The Shape of things to come...
1/9/10, 11:33 AM
#23
FR500 Member
Join Date: August 15, 2005
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Personally prefer simple controls. More reliable over the long run. If Ford or any auto manufacturer has a integrated multifunction/display system that is truly intuitive (in-depth manual reading not required) and not distracting to the operator, it would be a winner. Make "the voice" sound better too.
Last edited by hi5.0; 1/9/10 at 11:34 AM.
1/9/10, 11:50 AM
#24
FR500 Member
Join Date: July 1, 2008
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
while the tech stuff is really cool to look at, I think things are going in a dangerous direction. If all the controls are in a touchscreen, then it's guaranteed that the driver will have to take his/her eyes off of the road in order to do the simplest of adjustments.
I think it's particularly BAD that the screen can be reconfigured, since you won't know if the control you want to use is actually there or not without looking.
I think this is the worst kind of tech to have.
A much better solution might involve a head's up display with voice and or tactile input via the steering wheel. Ford needs to look at how fighter jets are set up. That's the way to go.
I think it's particularly BAD that the screen can be reconfigured, since you won't know if the control you want to use is actually there or not without looking.
I think this is the worst kind of tech to have.
A much better solution might involve a head's up display with voice and or tactile input via the steering wheel. Ford needs to look at how fighter jets are set up. That's the way to go.
1/9/10, 12:08 PM
#25
I Have No Life
Apparently with this system the stuff that's on the touch screen can be accessed on the main speedo gauges anyway, is voice activated (or can be) and has steering wheel controls.
It's colour based so that once you know the system, at the corner of your eye you can determine what set of controls are on the screen and ONLY some stuff will be able to be selectable while driving.
Even with less now, you probably take your eyes off the road more with current systems, compared to this new interface system.
It's colour based so that once you know the system, at the corner of your eye you can determine what set of controls are on the screen and ONLY some stuff will be able to be selectable while driving.
Even with less now, you probably take your eyes off the road more with current systems, compared to this new interface system.
1/9/10, 08:55 PM
#27
Shelby GT350 Member
I like where this kind of technology is going. It will sure clean up dashes, eliminate a lot of ***** and switches. Just have the center touch screen control everything... I also like voice comands that control lights, HVAC and Audio... Hey maybe even control shifting the gear range of the automatic transmission, activating cruise control and wipers... For the gauges, I like the idea of infintely configurable LCD displays in color, layout and design. It can be as thin as a notebook display or thinner and take up less space behind the dash.
1/9/10, 09:47 PM
#28
Banned
Join Date: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I like where this kind of technology is going. It will sure clean up dashes, eliminate a lot of ***** and switches. Just have the center touch screen control everything... I also like voice comands that control lights, HVAC and Audio... Hey maybe even control shifting the gear range of the automatic transmission, activating cruise control and wipers... For the gauges, I like the idea of infintely configurable LCD displays in color, layout and design. It can be as thin as a notebook display or thinner and take up less space behind the dash.
1/9/10, 10:25 PM
#30
Banned
Join Date: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Just wait, it has stuff to deal with stuff"
1/10/10, 02:29 AM
#31
Shelby GT500 Member
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The CAN network is used for module to module communication. IE the ABS module will relay the VSS to the PCM via the CAN network, rather than the VSS being hardwired to both modules.
As far as this dash goes, I will assure you the audio module will be built in, and it will work as a circuit board. I'm no electrical tech, but right now, these "hard switches" simply tell the ACM the change in resistor value, the ACM checks the VREF change from the switch you pushed, and will do the action desired based on its progamming.
You arent going to hardwire every input to every module, cars need networks to simplify diagnosis. I rather check 1 circuit than 56.
As far as this dash goes, I will assure you the audio module will be built in, and it will work as a circuit board. I'm no electrical tech, but right now, these "hard switches" simply tell the ACM the change in resistor value, the ACM checks the VREF change from the switch you pushed, and will do the action desired based on its progamming.
You arent going to hardwire every input to every module, cars need networks to simplify diagnosis. I rather check 1 circuit than 56.
Last edited by ManEHawke; 1/10/10 at 02:31 AM.
1/10/10, 08:46 AM
#32
I Have No Life
I guess you don't understand what centralized means. Centralized means the control input is on the CAN bus. Doesn't matter where the buttons are, matters where the CONTROL is processed and commands issued to targets which is ONE PLACE. Single point of failure. If there are 45 "wipers on" buttons, 56 "radio on" buttons, etc etc that ALL go to CAN instead of seperate circuits, it is not a good design
"Just wait, it has stuff to deal with stuff"
"Just wait, it has stuff to deal with stuff"
Centralized control, processing, user interaction.
Really sorry I didn't read into your meaning....silly me..what was I thinking.
1/13/10, 09:16 AM
#33
This is going to be awesome. When I asked someone back in '05 about why the MyColor didn't extend past the gauges, they said that bigger things were coming. I guess with Sync and eventually the MFT (MyFordTouch), it was a matter of time.
I'm sure we'll have the ability to set up 'performance' screens, which would be truly kick a**.
I'm sure we'll have the ability to set up 'performance' screens, which would be truly kick a**.
1/13/10, 09:28 AM
#34
Cobra Member
1/13/10, 09:49 AM
#35
I Have No Life
Just look at everything else and extend it to the next level.
The ammount of customization will be awsome in future vehicles, not only that, but I can see even MORE connectivity with smart phones and the power to do a lot of things.
The ammount of customization will be awsome in future vehicles, not only that, but I can see even MORE connectivity with smart phones and the power to do a lot of things.
1/14/10, 08:51 AM
#36
Cobra Member
But think of the possibilities.....Soon not only will you be able to brick you cell phone, but your car as well
Last edited by lowblustang00; 1/14/10 at 08:52 AM.
1/17/10, 10:45 AM
#37
Cobra Member
Join Date: December 18, 2004
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks great to me! The Mustang doesn't have to be mired into being a retro-relic to keep its spirit. What I'd love to see is an instrument panel much more tied into all the data available via the ECU/OBDII system. The Nissan GT-R does this a bit, and the new Lexus LF-A a lot more, but I think reconfigurable electronic displays could go much, much further.
Imagine the possibilities in terms of performance tuning, maintenance and general vehicle awareness.
How's that new cold air intake system working? Dial up the air intake temp sensor reading to find out to the degree.
Engine running a touch rough? How much better to have the display tell you the #5 cylinder spark is misfiring rather than just a single CEL light glaring dumbly at you.
As anyone who's fooled with an OBD reader, especially the fancier laptop-based ones, know, there is a wealth of data already available to be readily tapped by a smart instrument panel.
Imagine the possibilities in terms of performance tuning, maintenance and general vehicle awareness.
How's that new cold air intake system working? Dial up the air intake temp sensor reading to find out to the degree.
Engine running a touch rough? How much better to have the display tell you the #5 cylinder spark is misfiring rather than just a single CEL light glaring dumbly at you.
As anyone who's fooled with an OBD reader, especially the fancier laptop-based ones, know, there is a wealth of data already available to be readily tapped by a smart instrument panel.
Agree...but with the traditional Mustang layout...I'm betting Ford could pull it off. Something else I'd like to see is HUD display...my 535 has it and it is fantastic!
1/25/10, 09:58 AM
#38
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: November 3, 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It would be cool if they have tactile feedback on the controls so that you can feel it when you touch a button. It doesn't make sense if you have to take your eyes off of the road to use it. One crash while granny tries to turn up the heater and Ford will be drowning in lawsuits.
1/25/10, 10:16 AM
#39
I think the 2014 could have an active screen in the middle of two analog gauges like what the new Super Duty trucks have. You could put all the aux. gauges in there and display diagnostics and performance data with the MyFord Touch setup modified for a sports car. On the SVT models, have a boost gauge, true oil temp/press and exhaust temp readouts.
I'd also love to see something like the BMW performance steering wheel. Display G-forces, lap times, etc. right on the wheel or the dash.
I'd also love to see something like the BMW performance steering wheel. Display G-forces, lap times, etc. right on the wheel or the dash.
