2012-2013 BOSS 302

Recommended Fuel 92 octane - I hope it's tuned for E10

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 07:22 AM
  #1  
cloud9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: November 20, 2010
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 1
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Recommended Fuel 92 octane - I hope it's tuned for E10

I was perusing the technical specs and Ford is recommending at least 92 octane for the Boss. I haven't seen an octane requirement this high before. Is that the same for the 2011 5.0 or GT500? My 07 was 91 with the factory tune of course.

I'm optimistic that maybe Ford tuned this a little more aggressively from the factory. I just hope it's tuned for E10 as it's hard to find 92 without it around here. There are a few stations with 93 E10 and only one with straight 93. I guess once we get it on they dyno we can see what the A/F looks like, but E10 will lean it out some.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 08:39 AM
  #2  
5 DOT 0's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: December 18, 2010
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Only 91 octane available here in CA.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 11:55 AM
  #3  
cloud9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: November 20, 2010
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 1
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Originally Posted by 5 DOT 0
Only 91 octane available here in CA.
Yikes. I wonder if there are knock sensors on this motor? Might need to run some Torco out there. I'm just going off the tech specs from Ford for their recommended fuel.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 01:22 PM
  #4  
Tony Alonso's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: February 8, 2004
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 7
From: Cincinnati, OH
Which document are you looking at? The one I have says 91 octane, and two magazine articles I checked a bit ago also said 91 octane.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 01:30 PM
  #5  
mach1fever's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 28, 2004
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
It wouldn't make since for the boss to be over 91 since 93 isn't available everywhere and they couldn't sell cars in California. The LS might be there because it was really designed for the track and I think its probably an adaptive spark set up that senses octane level. Kind of like the gt and bullitt cars. For optimum performance use..... etc.

Respectfully,

Roger
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 02:05 PM
  #6  
jjurgens's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: November 2, 2010
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Alaska
The info Ford has on the data sheets for both models are 92, CA has 91, you are up on us. Alaska has only 90, so I see mixing some Torco all the time! I tried to point out at times, that a large number of new cars and motorcycles require 91 or 92 or void the warranty and are braking the EPA law! The dealers here do not talk about that! Also the EPA could arrest you for not using the right octane??? They tried to give a person a 2 year federal prison sentance for plugging in a tuner once on a 03 Cobra that the car service personal saw and reported. I am not worried about it, just will add torco as needed and use the RED KEY.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 02:37 PM
  #7  
cloud9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: November 20, 2010
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 1
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Here it is right from the spec sheet:
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
2012_Mustang_Boss_Specs.pdf (36.7 KB, 281 views)
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 02:47 PM
  #8  
5 DOT 0's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: December 18, 2010
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Those are dated specs since it still says 440 hp. Let's hope the octane rating got changed.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 02:51 PM
  #9  
cloud9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: November 20, 2010
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 1
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Originally Posted by 5 DOT 0
Those are dated specs since it still says 440 hp. Let's hope the octane rating got changed.
I don't believe it has changed. The stated (est.) peak horsepower rating is still 440 hp from everything I've read. The TracKey (est.) peak horsepower rating is 444 hp.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 03:01 PM
  #10  
5 DOT 0's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: December 18, 2010
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by cloud9
I don't believe it has changed. The stated (est.) peak horsepower rating is still 440 hp from everything I've read. The TracKey (est.) peak horsepower rating is 444 hp.
Check your order guide, the car was certified at 444 hp without the TracKey.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 03:10 PM
  #11  
cloud9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: November 20, 2010
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 1
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Originally Posted by 5 DOT 0
Check your order guide, the car was certified at 444 hp without the TracKey.
Ok. I think I see that now. The more I've read about Trackey the less I think they are telling us. Now it really makes you wonder if peak hp is changed when I look at the types of changes they make to the tune. I hope there's more info forthcoming on this after the 1st of the year. It seems like a Christmas present they aren't letting us open just yet.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 03:35 PM
  #12  
5 DOT 0's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: December 18, 2010
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
It's noted on page 1 and 19 on the order guide. Page 19 shows the gas mileage etc. You got a 1% increase in hp before applying any mods. Merry Christmas. So far the official word on TracKey is no incrase in hp. I find this disappointing but the increased torque curve should translate into quicker times.

Last edited by 5 DOT 0; Dec 23, 2010 at 03:51 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 05:10 PM
  #13  
Tony Alonso's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: February 8, 2004
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 7
From: Cincinnati, OH
The copy of the spec sheet I have shows 91 octane
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
2012_Mustang_Boss_Specs.pdf (54.1 KB, 274 views)
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 05:23 PM
  #14  
Everett's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 14, 2010
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
From: saskatoon
Well my 2000 gt has knock sensors and will retard timing when a knock is sensed....I think there are 2 or 3 on mine....and you will be fine running ethanol polluted fuel in that sweet ride of yours as long as the octane Rating on fuel is appropriate
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 05:30 PM
  #15  
Dave07997S's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 23, 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
This isn't a big deal..BMW M3s along with 997s require 93 octane for rated hp. If you run less than the recommended octane, the knock sensors will dial back timing. This is the case for the Boss as well.

Dave

Last edited by Dave07997S; Dec 24, 2010 at 01:47 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 05:32 PM
  #16  
jjurgens's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: November 2, 2010
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Alaska
That is what I am counting on. Knock sensors will kick in and pull some timing if it really needs it. I think that is why there are two seperate HP ratings on the GT's 5.0, 91 and 87 gas. The Boss should be the same adjustments as needed. I would not want to push it though.

Last edited by jjurgens; Dec 23, 2010 at 05:34 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 10:51 PM
  #17  
2012YellowBoss's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: December 3, 2010
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 3
http://pure-gas.org/index.jsp?stateprov=FL

This has been a question of mine. I am planning to run pure gas at 90 since there are only 4 stations close to me that sell 100% gas. All carry only 90. I figure 90 is better than 91 with E10. Any opinions?
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2010 | 11:47 AM
  #18  
cloud9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: November 20, 2010
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 1
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Originally Posted by Dave07997S
This isn't a big deal..BMW M3s along with 997s require 93 octane for rated hp, if you run less than the knock sensors will dial back timing. This is the case for the Boss as well.

Dave
Good to know. I had posted an earlier thread about knock sensors but didn't get a response. I wish we had them in the 07-09 GT500s. If I understand correctly they were added in 2010+.

Last edited by cloud9; Dec 24, 2010 at 11:47 AM. Reason: spelling
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2010 | 09:28 AM
  #19  
PTRocks's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: July 1, 2008
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 0
From: Oxford, UK
Originally Posted by cloud9
Good to know. I had posted an earlier thread about knock sensors but didn't get a response. I wish we had them in the 07-09 GT500s. If I understand correctly they were added in 2010+.
Knock sensors have been standard in most if not all EFI engines since the 80's. What is very different about the new 5.0 and the 3.7 is the way the ECU controls the spark advance. Previously the advance was set according to a look-up table, with the timing getting retarded if the knock sensor detected pre-ignition. The new ECU now continually sets maximum timing using the knock sensor as an input.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2010 | 09:39 AM
  #20  
cloud9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: November 20, 2010
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 1
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Originally Posted by PTRocks
Knock sensors have been standard in most if not all EFI engines since the 80's. What is very different about the new 5.0 and the 3.7 is the way the ECU controls the spark advance. Previously the advance was set according to a look-up table, with the timing getting retarded if the knock sensor detected pre-ignition. The new ECU now continually sets maximum timing using the knock sensor as an input.
Thanks for the clarificaition
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:33 AM.