2012 SCCA Solo Nationals - Lincoln, NE
#2
V6 Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: November 24, 2010
Location: West Des Moines
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe its just my phone, but these pictures are tiny.
All is well if viewed with browser. Nevermind.
All is well if viewed with browser. Nevermind.
Last edited by Renesis05; 9/4/12 at 02:18 PM.
#3
GT Member
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes very hot and the tires are not liking it. Fast runs for most came on the first runs. Still a great battle from 2nd though 11th and then another from 12th through 17th. A complete mix of cars with 33 Drivers.
Dave
Dave
#10
Bullitt Member
Join Date: July 4, 2011
Location: Parker, Colorado
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#11
Member
Join Date: September 28, 2011
Location: Vorshlag - Dallas, TX
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not made in 18x11 or 18x12. The D-Force are a good square setup, but square setups stop at 18x10. And they were perfect for the Street-Tire class we were running before. But ESP doesn't restrain tire sizes like ST does. And iff you are running a 315 Hoosier (like we are) you need an 11" or wider wheel.
#12
Member
Join Date: September 28, 2011
Location: Vorshlag - Dallas, TX
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When are not rules constrained and we build them from scratch, they are much stronger. Here's Brianne Corn standing on the front splitter we built for her Pikes Peak competition car.
And a previous shot before the bumper was finished.
#13
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
Join Date: December 18, 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not made in 18x11 or 18x12. The D-Force are a good square setup, but square setups stop at 18x10. And they were perfect for the Street-Tire class we were running before. But ESP doesn't restrain tire sizes like ST does. And iff you are running a 315 Hoosier (like we are) you need an 11" or wider wheel.
#15
GT Member
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Terry drove well today. I did ok considering the car would not put power to the ground on corner exit. I had to peddle it most everywhere especially during the Pro Solo Finale. Maintained 7th out of 9 trophy positions. 5th to 7th positions were only .060 apart. Notice a 2007 4.6L smoked us all, baring Mark. I'm more convinced now that the newer S197 chassis will never be able to overcome it's heavy weight even with the extra 100 whp. Me thinks the older chassis is the Mustang to have in Solo. I'll be dropping 120 lbs. by next season to help lesson the deficit.
Dave
Dave
Last edited by iDrive; 9/5/12 at 09:28 PM.
#16
Bullitt Member
Join Date: January 16, 2011
Location: Norcal, SF Bay Area
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
can you explain the difference between early S197 and newer ones?
I ask because I'm really struggling with taking by boss to the 'next level' and using it as a serious track car...what I'm reading about consumables, heat, and braking capabilities, in particular.
and I'm seeing the advent of 'spec mustang' scca out here on the west coast...based on the 4.6-based cars.
so what do we know about how much and where that weight is?
and I'm seeing the advent of 'spec mustang' scca out here on the west coast...based on the 4.6-based cars.
so what do we know about how much and where that weight is?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post