13.89 with a stock auto EB before they threw drag radials and a tune on it for a sweet 12.6 .... something that the V6 will never deliver with such slight mods
It just sucks that you have to void your warranty to unlock it. Most owners don't mod their cars, so a stock V6 will outperform a stock EB. MT ran a stock V6 at 13.7.
11/4/14, 06:54 AM
#19
Bullitt Member
Join Date: July 3, 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You don't necessarily void your warranty with mods or tunes.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
