Retractable hard-top?
#1
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
Retractable hard-top?
I've never been a big fan of ragtops... just don't like the look. But I'd be all over a retractable hard-top. **** the cost. Lots of folks are doing it... why not Ford?
#2
GTR Member
Because they're heavy, expensive and give cars huge rear ends. I think they work much better on 2-seaters, rather than 2+2s.
Ford do make a C/C version of the Focus for Europe.
Ford do make a C/C version of the Focus for Europe.
#4
#5
Cobra Member
Join Date: October 12, 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
4 Posts
I agree with Twin Turbo. It would likely kill the short rear deck profile that the Mustang is known for.
Also, I would like to put the top down and still have some trunk space.
One thing that would be nice is being able to enlarge the trunk space when the top is up.
Also, I would like to put the top down and still have some trunk space.
One thing that would be nice is being able to enlarge the trunk space when the top is up.
#7
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: September 10, 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you forget too retractable hard tops leave almost no trunk space. EVEN with the top UP the mechanisms eat a ton of space maybe half to 2/3s.... and with the top down forget about it.... take a look at someones 335 or VW folding hard top, up and down it makes the car completely impractical for daily driving tasks.
not to mention i dont think they look that much better
not to mention i dont think they look that much better
#8
#10
Legacy TMS Member
#12
Cobra R Member
Originally Posted by Moosetang
I think BMW pulls it off well, and it would definitely help the car's premium appeal in cities and over in Europe.
#14
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#15
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: September 10, 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you can see there how terrible the trunk is with the hardtop up or down, and i think ford would lose many customers who buy to use as their DD and cant afford another car, (they sell alot more v6s than v8s). personally i think the slightly off proportions of the folding hardtop look worse than the contrast of the softtop but thats just me.
#16
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would prefer a well designed, easy to operate and aesthetically pleasing soft top. Hard tops, while nice in many ways, are also rather antithetical to an affordable performance car in terms of cost, complexity, weight and bulk. I'd rather a premium-quality soft top, pretty much like the current Stang Vert's.
#17
Cobra Member
Join Date: October 12, 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
4 Posts
I would prefer a well designed, easy to operate and aesthetically pleasing soft top. Hard tops, while nice in many ways, are also rather antithetical to an affordable performance car in terms of cost, complexity, weight and bulk. I'd rather a premium-quality soft top, pretty much like the current Stang Vert's.
I'd love to be able to open the top from the remote.
#18
Cobra Member
VW has the EOS here, I would like to see Ford bring in the C/C version of the Focus. Keep the Mustang with the cloth top, but compete with VW with the Focus, maybe an SVT version...
#19
Cobra R Member
Originally Posted by Moosetang
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make, care to expand on your thoughts?
#20
Bullitt Member
Join Date: September 3, 2012
Location: Central Jersey
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mercedes-benz Does it Pretty well-
http://www.mbusa.com/mercedes/vehicl...vehicle-design
http://www.mbusa.com/mercedes/vehicl...vehicle-design