2013 mustang
2013 mustang
Has anyone noticed the stance of the 2013 gt mustang? Both wheels seem to be positioned the same.
I have always paid close attention to cars in regards to how proportion the wheels sit underneath the fenders. With the Boss the rear sits a little higher than the front. It is pretty common that the BMW's wheels are positioned very close almost tucked under the fenders.
Is there a reason why one is different than the other when they are both track cars?
I have always paid close attention to cars in regards to how proportion the wheels sit underneath the fenders. With the Boss the rear sits a little higher than the front. It is pretty common that the BMW's wheels are positioned very close almost tucked under the fenders.
Is there a reason why one is different than the other when they are both track cars?
Originally Posted by badasbullitt
Has anyone noticed the stance of the 2013 gt mustang? Both wheels seem to be positioned the same.
I have always paid close attention to cars in regards to how proportion the wheels sit underneath the fenders. With the Boss the rear sits a little higher than the front. It is pretty common that the BMW's wheels are positioned very close almost tucked under the fenders.
Is there a reason why one is different than the other when they are both track cars?
I have always paid close attention to cars in regards to how proportion the wheels sit underneath the fenders. With the Boss the rear sits a little higher than the front. It is pretty common that the BMW's wheels are positioned very close almost tucked under the fenders.
Is there a reason why one is different than the other when they are both track cars?
What is SRA? I guess what I am asking is that I think seeing a car sit lower to it's wheels has a performance look about it. I was kind of shocked to see that Ford decided to lower the 2013 mustang or maybe it just looks that way. I hope that makes more sense.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




