2015 - 2023 MUSTANG Discuss everything 2015-2023 S550 Mustang

No TT5.0 for the GT500 says Ford

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1/8/10, 10:58 AM
  #1  
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
 
FireDragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 3, 2004
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No TT5.0 for the GT500 says Ford

In recent months, rumors have been rampant that the next generation of Ford's Shelby GT500 Mustang would dump the existing 5.4-liter supercharged V8 in favor of a twin-turbo version of the new 5.0-liter Coyote V8 that debuts this spring. Unfortunately, in spite of earlier reports confirming the development, it appears that such an engine will not be installed in the GT500 any time soon. Autoblog had the chance to talk with Mike Harrison, Ford's chief engineer for the 5.0-liter and 6.2-liter V8 engines this morning, and he made it clear that the mooted engine is not part of the program for the Blue Oval bomber.
http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/08/f...-shelby-gt500/

Looks like it's gonna be the 5.4AL for a while, anyway.
Old 1/8/10, 12:16 PM
  #2  
I Have No Life
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 10,445
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Like I said before the 5.4 has legs still.
and who's to say its not a supercharged hopped up 5L?
or a different platform in the future that COULD accomodate such engines.

We'll have to wait and see.
Regardless the Shelby won't be power starved..
Old 1/8/10, 12:26 PM
  #3  
eci
Banned
 
eci's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not sure I've ever seen a power starved Shelby...
Old 1/8/10, 12:44 PM
  #4  
Mach 1 Member
 
xlover's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 10, 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Note: the reasoning they use is that they cannot fit the turbos in the current design. that says nothing about the 2014 redesign. I wouldn't have expected it in this generation of the car anyway. Next gen all bets are off. The engine will probably be mounted further back in the chassis for balance or at least the wheels pushed forward a bit for better balance and also you get more clearance on either side of the engine.
Old 1/8/10, 12:52 PM
  #5  
GTR Member
 
Twin Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 18, 2006
Location: England
Posts: 5,553
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Yep, certainly makes sense to develop the forced induction Coyote for the next platform
Old 1/8/10, 01:32 PM
  #6  
Cobra Member
 
boduke0220's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 3, 2007
Location: North carolina
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ive seen a power starved shelby..the shelby GT
Old 1/8/10, 01:37 PM
  #7  
FR500 Member
 
PTRocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 1, 2008
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by xlover
Note: the reasoning they use is that they cannot fit the turbos in the current design. that says nothing about the 2014 redesign. I wouldn't have expected it in this generation of the car anyway. Next gen all bets are off. The engine will probably be mounted further back in the chassis for balance or at least the wheels pushed forward a bit for better balance and also you get more clearance on either side of the engine.
Can't how much farther they can push the front wheels. I thought they did a great job with the S197's as it is.
Old 1/8/10, 01:37 PM
  #8  
Super Boss Lawman Member
 
BA Mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 29, 2007
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 4,134
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by boduke0220
ive seen a power starved shelby..the shelby GT
That was until they put superchargers and turbos on them.
Old 1/8/10, 02:53 PM
  #9  
Cobra Member
 
Rampant's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 25, 2004
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think this might make the centrifugal blower and turbo makers of the world a bit disappointed if there is that little room inside the engine bay of the '11 GT. But, the positive-displacement guys ought to be jumping up and down in excitement.
Old 1/8/10, 03:00 PM
  #10  
legacy Tms Member
 
ford4v429's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 9, 2005
Location: N.E. Ohio
Posts: 2,591
Received 58 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by eci
I'm not sure I've ever seen a power starved Shelby...
Well, this one did 0-60 in like 8 seconds
Attached Images  
Old 1/8/10, 03:48 PM
  #11  
GTR Member
 
Overboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So we get the Al block 5.4 this year and they ride it out a bit more, then switch to the S/C 5.0 in the near future, big deal...they're going to keep the power on a level that we haven't seen yet, and that's what we want. The SAE article mentioned specifics on points that were not used but would easily accommodate a blower down the road. The Coyote/Road Runner motors will all make sense soon enough...
Old 1/9/10, 11:24 AM
  #12  
FR500 Member
 
hi5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 15, 2005
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most likely will be a Eaton-type blower sitting on a version of the 5.0L in the future is what it sounds like. Since Ford already has a lot of experience with that setup. Continuing the legacy that started with the '03-'04 Cobras. Any idea how far the 5.0 can be bored/stroked?
Old 1/10/10, 10:01 AM
  #13  
bt4
Bullitt Member
 
bt4's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 25, 2004
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I understand the concept (and potential) of a TT 5.0 appeals to many—however, the only severe criticism of the GT500 motor was the weight of the iron block. Horsepower was/is not much of an issue for the 5.4—540HP is more than adequate for a street machine. (Hello Officer! No I don’t know how fast I was going, but I’ll bet you’re just dying to tell me!) And the 5.4 at 540 is certainly not maxing out the engine’s potential. Shelby’s (high-priced) Super Snake packages seem to have little trouble generating 630-HP from the 5.4 and the issues with the 750HP edition have little to do with the motor, but rather the price and how to get it to hook up.

I’ll admit I’d be excited to see a TT5.0, but for now, the move to the AL block could prove interesting. I am curious to see performance tests of the GT500 with about 100-lbs of weight removed from the front-end. The lighter weight and change in weight distribution should make a noticeable difference in handling as well as straight-line performance.
Old 1/10/10, 10:07 AM
  #14  
FR500 Member
 
hi5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 15, 2005
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would be even more interesting to compare the weights of the Al S/C 5.4 V8 against a TT - or even better yet, a TT CGI block version of the Coyote with internals to match.
Old 1/12/10, 05:16 PM
  #15  
GT Member
 
jasongt06's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 28, 2008
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What got this guy banned? Not that I am complaining.








Originally Posted by eci
I'm not sure I've ever seen a power starved Shelby...
Old 1/12/10, 05:31 PM
  #16  
Cobra Member
 
HOTLAP's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 18, 2004
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Boomer
Like I said before the 5.4 has legs still.
and who's to say its not a supercharged hopped up 5L?
or a different platform in the future that COULD accomodate such engines.

We'll have to wait and see.
Regardless the Shelby won't be power starved..
Agreed, my biggest complaint was the weight of the iron block - if the alum is durable (and I'm betting it will be) then the alum block 5.4 is going to be a GREAT engine. I have a tt 535i and while it's only 300hhp I much preferred the S/C in my GT500 due to the "INSTANT ON" rush when hitting WOT! Now an equal hp tt would be more of an apples-to-apples comparison but you still have to wait for the turbos to spin up. Funny how BMW claims they mostly eleminated turbo lag by using two smaller turbos - vs one large one - but it's really still there...
Old 1/12/10, 05:46 PM
  #17  
Post *****
 
cdynaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by jasongt06
What got this guy banned? Not that I am complaining.

I don't know for sure... but he didn't seem to know how to disagree or make his point without being over abrasive. Some replies he was a jack ****. Then the finger pic on that other thread was way overkill to make his point. However, I hope the mods pm'd warnings to him rather than just booting him.

Nothing wrong with good debate and pointed conversation. But when it breaks down to 4th grade stuff and tit for tat it gets old for those of us trying to learn or contribute something. IMO

Last edited by cdynaco; 1/12/10 at 05:51 PM.
Old 1/12/10, 06:17 PM
  #18  
I Have No Life
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 10,445
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
We try to keep this site as family friendly as possible.
The site has rules and guidelines.

The moderators have discussed this thoroughly and the decision for a 7 day break was decided.

We take our membership seriously, and like to keep the forums clean, friendly and helpful to all.
That said, the mods have full time jobs and can only keep up when we have free time, so we thank everyone that helps by reporting posts and infractions.

Last edited by Boomer; 1/13/10 at 06:44 AM.
Old 1/12/10, 06:49 PM
  #19  
Team Mustang Source
 
montreal ponies's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Boomer
We try to keep this site as family friendly as possible.
The site has rules and guidelines.

The moderators have discussed this thouroughly and the decision for a 7 day break was decided.

We take our membership seriously, and like to keep the forums clean, friendly and helpful to all.
That said, the mods have full time jobs and can only keep up when we have free time, so we thank everyone that helps by reporting posts and infractions.
We hope this will help and he comes back with less agressivity towards his replies and way of thinking.
Old 1/12/10, 08:05 PM
  #20  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Were getting pretty close to an all new Mustang so I wnder if Ford is going to doing any more development on the 5.4 mill? And I'm not talking anything major but a new cylinderhead based on the 5.0 (including VVT) would make for a nice upgrade to the current engine.


Quick Reply: No TT5.0 for the GT500 says Ford



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:17 AM.