Horsepower Unleashed – Motivating the All-New Ford Mustang
I'd like to see some tests done comparing the V6 and Ecoboost engines up in the high country out west! If they perform as I'd expect at 5000 feet or so (and if Ford could get the word out with proper advertising), the Ecoboost Mustang could be a big seller in the Western states. 
*Provided the Ecoboost version does NOT cost as much as the GT!

*Provided the Ecoboost version does NOT cost as much as the GT!
rev matching is needed on the auto.
please keep it off of the manual, at least by default.
If you want to pay extra for it? then fine. Or, if its always off w/ an on switch (opposite traction control etc) then I suppose that is OK too. I'd hate to have this on by default as I would turn it off every single time I get in and drive the car (I do this already selecting sport mode...)
But really rev matching w/ heal-toe is super easy. you just need to practice. It can be 2nd nature really. super easy on the street too since you aren't dive bombing the corners and zing the engine sky high before each corner entry.
That is along the lines of saying "give us an automatic clutch, so I don't have to shift.." then buy an automatic
If you aren't using paddle shifters, you don't need rev matching software.
please keep it off of the manual, at least by default.
If you want to pay extra for it? then fine. Or, if its always off w/ an on switch (opposite traction control etc) then I suppose that is OK too. I'd hate to have this on by default as I would turn it off every single time I get in and drive the car (I do this already selecting sport mode...)
But really rev matching w/ heal-toe is super easy. you just need to practice. It can be 2nd nature really. super easy on the street too since you aren't dive bombing the corners and zing the engine sky high before each corner entry.
That is along the lines of saying "give us an automatic clutch, so I don't have to shift.." then buy an automatic
If you aren't using paddle shifters, you don't need rev matching software.
Good news is that they're keeping the 3.7 which means more HP mods are coming. I think a lot of aftermarket companies were waiting to make sure.
Ecoboost will sound like crap and it's pretty much maxed out anyway.
Ecoboost will sound like crap and it's pretty much maxed out anyway.
After looking at the data provided by Ford for the 2.3 liter four, it is apparent the engine is made to live with far more than 305 horsepower. Forged crank and forged connecting rods indicate to me the engine may produce at least 350 horsepower. You all know Ford Motorsports will most likely offer a larger turbo to kick out 400 horsepower. Remember Ford is offering the ecoboost 2.3 as a premium to the V6. So, the ecoboost will be in a league above the v6.
Isn't that just completely un-nessesary? Wasn't double-clutching for tranny's with no synchronizers? Essentially, rev match these days is just keeping the downshift smooth for zipping out of turns, right? Also, probably easier on your clutch maybe. Right?
Bet my synchro's look brand new at 25k. And my 83 F150 trans is still shifting great at 254k.
Last edited by cdynaco; Dec 9, 2013 at 11:42 AM.
i dont understand why when someone wants a feature someone else doesnt want it is taken it as an insult and then needs to put down the person who wants that feature... just because you double clutch out of habit doesnt mean everyone wants to rev match every downshift and wouldnt appreciate a computer doing it most of the time. At no point did i tell you you needed to convert to this feature or your driving style would be incorrect. however that is what your response was to me. we are all mustang fans here no need to hate.
A 65 big block vette would be a blast to drive, but a modern c7 with an auto and all manner of computer helpers will smoke the hell out of it and no doubt be a different, but equally involving kind of fun.
To the purist, I salute you. To the explorer of modern performance tech, you also. I understand that others won't enjoy cars in exactly the same manner that i do and that's ok. It makes conversations more interesting.
Just to chime in on this, I have to agree. I don't get the vitriol. A statement was made which was pro tech. Instantly there is attack. Why? Modern tech has made cars faster, better handling, improved mpg.... I absolutely get enjoying expressing yourself via throttle, contact patch, steering wheel and skill. But, this is hardly a reason to be insulting to someone who enjoys his performance in a different manner. A 65 big block vette would be a blast to drive, but a modern c7 with an auto and all manner of computer helpers will smoke the hell out of it and no doubt be a different, but equally involving kind of fun. To the purist, I salute you. To the explorer of modern performance tech, you also. I understand that others won't enjoy cars in exactly the same manner that i do and that's ok. It makes conversations more interesting.
I'd like to see some tests done comparing the V6 and Ecoboost engines up in the high country out west! If they perform as I'd expect at 5000 feet or so (and if Ford could get the word out with proper advertising), the Ecoboost Mustang could be a big seller in the Western states. 
*Provided the Ecoboost version does NOT cost as much as the GT!

*Provided the Ecoboost version does NOT cost as much as the GT!
The ecoboost 2.0 sounds better then the awful and hollow sounding V6.
After looking at the data provided by Ford for the 2.3 liter four, it is apparent the engine is made to live with far more than 305 horsepower. Forged crank and forged connecting rods indicate to me the engine may produce at least 350 horsepower. You all know Ford Motorsports will most likely offer a larger turbo to kick out 400 horsepower. Remember Ford is offering the ecoboost 2.3 as a premium to the V6. So, the ecoboost will be in a league above the v6.
We are talking Mustang here. An American driver's car. That's why some made the comments. If you want auto everything, get an auto, get a secretary's model. But don't mess with our driver's experience for those of us that do actually want to drive our machine - as in actually shift manually.
IMO.
Last edited by cdynaco; Dec 9, 2013 at 12:50 PM.
I can understand greater tech options, but I agree, not at the expense of a full driving experience. For example, if all the autos came with the paddles no matter what, I'd pass. I get nothing but a pain in the behind from paddles AKA childhood memories.
i dont understand why when someone wants a feature someone else doesnt want it is taken it as an insult and then needs to put down the person who wants that feature... just because you double clutch out of habit doesnt mean everyone wants to rev match every downshift and wouldnt appreciate a computer doing it most of the time. At no point did i tell you you needed to convert to this feature or your driving style would be incorrect. however that is what your response was to me. we are all mustang fans here no need to hate.
Vitriol and attack? Geez. That's pretty extreme. If you take it that far, that's on you. Remember, the internet doesn't express as well as in person.
We are talking Mustang here. An American driver's car. That's why some made the comments. If you want auto everything, get an auto, get a secretary's model. But don't mess with our driver's experience for those of us that do actually want to drive our machine - as in actually shift manually.
IMO.
We are talking Mustang here. An American driver's car. That's why some made the comments. If you want auto everything, get an auto, get a secretary's model. But don't mess with our driver's experience for those of us that do actually want to drive our machine - as in actually shift manually.
IMO.
Sort of like tpms. A few lazy dweebs that were too dumb to check their tires put this crap on the rest of us.
Again if he wants an automatic driving experience, buy an auto. Don't wreck our manny tranny experience.
Last edited by cdynaco; Dec 9, 2013 at 05:05 PM.






