Ecoboost

EcoBoost Confirmed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11/3/11, 07:21 PM
  #21  
BOSS Member
 
LagunaBeach's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 21, 2010
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ShaneGT
Thing you have to relize with the 3.5. ecoboost.. yes its only 365hp, but has 425trq in the f-150 version, so wont be hard to tweek it for more power.

The major downfall of ALL ecoboost engines right now is the ECU us encrypted and no one has cracked it yet... so not very mod friendly
ALL Ecoboost are encrypted? Have you seen all the 12sec SHO's and 13sec Flex's with only a tune? Only the F150's have encrypted PCM's.
Old 11/3/11, 11:04 PM
  #22  
Member
 
Ali 556's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 7, 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LagunaBeach
ALL Ecoboost are encrypted? Have you seen all the 12sec SHO's and 13sec Flex's with only a tune? Only the F150's have encrypted PCM's.
mmmm NO !!!!,

fastlane in TX made more than 90whp gain on 2011 f-150 with only tune and down pipes, see here,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfttliA1L9w


Sory but got owned
Old 11/4/11, 08:19 AM
  #23  
BOSS Member
 
LagunaBeach's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 21, 2010
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ali 556
mmmm NO !!!!,

fastlane in TX made more than 90whp gain on 2011 f-150 with only tune and down pipes, see here,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfttliA1L9w


Sory but got owned
Listen here hot shot, know your facts before you start spewing BS you know nothing about.

1. The F150 PCM is encrypted, that doesn't mean it can't be cracked.
2. Fastlane didn't crack the encryption, it's in inline device that alters the tune AFTER the PCM.
3. If you're going to call someone out that they got "owned", learn how to spell.

This post is the definition of "owned", so suck it! Go back to bed, rookie.
Old 11/4/11, 08:26 AM
  #24  
Post *****
 
2k7gtcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,753
Received 159 Likes on 133 Posts
The major downfall of the Ecoboost engines for aftermarket tunes is the fuel delivery system for the direct injection. It's not like it is on the Mustang. Some people have added boost a pumps but its not really doing anything. There is no bigger Cobra fuel pump to put in. From what little I understand there is a super high pressure pump or something at the motor for the direct injection. It is limited in size and there is no replacement. There is no current aftermarket part to increase fuel flow at the motor. Until the injector/pump issue is resolved they are limited in what they can do before fuel starvation and knocking.
Old 11/4/11, 08:50 AM
  #25  
Mach 1 Member
 
908ssp's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 16, 2010
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
You could always add fuel up stream of the valves. We have been doing that for 20 years.
Old 11/4/11, 10:45 AM
  #26  
BOSS Member
 
LagunaBeach's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 21, 2010
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 908ssp
You could always add fuel up stream of the valves. We have been doing that for 20 years.
What? And how would that be done on a DI engine with a high pressure pump and dry intake?
Old 11/4/11, 10:52 AM
  #27  
Post *****
 
2k7gtcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,753
Received 159 Likes on 133 Posts
That high pressure pump is at 800 psi!!!

There is currently no aftermarket replacement for the one used in Fords.

Other cars have aftermarket ones, but as of now none for the Ford Ecoboost.
Old 11/4/11, 10:39 PM
  #28  
Mach 1 Member
 
908ssp's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 16, 2010
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by LagunaBeach
What? And how would that be done on a DI engine with a high pressure pump and dry intake?
Make it a wet intake. Not something you buy off the shelf but not that hard to do. 20 years ago we added electronic fuel injection to Porsche when we up the boost using primitive boost controllers. The systems were totally self contained did require any interface with the stock system except an added injector port.
Old 11/5/11, 12:36 AM
  #29  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by RandyW
How about an EcoBoost V6 in a new Mach 1? In the early 70's the Mach 1 had twin hood scoops, so you could make a hood that pays homage to that style and the scoops could actually be functional.
NO!

Save the EcoBoost stuff for something appropriate like an SVO Mustang. If anything a next gen Mach should get something cool like a N/A tall deck road-runner 5.8 (which would be around 500hp anyways)
Old 11/5/11, 07:52 AM
  #30  
BOSS Member
 
LagunaBeach's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 21, 2010
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 908ssp
Make it a wet intake. Not something you buy off the shelf but not that hard to do. 20 years ago we added electronic fuel injection to Porsche when we up the boost using primitive boost controllers. The systems were totally self contained did require any interface with the stock system except an added injector port.
I think it would be a lot more complicated than that. Where is this extra fuel coming from? Another fuel pump and associated plumbing with additional injectors? How would you control fuel flow in relation to boost? You make it a wet intake and it disrupts the spray pattern of the factory injectors that is coming in at 2150psi. It might not seem that big of a deal but modern engines rely heavily on things like that for maximum performance.

Someone will come out with an upgraded DI fuel pump and injectors eventually, so all that won't be necessary. There are SHO's solidly in the 12's with the factory fuel system which is about 450HP. Nobody really knows the weak link in those engines/drivetrain but I'm sure it will be found soon enough. There is a psychical power limit with them and I think the current fuel system is sized correctly in relation to the rest of the parts.
Old 11/5/11, 11:23 AM
  #31  
GTR Member
 
Overboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From my experiences with the DI tuning (2.3 DISI turbo in a Mazdaspeed6), there are a lot of factors that people are still learning about in tuning them. People tried everything, from methanol injection, tuning, intake/turbo setups, but it seemed like the CDFP and stock fuel system had problems around 425hp. Things started to fail, like injector seals. As they dug deeper in the ECU, they found other load/fuel tables that would create a theoretical "max" sum value that couldn't be exceeded by some complex algorithm. They found that the injector pulse width couldn't be modified, at least initially.

Trust me, there's more to go with the DI turbo motors, but for now, let's keep them out of the Mustang until they really understand them. If they choose to bring the SVO back, I'm all for a nod back to the old car, but don't get too carried away. A 310-325hp I4 turbo would be a wicked little motor in a 3200 lb. car. Wishful thinking, but not impossible.
Old 11/5/11, 12:31 PM
  #32  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Moosetang's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sorry, but I can't get behind the idea of keeping the EB motors out of the Mustang because they're harder to mod. There's a 5.0 and soon a 5.8 to mod, buy those. People who aren't great mechanics or don't have the scratch to tinker with will love the stock EB.
Old 11/6/11, 06:55 PM
  #33  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
I'm sure if the EB motors show up in Mustang they will be mod friendly even if the warranty isn't. Ford knows how important the aftermarket is to the Mustang's success.
Old 1/10/12, 07:49 AM
  #34  
Team Mustang Source
 
Topnotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 31, 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
EcoBoost Confirmed

http://www.autoweek.com/article/2012...ROIT/120109853
Old 1/10/12, 07:54 AM
  #35  
Bullitt Member
 
rodriguez256's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 28, 2007
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wonder which engine? And how that'll affect the 5.0s h.p.?
Old 1/10/12, 08:18 AM
  #36  
Bear Eats King...
Bear ****s Bone
 
texastboneking's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 5, 2011
Location: Cleburne, Tx
Posts: 5,302
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by rodriguez256
Wonder which engine? And how that'll affect the 5.0s h.p.?
From what I've been hearing here it's the 4 Banger Turbo. Not the v6. They are soposidly shooting for high mpgs. That's the rumor around here anyways.
Old 1/10/12, 08:20 AM
  #37  
Calgon Take Me Away!
 
lalayla's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 1, 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,829
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by texastboneking

From what I've been hearing here it's the 4 Banger Turbo. Not the v6. They are soposidly shooting for high mpgs. That's the rumor around here anyways.
That's what I heard too. SVO style.
Old 1/10/12, 08:43 AM
  #38  
Team Mustang Source
 
Topnotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 31, 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
There's a 2.7 EcoBoost V6 coming...maybe to replace the 3.7 base Mustang...has to have at least 350HP to go against the Genesis w/347 now... The 3.7 block is been utilized in many platforms so a reprieve would make sense.
Old 1/10/12, 10:18 AM
  #39  
I Have No Life
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 10,445
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Wouldn't be surprised to see the 4. Power and fuel economy for the base vehicle.

Leaves room for the 8s to go wild
Old 1/10/12, 10:19 AM
  #40  
GTR Member
 
Overboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I wouldn't call it confirmed yet, but heavily hinted at. It doesn't need the same power as the Genesis coupe if it has the weight advantage. Something in the realm of 300hp would be a very quick car if it had 2-300 lbs. less weight. Not to mention, if it is a 4-cylinder, the weight distribution advantages are going to help the car even more.


Quick Reply: EcoBoost Confirmed



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:11 AM.