2015 - 2023 MUSTANG Discuss everything 2015-2023 S550 Mustang

I want a Hyundai style engine line up for 2014

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12/17/09, 08:17 PM
  #41  
Member
 
Mickey's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 3, 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry I did not address the cost
V4 twin turbo $26,000 base
V6 twin turbo $34,000 base
V8 twin turbo $50,000 base
Old 12/18/09, 11:26 AM
  #42  
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
 
jarradasay's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 17, 2004
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Mickey
Sorry I did not address the cost
V4 twin turbo $26,000 base
V6 twin turbo $34,000 base
V8 twin turbo $50,000 base
V4 Twin Turbo??

Subaru makes a Horizontally opposed 4, but I've never heard of or seen a V4.

Twin turbos on a 4 would be too much. You can run 18 psi out of a 2.0 with a single garrett T25. More boost then that and you'd better have spare parts stocked.
Old 12/18/09, 11:55 AM
  #43  
legacy Tms Member MEMORIAL Rest In Peace 10/06/2021
 
David Young's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 16, 2009
Location: Clinton Tennessee
Posts: 3,377
Received 124 Likes on 100 Posts
Saab made a V-4.
Old 12/19/09, 06:14 AM
  #44  
Bullitt Member
 
blksn8k's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 12, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So did Honda but it was a motorcycle engine. I had a V45 Sabre in the early 80s.

Oh, and then there is this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Taunus_V4_engine
Old 12/20/09, 07:09 PM
  #45  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by David Young
Saab made a V-4.
Actually it was german and it was Ford, beleive it or not, the V4 used in the Saab was the grand daddy of the 4.0 used up until recently in the Mustang.
Old 12/20/09, 10:07 PM
  #46  
Legacy TMS Member
 
laserred38's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,047
Received 166 Likes on 141 Posts
Originally Posted by jarradasay
I want whatever you are smoking

V6 twin turbo with 400 horsepower with IRS would price out around $40,000 assuming similar pricing from a SHO; Hardly Mid level.

I presume you were not thinking $30K for the 550 TT GT500 either, as that would probably more like 50-60K.

The point in my line up was to keep mustangs affordable, not put them beyond the reach of anyone.

Although... I did not include the GT500 in my lineup.

I guess if you include the GT500 in my line up it would go

Entry level 2.0 Turbo with 210hp 6 speed IRS @ 22K
Mid level V6 with 300 hp 6 speed and IRS@ 25K
Then bring in the 5.0 @ 400 for 30K
GT500 with S/C 5.0 @ 550 for 45K
I suggested this exact lineup a while back...With this new 305hp V6, there is plenty of room for a more "entry level" model for the secretaries and rental car agencies that don't need 305hp or LSDs.
Old 12/21/09, 07:48 PM
  #47  
Team Mustang Source
 
jsaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Posts: 2,357
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by laserred38
I suggested this exact lineup a while back...With this new 305hp V6, there is plenty of room for a more "entry level" model for the secretaries and rental car agencies that don't need 305hp or LSDs.
Problem is that 'base' turbo four would likely cost at least as much to build as the V6 model does. Ford might do it anyway if they thought it would let them move the V6 further upmarket, but I seriously doubt it would actually cost less to build.
Old 12/21/09, 08:52 PM
  #48  
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Zastava_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would like to see base 3.5L (263 hp), 3.5L EcoBoost (365 hp), 5.0L (412 hp) and whatever do put in a Shelby.

New 2.0L EcoBoost (230 hp, 240 lb ft torque) just wouldn't be right for a Mustang. Ford should offer it in a new 2011 Focus.
Old 12/22/09, 12:38 AM
  #49  
Legacy TMS Member
 
laserred38's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,047
Received 166 Likes on 141 Posts
Originally Posted by Red Star
I would like to see base 3.5L (263 hp), 3.5L EcoBoost (365 hp), 5.0L (412 hp) and whatever do put in a Shelby.

New 2.0L EcoBoost (230 hp, 240 lb ft torque) just wouldn't be right for a Mustang. Ford should offer it in a new 2011 Focus.
I suggested this as well. Either way, I see a market for a more "base" level Mustang than a 305hp V6. Maybe it's just me though. Obviousy times are changing.
Old 12/27/09, 09:26 PM
  #50  
legacy Tms Member
 
ford4v429's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 9, 2005
Location: N.E. Ohio
Posts: 2,591
Received 58 Likes on 27 Posts
personally, I think if they offer a 4 cylinder, they need to do the 'pony' thing again like in the pintos...a max MPG variant that will maybe not be very fast, BUT max economy possible at a low cost (and probably still more powerful/cheaper than a prius...)
I think with todays technology 45-50 mpg wouldnt be out of the question- if power level kept low enough, perhaps younger crowd could afford insurance easier too.

with the coming 35 mpg ecoboost v6, the only real reasons for a 4 would be cost and substantial MPG- both could get a lot more entry level sales to boost volume- every Ford sold is one less buyer for the competition right? why not offer a stripper mustang with fiesta MPG?
Old 12/27/09, 09:40 PM
  #51  
Cobra Member
 
Wolfsburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 11, 2007
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd like to see Ford bring back the Mustang "Sprint" moniker. I think that would go well with a small displacement, runabout variant of the Mustang.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ecostang
'10-14 V6 Modifications
1661
11/3/22 08:50 PM
jc46002003
Repair and Service Help
70
4/15/16 03:00 PM
ClayP
2010-2014 Mustang
12
8/3/15 09:00 PM
roushcollection
Auto Shows and Events
0
7/28/15 02:08 PM
carid
Vendor Showcase
3
7/17/15 05:40 PM



Quick Reply: I want a Hyundai style engine line up for 2014



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:49 AM.