2015 - 2023 MUSTANG Discuss everything 2015-2023 S550 Mustang

Weight gain is less than 100 lbs., trim for trim

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6/12/14, 06:10 PM
  #1  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
Captain Spadaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 30, 2004
Location: Romeoville, Illinois
Posts: 282
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Weight gain is less than 100 lbs., trim for trim

http://jalopnik.com/the-2015-mustang...nds-1590194961

I know that some, including myself, were hoping for a weight loss, but a net gain of less than 100 lbs, trim for trim, isn't bad.

I think this sums up my feelings on it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3ALwKeSEYs
Old 6/12/14, 06:15 PM
  #2  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Getportfolio's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 7, 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,473
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
The weight is all in the steering wheel. Lol
Old 6/12/14, 06:37 PM
  #3  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Good, I wonder how much a loaded GT will weigh then?


Also can't wait until the Alpha based Camaro comes around to see what GM can do with it.
Old 6/12/14, 07:09 PM
  #4  
Bullitt Member
 
IndustryLeech's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 3, 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It kinda feels like Ford prompted the Steeda rumors so that the 100 lb gain seemed more palatable to potential buyers.
Old 6/12/14, 07:38 PM
  #5  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
Captain Spadaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 30, 2004
Location: Romeoville, Illinois
Posts: 282
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IndustryLeech
It kinda feels like Ford prompted the Steeda rumors so that the 100 lb gain seemed more palatable to potential buyers.
That would have been a devious PR move by Ford.
Old 6/12/14, 07:44 PM
  #6  
Legacy TMS Member
 
houtex's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 2, 2004
Location: Insane
Posts: 7,583
Received 667 Likes on 541 Posts
Called it.

https://themustangsource.com/f806/st...2/#post6809918
Old 6/12/14, 08:26 PM
  #7  
Mach 1 Member
 
Dave07997S's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 23, 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whats it going to weigh with the trackpack and 20" wheels. Those 15" rotors and 6 piston calipers along with the 20" wheels are going to add to this.
Old 6/12/14, 08:31 PM
  #8  
Member
 
W72 400's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 3, 2012
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm kinda curious as to what happend about the proposed reduction in weight prior to and during the redesign. If I recall, it was supposed to be pretty significant.
Old 6/12/14, 08:33 PM
  #9  
GTR Member
 
Overboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
This should quiet down the complainers. Considering the platform updates and swath of new content, this is great news. Most people won't notice it.

And for those who want to complain, consider doing driver weight reduction. Some of us, myself included, could drop weight out of the car by losing some themselves.
Old 6/12/14, 08:59 PM
  #10  
GT Member
 
Bluejoker's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 27, 2005
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A gain of even 1 lb is a disappointment considering the rumors were that it was going to shed 2-300 lbs. 3700 lbs for a 'performance' vehicle seems almost laughable on paper, especially considering that its a brand new platform; with so little actual performance information being released, it's hard not to get a little upset over this kind of thing.

Last edited by Bluejoker; 6/12/14 at 09:01 PM.
Old 6/12/14, 09:26 PM
  #11  
Banned
 
Astenax's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 29, 2014
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Wow! So it didn't lose 200lbs? Instead it gains nearly 100lbs! My 2014 already feels too heavy, i would hate to add 100lbs to it!
Old 6/12/14, 10:25 PM
  #12  
I Have No Life
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 10,445
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
I'm sure if it lost weight too, people would complain it didn't lose enough.


If it weighed what people would WANT it to weigh, very few people would be able to afford it.
Old 6/12/14, 10:34 PM
  #13  
Super Boss Lawman Member
 
SONICBOOST's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 17, 2006
Location: Temecula,CA
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Boomer
I'm sure if it lost weight too, people would complain it didn't lose enough. If it weighed what people would WANT it to weigh, very few people would be able to afford it.
True, actual performance numbers will speak volume.
Old 6/12/14, 11:10 PM
  #14  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Bluejoker
3700 lbs for a 'performance' vehicle seems almost laughable on paper

Is it? There are other coupes out there (Nissan, Mercedes, Audi for example) that weigh as much or more and they are considered performance vehicles.




Mustang's comparatively low volume, unique platform, broad spectrum of performance, world car status, and affordable price of entry conspired to limit the amount of weight savings that could be had with the new chassis.
Old 6/13/14, 05:57 AM
  #15  
GTR Member
 
Overboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Bluejoker
A gain of even 1 lb is a disappointment considering the rumors were that it was going to shed 2-300 lbs. 3700 lbs for a 'performance' vehicle seems almost laughable on paper, especially considering that its a brand new platform; with so little actual performance information being released, it's hard not to get a little upset over this kind of thing.
If you believe weak rumors from auto new publications, then shame on you. Ford never said anything regarding specifics on weight, other than they'd met their targets. Given the new standard features, updated crash requirements, etc., that's not bad at all. I'll wait until the performance specs come out from instrumented testing, but I have no doubt the car will outperform an S197 easily.
Old 6/13/14, 07:20 AM
  #16  
Cobra Member
 
AWmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 12, 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave07997S
Whats it going to weigh with the trackpack and 20" wheels. Those 15" rotors and 6 piston calipers along with the 20" wheels are going to add to this.
I don't think you'll be able to find this answer officially since this combination is not available from Ford. I'm sure someone will do it themselves so you could ask them to weigh their car.
Old 6/13/14, 08:05 AM
  #17  
 
rhumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While not as bad a weight gain as it could have been, the expectation was a significant weight loss (100-200lbs.) While I don't recall Ford saying this specifically for the Mustang itself, they did make several broad proclamations of reducing Ford vehicle weights by at least 200lbs or something in that range. The presumption then was that Ford would adhere to this tenet with the brand new clean-sheet Mustang and drop 200+lbs. of road-hugging lard.

That obviously hasn't happened and indeed it actually porked up a touch. So while the actual weight gain might only be 50-100lbs over the previous model, it is some 250lbs over expectations, reasonable ones given Ford's broad weight reduction pronouncements.

That all said, there is a LOT of technological advancements and improvements on the S550 which to varying degrees can justify or at least ameliorate the effects of the excess mass, IRS being not the least of them. I am quite confident that the 2015 will be a huge advancement in performance and driving experience, especially in the real world driving experience beyond simple track/test numbers.
Old 6/13/14, 08:09 AM
  #18  
Cobra Member
 
69Mach1-409's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 10, 2007
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wait, so not only does it have a face that only a mother could love, but now it's fatter then the out going model? Man Ford dropped the ball on this one. I'm sure it's going to sell, but what a huge disappointment and I will not be buying one.
Old 6/13/14, 08:15 AM
  #19  
Cobra Member
 
Jazzman442's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 7, 2014
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 25 Posts
Ifyou look really close at the 2015 Engine bay you will see they have gone back to bracing the strut towers back to the fire wall support. The means they needed some more stability in the towers. Not sure why they did that but things like that add weight. You either use High Strength steel or extra bracing. Im not sure why they have extra bracing. Extra bracing IRS all adds weight. Wow I'm glad I went the with the 2014...

Old 6/13/14, 08:27 AM
  #20  
I Have No Life
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 10,445
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Hypothetical question.
If it lost 200lbs(weigh 3500lbs in V8 manual trim), would you be happy with a $5000 increase in price?
Or if it weighed 3400lbs, would you pay an extra $7,000, or $10,000?


Nothing is free. And keep in mind there is nothing out there sharing this configuration/platform right now.


I'll be waiting to see the next gen Camaro that is made with pixie dust that will weigh a magical 3500lbs in V8 trim that everyone is 'talking' about.


Quick Reply: Weight gain is less than 100 lbs., trim for trim



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:26 AM.