2012-2013 BOSS 302

2012 Mustang BOSS VS 2011 Corvette Grand Sport

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 20, 2011 | 08:17 PM
  #21  
2k7gtcs's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,808
Likes: 163
I have too much hair on my head to buy a Vette.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2011 | 08:18 PM
  #22  
1 COBRA's Avatar
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 7,738
Likes: 361
From: U S A
Originally Posted by Big Vito
Even at $48,950 I won't buy a vette
Really? How about a ZR1?
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2011 | 08:20 PM
  #23  
5 DOT 0's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: December 18, 2010
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by 1 BULLITT
Really? How about a ZR1?
For that amount I'd go Porsche GT3 RS just to be different.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2011 | 08:21 PM
  #24  
Big Vito's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: January 4, 2011
Posts: 1,811
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 1 BULLITT
Really? How about a ZR1?
Not even a ZR1, but I would love to see them selling at that price
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2011 | 08:21 PM
  #25  
Big Vito's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: January 4, 2011
Posts: 1,811
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 5 DOT 0
For that amount I'd go Porsche GT3 RS just to be different.
This
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2011 | 08:23 PM
  #26  
5 DOT 0's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: December 18, 2010
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by Big Vito
Not even a ZR1, but I would love to see them selling at that price
At $48K I'd buy two.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2011 | 08:27 PM
  #27  
Big Vito's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: January 4, 2011
Posts: 1,811
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 5 DOT 0
At $48K I'd buy two.
If they were $48k I'll make other cars that were the same $100,000+ price $48k. Still buy the vette?
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2011 | 08:27 PM
  #28  
1 COBRA's Avatar
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 7,738
Likes: 361
From: U S A
Originally Posted by 2k7gtcs
I have too much hair on my head to buy a Vette.
Plus the are no Vette station wagons.


Reply
Old Mar 20, 2011 | 08:31 PM
  #29  
Big Vito's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: January 4, 2011
Posts: 1,811
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 1 BULLITT
Plus the are no Vette station wagons.

Reply
Old Mar 20, 2011 | 08:31 PM
  #30  
5 DOT 0's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: December 18, 2010
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by Big Vito
If they were $48k I'll make other cars that were the same $100,000+ price $48k. Still buy the vette?
At real prices I'd consider a Vette GS and actually was thinking about one. But I need a back seat for my cute 9 year old twins. Needing a back seat also eliminated the Porsche Carrera GT from consideration. But I do have a brochure.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2011 | 08:32 PM
  #31  
2k7gtcs's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,808
Likes: 163
Originally Posted by 1 BULLITT
Plus the are no Vette station wagons.





This!
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 09:35 AM
  #32  
bpmurr's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: October 13, 2004
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 0
From: MD
Originally Posted by cloud9
How is it embarrassing? Ford brought back the Boss in the same spirit as the original. Sure they could have added more technology but brought the price up closer to the GT500 or M3. They chose to keep it more affordable and make it fast. They targeted the M3 from a performance standpoint as it was the best target for a two door four seater.

That's the beauty of the current Mustang lineup. You can dial up or down your comfort and technology features, along with your preference for go fast and handling.

Embarrassing? I really don't get that.
Yeah but the GT already runs pretty much even with an M3 at half the price. It didn't take all they did with the Boss to beat it. The Boss is more than an M3 in terms of performance. I just don't think it's good to compare a luxury sports coupe to a stripped down track car.

Last edited by bpmurr; Mar 21, 2011 at 09:37 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 11:21 AM
  #33  
laserred38's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,053
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by bpmurr
Yeah but the GT already runs pretty much even with an M3 at half the price. It didn't take all they did with the Boss to beat it. The Boss is more than an M3 in terms of performance. I just don't think it's good to compare a luxury sports coupe to a stripped down track car.


This.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 11:27 AM
  #34  
cloud9's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: November 20, 2010
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 1
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Originally Posted by bpmurr
Yeah but the GT already runs pretty much even with an M3 at half the price. It didn't take all they did with the Boss to beat it. The Boss is more than an M3 in terms of performance. I just don't think it's good to compare a luxury sports coupe to a stripped down track car.
I think it has less to do with the interiors and more to do with BMW being their arch rival on the track like in the current Grand-Am Series:

http://bossmustangsonline.com/boss-3...ace-march-4-5/
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 11:29 AM
  #35  
laserred38's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,053
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
Haha really though. You could get a GT premium with HIDs, BBP and EP to load it up, for around $35-37k, put $10-15k in to it with FRPP warrantied parts, and utterly destroy a $65k M3, whilst having the same amount of luxury and saving $10-15k in purchase price (not to mention insurance). I want to see the Boss compared to the stripped down M3 GTR or whatever they call it...BMW's track prepped M3 on Michelin Sport Cups, not the regular M3. Besides, the M3 isn't even close to being what it used to be. It's not much more than a status symbol. I'm sure Dave can attest that many current generation M3 owners aren't going to be tracking their cars, but I can guarantee a lot of Boss owners will. So who cares about comparing to the M3? It's a techno loaded up high-revving grand tourer, not the lightweight track scalpel that it used to be. Is it still a good track car? Of course, but like the new 458 Italia Ferrari, any one can jump in an M3 and go fast. I don't think that's the case with the Boss. The M3 has lost its soul. The Boss has been reincarnated to wreak havoc amongst today's few remaining driver's cars.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 11:32 AM
  #36  
laserred38's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,053
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by cloud9
I think it has less to do with the interiors and more to do with BMW being their arch rival on the track like in the current Grand-Am Series:

http://bossmustangsonline.com/boss-3...ace-march-4-5/

Ehhh, this is true. You got me there. If only we had the M3 CSL here, I'd be more proud of the street Boss kicking the street M3's ****.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 11:39 AM
  #37  
bpmurr's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: October 13, 2004
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 0
From: MD
Originally Posted by laserred38
Haha really though. You could get a GT premium with HIDs, BBP and EP to load it up, for around $35-37k, put $10-15k in to it with FRPP warrantied parts, and utterly destroy a $65k M3, whilst having the same amount of luxury and saving $10-15k in purchase price (not to mention insurance). I want to see the Boss compared to the stripped down M3 GTR or whatever they call it...BMW's track prepped M3 on Michelin Sport Cups, not the regular M3. Besides, the M3 isn't even close to being what it used to be. It's not much more than a status symbol. I'm sure Dave can attest that many current generation M3 owners aren't going to be tracking their cars, but I can guarantee a lot of Boss owners will. So who cares about comparing to the M3? It's a techno loaded up high-revving grand tourer, not the lightweight track scalpel that it used to be. Is it still a good track car? Of course, but like the new 458 Italia Ferrari, any one can jump in an M3 and go fast. I don't think that's the case with the Boss. The M3 has lost its soul. The Boss has been reincarnated to wreak havoc amongst today's few remaining driver's cars.
Amen, couldn't say it better myself.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 11:48 AM
  #38  
Big Vito's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: January 4, 2011
Posts: 1,811
Likes: 0
The comparison to the M3 really bugs some people
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 11:56 AM
  #39  
dennis's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: February 9, 2011
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: La Quinta, CA
You know, just for conversation purposes, I'm a little more into amenities than most of you guys... but let me just say that I had narrowed my choice down to a new 2010 Corvette LT3 with navigation for $53,000 (yes, dual roofs, dual mode exhaust, too). Then I started fretting about it. And my wife said "You're a Ford guy, a Mustang guy," and I realized that if I bought a Corvette, I would be a Ford guy driving a Chevy. Bingo. My 2012 Kona Blue GT 500 is on order, as of today. I don't care what's faster. I need a few amenities (not too many) and I probably won't track it . . . I just know the Shelby is the best-looking car on the planet, and I like its "attitude."
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 01:20 PM
  #40  
cloud9's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: November 20, 2010
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 1
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Originally Posted by dennis
You know, just for conversation purposes, I'm a little more into amenities than most of you guys... but let me just say that I had narrowed my choice down to a new 2010 Corvette LT3 with navigation for $53,000 (yes, dual roofs, dual mode exhaust, too). Then I started fretting about it. And my wife said "You're a Ford guy, a Mustang guy," and I realized that if I bought a Corvette, I would be a Ford guy driving a Chevy. Bingo. My 2012 Kona Blue GT 500 is on order, as of today. I don't care what's faster. I need a few amenities (not too many) and I probably won't track it . . . I just know the Shelby is the best-looking car on the planet, and I like its "attitude."
Good call. I did the same thing for the same reason
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:26 PM.