Questions we have about the 2015 Mustang that are still unanswered
#1
Shelby GT350 Member
Thread Starter
Questions we have about the 2015 Mustang that are still unanswered
Ok, guys- while just a couple weeks back, we were suddenly basking in pics and new information. Just as suddenly, the information stream has gone dry and there is a lot of official data that has yet to be revealed.
List your questions...of course, if someone knows the answer please feel free to chime in.
Large questions still on my mind:
1.) Curb Weight of each model
1a) Weight distribution/center of gravity
2.) Pricing
2a) Details of what each trim level includes
3.) Exact power numbers for each engine
4.) EPA ratings
5.) How badly will the '15 GT spank the M4 in the dollar : performance category?
Trivial/points of unanswered interest
1.) Are the rumors of the new V8 engine/Coyote replacement true for the near futue?
2.) What components, if any will carry over to the new model?
2a.) Will the wheels retain the same offset and bolt pattern?
3.) Will the mountain moving 5.8L motor return or not?
4.) Will the 2015s accept custom engine tuning as well as current gen cars?
Let's hear yours!
List your questions...of course, if someone knows the answer please feel free to chime in.
Large questions still on my mind:
1.) Curb Weight of each model
1a) Weight distribution/center of gravity
2.) Pricing
2a) Details of what each trim level includes
3.) Exact power numbers for each engine
4.) EPA ratings
5.) How badly will the '15 GT spank the M4 in the dollar : performance category?
Trivial/points of unanswered interest
1.) Are the rumors of the new V8 engine/Coyote replacement true for the near futue?
2.) What components, if any will carry over to the new model?
2a.) Will the wheels retain the same offset and bolt pattern?
3.) Will the mountain moving 5.8L motor return or not?
4.) Will the 2015s accept custom engine tuning as well as current gen cars?
Let's hear yours!
Last edited by MRGTX; 12/20/13 at 06:51 AM.
#3
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: September 10, 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MRGTX
5.) How badly will the '15 GT spank the M4 in the dollar : performance category?
Originally Posted by MRGTX
2a.) Will the wheels retain the same offset and bolt pattern?
#4
Shelby GT350 Member
Thread Starter
Good catch. This is a good sign.
#6
GTR Member
Are you referring to Voodoo? Rumours point to this being based on Coyote, just as RoadRunner (the Boss 302) engine was. It'll be used in an SE, but won't replace the 5.0 Coyote in the GT
#7
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: October 12, 2009
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Will HUD be on any models? (Now or in the future.)
Will the glass roof make its return?
Will the FRPP Supercharger fit or did they have to rework everything?
Are there any plans to have a track key system? (SE perhaps)
Ford will unveil some new tech details Jan 7 at CES.
Will the glass roof make its return?
Will the FRPP Supercharger fit or did they have to rework everything?
Are there any plans to have a track key system? (SE perhaps)
Ford will unveil some new tech details Jan 7 at CES.
Last edited by SynisterGT; 12/20/13 at 09:05 AM.
#8
I understand the desire to know meow, but honestly, it'll come out when Ford is good and ready to release info. Asking questions like "what about a new engine or SE?" to a Ford engineer or marketing guy is going to get an odd look and the same, generic response.
We'll get items like pricing, weight distribution, and overall weight between now and launch. Since the design is out in public view now, they can keep riding the marketing hype and release info little by little. Asking about future product, however, is just ignorant and unnecessary at this point.
We'll get items like pricing, weight distribution, and overall weight between now and launch. Since the design is out in public view now, they can keep riding the marketing hype and release info little by little. Asking about future product, however, is just ignorant and unnecessary at this point.
#9
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My guestimates:
Same as the current model.
Maybe a bit closer to 50/50 than the current model.
+10% over current model.
TBD
By cylinder count: 330, 305, 440
+5-10% over similar current engines. Egoboost 2.3 will be better than the V6 by 3-5mpg EPA rating but less so in real world driving (once you start getting on boost they can really suck down the gas sufficient to produce the HP numbers).
Pretty soundly, never mind the presumed GT350. BMW ought to be concerned, very concerned. Both will sound good, just different.
Trivial/points of unanswered interest
Any new V8s will be evolutionary developments off of the current Coyote, which will also evolve in the GT. DI would be one obvious addition but perhaps some sort of cylinder deactivation too. HiPo SE models will likely have more displacement, flat-plane crank (GT350), or turbos (GT500)
Few.
Bolt pattern-same, offsets-different.
If at all, only as a filler until they get a TT Coyote varient online.
Yup.
1.) Curb Weight of each model
1a) Weight distribution/center of gravity
2.) Pricing
2a) Details of what each trim level includes
3.) Exact power numbers for each engine
4.) EPA ratings
5.) How badly will the '15 GT spank the M4 in the dollar : performance category?
Trivial/points of unanswered interest
1.) Are the rumors of the new V8 engine/Coyote replacement true for the near futue?
2.) What components, if any will carry over to the new model?
2a.) Will the wheels retain the same offset and bolt pattern?
3.) Will the mountain moving 5.8L motor return or not?
4.) Will the 2015s accept custom engine tuning as well as current gen cars?
Last edited by rhumb; 12/20/13 at 12:17 PM.
#10
Cobra Member
My guestimates:
Same as the current model.
Maybe a bit closer to 50/50 than the current model.
+10% over current model.
TBD
By cylinder count: 330, 305, 440
+5-10% over similar current engines. Egoboost 2.3 will be better than the V6 by 3-5mpg EPA rating but less so in real world driving (once you start getting on boost they can really suck down the gas sufficient to produce the HP numbers).
Pretty soundly, never mind the presumed GT350. BMW ought to be concerned, very concerned. Both will sound good, just different.
Trivial/points of unanswered interest
Any new V8s will be evolutionary developments off of the current Coyote, which will also evolve in the GT. DI would be one obvious addition but perhaps some sort of cylinder deactivation too. HiPo SE models will likely have more displacement, flat-plane crank (GT350), or turbos (GT500)
Few.
Bolt pattern-same, offsets-different.
If at all, only as a filler until they get a TT Coyote varient online.
Yup.
Same as the current model.
Maybe a bit closer to 50/50 than the current model.
+10% over current model.
TBD
By cylinder count: 330, 305, 440
+5-10% over similar current engines. Egoboost 2.3 will be better than the V6 by 3-5mpg EPA rating but less so in real world driving (once you start getting on boost they can really suck down the gas sufficient to produce the HP numbers).
Pretty soundly, never mind the presumed GT350. BMW ought to be concerned, very concerned. Both will sound good, just different.
Trivial/points of unanswered interest
Any new V8s will be evolutionary developments off of the current Coyote, which will also evolve in the GT. DI would be one obvious addition but perhaps some sort of cylinder deactivation too. HiPo SE models will likely have more displacement, flat-plane crank (GT350), or turbos (GT500)
Few.
Bolt pattern-same, offsets-different.
If at all, only as a filler until they get a TT Coyote varient online.
Yup.
#12
Cobra R Member
Join Date: August 7, 2004
Location: Ladner,Canada
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Question is: When will the next version of the Mustang come out,to replace this European soulless version? Also will this BMW Mustang cost the same as other expensive Euro cars?
#14
Cobra R Member
Join Date: August 7, 2004
Location: Ladner,Canada
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#15
#16
#17
Bullitt Member
Not disagreeing with you I haven't seen it in person myself but pictures say it could be considered a Fastback.
Last edited by knk11stang; 12/23/13 at 08:39 PM. Reason: add
#18
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Soulless? Not enough gaudy clown-show silliness going on? There's always the Pep-Boys accessories aisle to add a bit more, ummm, soul. That said, I suspect there might be a Mach I version in a year or two with all the additional sparkly jewelry, racy stickers, shiny bits and large tack-ons for those who conflate more styling with good styling. For those whose aesthetic sensibilities have evolved beyond the 8th grade study hall level, I like the cleanly and well-styled Stang just as it is.
Cost? Maybe a grand or two more than the current model, but for that, you get genuine 21st century (vs. 19th century) technology and an interior you can be enthuses by, not make excuses for. More important, it'll likely be at least $5-10k cheaper than similar Euro brands, if not more. I'd get a decently spec'ed GT will be closer to $20K cheaper than a new M3 with similar spec's and numbers and won't feel so bargain basement as the current car for the savings.
Last edited by rhumb; 12/24/13 at 08:08 AM.
#19
Cobra R Member
Oh It's a Fastback Alright. I'd love it if it is also a Hatch. Since they went as far as making completely different Quarter Panels and Trunk Lids for the Convertible for the first time since 73 it's not unfeasible that they could have made the coupe a Hatchback. Like I said, Nobody has seen the Trunk on the Coupe Open, and Ford has already said there are more than a few surprises they haven't revealed yet. That would be a huge surprise. Since America is so Hatch Phobic (Unless they weigh two and a half tons) it would be a good marketing ploy. Show it off and get people's interest and Stoke the flames of their desire so they Want One then reveal that not only is it a Beautiful, Sexy Beast, but Practical too.
#20
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: September 10, 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think its one of those things where you wont be wrong calling it a fastback or a coupe, its kinda in the middle stylistically. Technically it might be a 2+2 coupe for EPA purposes and I am going to call it a coupe but I wouldn't disagree with someone calling it a fastback. To each their own.