2015 - 2023 MUSTANG Discuss everything 2015-2023 S550 Mustang
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

VIDEO: ECO vs V6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 10, 2014 | 06:10 PM
  #1  
whowasthat's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: April 12, 2014
Posts: 109
Likes: 1
From: Toronto
VIDEO: ECO vs V6

enjoy
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2014 | 07:36 PM
  #2  
Flagstang's Avatar
Spam Connoisseur
I got هَبوب‎ed
 
Joined: September 8, 2009
Posts: 9,651
Likes: 7
From: Sun City AZ
called it

https://themustangsource.com/forums/...oboost-533025/
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2014 | 09:32 PM
  #3  
2 Go Snake's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: March 29, 2011
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 6
From: Minnesota
Unhappy

So a V6 Mustang can whup an Ecoboost 4 Mustang !
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2014 | 09:44 PM
  #4  
5.M0NSTER's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: August 2, 2013
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 254
From: Little north of Stuttgart, Germany
This thread has the videos for both V6 vs EB, and 2012 stock GT vs 2015 Stock GT

https://themustangsource.com/forums/...2/#post6858879

In both cases the S197 wins. No surprises there I suppose. But after all the ecoboost hype? Oooutch

Last edited by 5.M0NSTER; Oct 10, 2014 at 10:14 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2014 | 10:49 PM
  #5  
Rodsmustang's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: July 24, 2014
Posts: 216
Likes: 2
From: Arizona
Makes me feel pretty good about my recent purchase!! Although that eco-boost will respond well with mods, unfortunately the warranty will be voided with the slightest of mods. I have to say, I like the new mustang for different reasons than my 2014, but I wouldn't say I like it more. Thanks, AM for those informative video's!!!
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2014 | 10:49 PM
  #6  
SONICBOOST's Avatar
Super Boss Lawman Member
 
Joined: January 17, 2006
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 3
From: Temecula,CA
The manual ecoboost ran 13.8 the first run against the ecoboost automatic. Then the manual ecoboost ran 15.00 against the s197 V6 which ran 14.50. So basically if the s197 v6 ran against the ecoboost the first run when it ran the 13.8 would it be,"the ecoboost spanked the s197 V6"? C'mon guys
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2014 | 11:00 PM
  #7  
Rodsmustang's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: July 24, 2014
Posts: 216
Likes: 2
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by SONICBOOST
The manual ecoboost ran 13.8 the first run against the ecoboost automatic. Then the manual ecoboost ran 15.00 against the s197 V6 which ran 14.50. So basically if the s197 v6 ran against the ecoboost the first run when it ran the 13.8 would it be,"the ecoboost spanked the s197 V6"? C'mon guys

Track conditions may have changed, it didn't look liked they spun the tires and they would have mentioned a miss shift. So I have to conclude that they ran what they ran and actually it looked like the 2015 took off first and was ahead until the v6 reeled him in for the win.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2014 | 11:16 PM
  #8  
SONICBOOST's Avatar
Super Boss Lawman Member
 
Joined: January 17, 2006
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 3
From: Temecula,CA
Originally Posted by Rodsmustang
Track conditions may have changed, it didn't look liked they spun the tires and they would have mentioned a miss shift. So I have to conclude that they ran what they ran and actually it looked like the 2015 took off first and was ahead until the v6 reeled him in for the win.
I agree but how did the ecoboost run 13.8, then run a 15.0. I'm no track expert to add just looking at it from virgin track eyes. So the ecoboost ran a 13.8 on a good run. What does the s 197 v6 run on a good run?
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2014 | 11:50 PM
  #9  
Joeywhat's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: February 6, 2014
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 41
From: Motor City
The lower time was a manual, against the V6 was an auto. With the Ecoboost losing power FAST after 5k rpm, I wonder if the auto was still taking it to redline. I bet the manual was quicker because the driver was shifting at the top of the power band and not at redline.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2014 | 11:50 PM
  #10  
Joeywhat's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: February 6, 2014
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 41
From: Motor City
That would also explain the Ecoboost taking it off the line but falling flat near the end.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2014 | 09:06 AM
  #11  
5.M0NSTER's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: August 2, 2013
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 254
From: Little north of Stuttgart, Germany
Originally Posted by SONICBOOST
I agree but how did the ecoboost run 13.8, then run a 15.0. I'm no track expert to add just looking at it from virgin track eyes. So the ecoboost ran a 13.8 on a good run. What does the s 197 v6 run on a good run?
I'm with Joey on this one. The 13.8 was EB manual, and the V6 was auto. So they ran Auto EV versus Auto V6, and the V6 won fair and square.

So IF you pick the better run of the EB auto you get 14.3. The V6 auto only got one run, and that's the one where it spanked the EB. but IF you compare EB auto's best time you get a 14.3.vs. 14.5. I think AT BEST the stock EB is even with the V6. Not very impressive either way.

I'd like to see EB manual vs V6 manual. I think it would be quite even.

P.S. zeroto60times has a 2013 V6 premium running a quarter in 13.7

Last edited by 5.M0NSTER; Oct 11, 2014 at 09:50 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2014 | 11:43 AM
  #12  
laserred38's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,053
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
There's still more variables to consider, like rear gears. That V6 looked like a rental, so it for sure has the 2.73s. Put a 3.31 V6 up against a 3.31 EB and see what happens...
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2014 | 12:05 PM
  #13  
Rodsmustang's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: July 24, 2014
Posts: 216
Likes: 2
From: Arizona
It would be nice to see them dyno both cars, on the same dyno of course.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2014 | 01:57 PM
  #14  
Astenax's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 29, 2014
Posts: 235
Likes: 2
How are you future 15' owners feeling right about now? I thought this new Stang was going to be 200lbs lighter with 450hp and rape a corvette with its irs and consume the cowmaro with bolts of lightning from its ars loool! I would bet the remaining 14's are going to sell fast after this hahahahahaha!
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2014 | 05:42 PM
  #15  
SONICBOOST's Avatar
Super Boss Lawman Member
 
Joined: January 17, 2006
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 3
From: Temecula,CA
Originally Posted by 5.M0NSTER
I'm with Joey on this one. The 13.8 was EB manual, and the V6 was auto. So they ran Auto EV versus Auto V6, and the V6 won fair and square. So IF you pick the better run of the EB auto you get 14.3. The V6 auto only got one run, and that's the one where it spanked the EB. but IF you compare EB auto's best time you get a 14.3.vs. 14.5. I think AT BEST the stock EB is even with the V6. Not very impressive either way. I'd like to see EB manual vs V6 manual. I think it would be quite even. P.S. zeroto60times has a 2013 V6 premium running a quarter in 13.7
Interesting! I would like to see the EB manual vs a s197 V6. If the race was close I guess the EB has more upside with mod potential but at the cost of voiding the warranty! I would expect the EB to walk on the V6, that's not the case though!
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2014 | 08:08 PM
  #16  
5.M0NSTER's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: August 2, 2013
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 254
From: Little north of Stuttgart, Germany
Originally Posted by SONICBOOST
Interesting! I would like to see the EB manual vs a s197 V6. If the race was close I guess the EB has more upside with mod potential but at the cost of voiding the warranty! I would expect the EB to walk on the V6, that's not the case though!
Yes sir. I agree that EB has more room to grow so to say, but at your own risk. In terms of stock cars, the S197's beat their counterparts. I guess the S550 is too heavy compared to the power gain. Too bad. Maybe in Model Year 2017 this will change. But for now, I'm soooo glad I bought a 2014 instead of a 2015. And now not just because of looks!

Last edited by 5.M0NSTER; Oct 11, 2014 at 08:13 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2014 | 08:55 AM
  #17  
MRGTX's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: May 18, 2010
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 15
From: CT
Yikes...
Go V6!!

I realize that there is more power on the table from pretty much any boosted stock motor...but they're already asking a lot from a relatively tiny set of four cylinders. How far can they really take it? 400+hp is probably not a formula for a long life from a motor of this size...but I hope to be proven wrong.

How does the S550 V6 compare so that we're not just looking at the weight disadantage holding back the '15?
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2014 | 12:34 PM
  #18  
CBJ's Avatar
CBJ
V6 Member
 
Joined: July 13, 2014
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Doesn't the classic saying applies..it's about the cylinders. Same thing GT guys have been telling v6 owners for years.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carid
Vendor Showcase
8
May 3, 2026 05:42 AM
dmichaels
2010-2014 Mustang
5
Aug 16, 2015 06:05 PM
retiredf5
Ecoboost
0
Jul 21, 2015 05:54 PM
rhumb
Ford Discussions
7
May 16, 2008 09:17 AM
eci
GT Performance Mods
20
Sep 14, 2006 10:12 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:32 AM.