2015 - 2023 MUSTANG Discuss everything 2015-2023 S550 Mustang
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Horsepower Unleashed – Motivating the All-New Ford Mustang

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 5, 2013 | 01:09 PM
  #21  
Ronin38's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 27, 2010
Posts: 754
Likes: 1
I'd like to see some tests done comparing the V6 and Ecoboost engines up in the high country out west! If they perform as I'd expect at 5000 feet or so (and if Ford could get the word out with proper advertising), the Ecoboost Mustang could be a big seller in the Western states.

*Provided the Ecoboost version does NOT cost as much as the GT!
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2013 | 01:13 PM
  #22  
y5e06's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: May 6, 2012
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
rev matching is needed on the auto.
please keep it off of the manual, at least by default.
If you want to pay extra for it? then fine. Or, if its always off w/ an on switch (opposite traction control etc) then I suppose that is OK too. I'd hate to have this on by default as I would turn it off every single time I get in and drive the car (I do this already selecting sport mode...)

But really rev matching w/ heal-toe is super easy. you just need to practice. It can be 2nd nature really. super easy on the street too since you aren't dive bombing the corners and zing the engine sky high before each corner entry.
That is along the lines of saying "give us an automatic clutch, so I don't have to shift.." then buy an automatic

If you aren't using paddle shifters, you don't need rev matching software.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2013 | 01:16 PM
  #23  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by rhumb
The difference between being a driver and being cargo.
lolol
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2013 | 06:57 PM
  #24  
Desi's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: November 1, 2006
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Has there been any mention of the weight of the 2.3l? I noticed they said 305+, so not sure how big of a + it will be but weight will be a major facor in it too. I can't wait to see one on the track.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 07:04 AM
  #25  
Rando's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: August 3, 2012
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Good news is that they're keeping the 3.7 which means more HP mods are coming. I think a lot of aftermarket companies were waiting to make sure.

Ecoboost will sound like crap and it's pretty much maxed out anyway.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 09:16 AM
  #26  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Originally Posted by Rando
Ecoboost will sound like crap and it's pretty much maxed out anyway.
You've heard it and know what the ALL-NEW 2.3L Eco is capable of?
Do tell.

It's ok, I'll wait.
.......
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 09:55 AM
  #27  
2 Go Snake's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: March 29, 2011
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 6
From: Minnesota
Smile

After looking at the data provided by Ford for the 2.3 liter four, it is apparent the engine is made to live with far more than 305 horsepower. Forged crank and forged connecting rods indicate to me the engine may produce at least 350 horsepower. You all know Ford Motorsports will most likely offer a larger turbo to kick out 400 horsepower. Remember Ford is offering the ecoboost 2.3 as a premium to the V6. So, the ecoboost will be in a league above the v6.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 10:57 AM
  #28  
Azure's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 25, 2012
Posts: 433
Likes: 6
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by cdynaco
palease

Why don't you buy a fusion?

I double clutch every upshift out of habit. Don't need a friggin computer driving for me.
Isn't that just completely un-nessesary? Wasn't double-clutching for tranny's with no synchronizers? Essentially, rev match these days is just keeping the downshift smooth for zipping out of turns, right? Also, probably easier on your clutch maybe. Right?
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 11:39 AM
  #29  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by Azure
Isn't that just completely un-nessesary? Wasn't double-clutching for tranny's with no synchronizers? Essentially, rev match these days is just keeping the downshift smooth for zipping out of turns, right? Also, probably easier on your clutch maybe. Right?
Just a gearhead thing. I like being in tune with my machine. Plus I've had to rebuild a few transmissions over the years and I've seen how beat used synchro's can be. Its just easier on the synchro's to bring the input shaft up to the output shaft's rpm, rather than just jamming on a downshift from 4-3 or 3-2. I know where the sound of my engine should be on each gear. It only takes a second.
Bet my synchro's look brand new at 25k. And my 83 F150 trans is still shifting great at 254k.

Last edited by cdynaco; Dec 9, 2013 at 11:42 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 12:03 PM
  #30  
eric n's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: July 27, 2004
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 2
From: Bakersfield, CA
Originally Posted by xlover
i dont understand why when someone wants a feature someone else doesnt want it is taken it as an insult and then needs to put down the person who wants that feature... just because you double clutch out of habit doesnt mean everyone wants to rev match every downshift and wouldnt appreciate a computer doing it most of the time. At no point did i tell you you needed to convert to this feature or your driving style would be incorrect. however that is what your response was to me. we are all mustang fans here no need to hate.
Just to chime in on this, I have to agree. I don't get the vitriol. A statement was made which was pro tech. Instantly there is attack. Why? Modern tech has made cars faster, better handling, improved mpg.... I absolutely get enjoying expressing yourself via throttle, contact patch, steering wheel and skill. But, this is hardly a reason to be insulting to someone who enjoys his performance in a different manner.

A 65 big block vette would be a blast to drive, but a modern c7 with an auto and all manner of computer helpers will smoke the hell out of it and no doubt be a different, but equally involving kind of fun.

To the purist, I salute you. To the explorer of modern performance tech, you also. I understand that others won't enjoy cars in exactly the same manner that i do and that's ok. It makes conversations more interesting.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 12:27 PM
  #31  
Mr. V's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 22, 2012
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 17
From: Ontario, California
Originally Posted by eric n
Just to chime in on this, I have to agree. I don't get the vitriol. A statement was made which was pro tech. Instantly there is attack. Why? Modern tech has made cars faster, better handling, improved mpg.... I absolutely get enjoying expressing yourself via throttle, contact patch, steering wheel and skill. But, this is hardly a reason to be insulting to someone who enjoys his performance in a different manner. A 65 big block vette would be a blast to drive, but a modern c7 with an auto and all manner of computer helpers will smoke the hell out of it and no doubt be a different, but equally involving kind of fun. To the purist, I salute you. To the explorer of modern performance tech, you also. I understand that others won't enjoy cars in exactly the same manner that i do and that's ok. It makes conversations more interesting.
I totally agree with everything you've said. I've come to realize on this site that many people either don't care to write in a less offensive manner but mean no disrespect or are just trying to be annoying for their amusement.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 12:33 PM
  #32  
Flagstang's Avatar
Spam Connoisseur
I got هَبوب‎ed
 
Joined: September 8, 2009
Posts: 9,651
Likes: 7
From: Sun City AZ
Originally Posted by Ronin38
I'd like to see some tests done comparing the V6 and Ecoboost engines up in the high country out west! If they perform as I'd expect at 5000 feet or so (and if Ford could get the word out with proper advertising), the Ecoboost Mustang could be a big seller in the Western states.

*Provided the Ecoboost version does NOT cost as much as the GT!
when I lived in flagstaff(8500 feet) the turbo cars(STI's and Evo's) did very well.

Originally Posted by Rando
Good news is that they're keeping the 3.7 which means more HP mods are coming. I think a lot of aftermarket companies were waiting to make sure.

Ecoboost will sound like crap and it's pretty much maxed out anyway.

The ecoboost 2.0 sounds better then the awful and hollow sounding V6.


Originally Posted by 2 Go Snake
After looking at the data provided by Ford for the 2.3 liter four, it is apparent the engine is made to live with far more than 305 horsepower. Forged crank and forged connecting rods indicate to me the engine may produce at least 350 horsepower. You all know Ford Motorsports will most likely offer a larger turbo to kick out 400 horsepower. Remember Ford is offering the ecoboost 2.3 as a premium to the V6. So, the ecoboost will be in a league above the v6.
The 2.0 ecoboost ford is putting in the ST is handling 350-480hp. I haven't heard of any major failures. I think a lot of people will have issue with the V6 motor being under the four banger.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 12:46 PM
  #33  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by Flagstang
I think a lot of people will have issue with the V6 motor being under the four banger.
Poor poor V6.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 12:49 PM
  #34  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by eric n
Just to chime in on this, I have to agree. I don't get the vitriol. A statement was made which was pro tech. Instantly there is attack.
Vitriol and attack? Geez. That's pretty extreme. If you take it that far, that's on you. Remember, the internet doesn't express as well as in person.

We are talking Mustang here. An American driver's car. That's why some made the comments. If you want auto everything, get an auto, get a secretary's model. But don't mess with our driver's experience for those of us that do actually want to drive our machine - as in actually shift manually.

IMO.

Last edited by cdynaco; Dec 9, 2013 at 12:50 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 12:59 PM
  #35  
Azure's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 25, 2012
Posts: 433
Likes: 6
From: Indiana
I can understand greater tech options, but I agree, not at the expense of a full driving experience. For example, if all the autos came with the paddles no matter what, I'd pass. I get nothing but a pain in the behind from paddles AKA childhood memories.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 01:22 PM
  #36  
AlsCobra's Avatar
A Man Just Needs Some....
 
Joined: April 9, 2011
Posts: 17,125
Likes: 34
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by xlover
i dont understand why when someone wants a feature someone else doesnt want it is taken it as an insult and then needs to put down the person who wants that feature... just because you double clutch out of habit doesnt mean everyone wants to rev match every downshift and wouldnt appreciate a computer doing it most of the time. At no point did i tell you you needed to convert to this feature or your driving style would be incorrect. however that is what your response was to me. we are all mustang fans here no need to hate.
Some people have a lot of passion when it comes to the purity of the Mustang. This is not a luxury car. This is not a European touring car. This is not a import rice rocket. This is a Mustang. If you want it to be any more than the name plate advertises, buy a different car. It makes me sick that the mustang has to please every potential sports coupe buyer. I remember getting excited in the early 90's because you could order a stripped down 5.0 stang with little to no options. Now we want the same car to provide a spa treatment with every drive and infect us with a European accent. That's just how some of us are built.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 03:29 PM
  #37  
eric n's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: July 27, 2004
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 2
From: Bakersfield, CA
Originally Posted by cdynaco
Vitriol and attack? Geez. That's pretty extreme. If you take it that far, that's on you. Remember, the internet doesn't express as well as in person.

We are talking Mustang here. An American driver's car. That's why some made the comments. If you want auto everything, get an auto, get a secretary's model. But don't mess with our driver's experience for those of us that do actually want to drive our machine - as in actually shift manually.

IMO.
"Why don't you buy a fusion?" to a mustang driver. You might as well have called his mother a *****! It was clearly an attack on his masculinity. Basically, it's saying, if you want this kind of electronic helper you don't deserve this manly a car. Perhaps even less kind would have been Prius, Fiat Abarth or a 6 cylinder Camaro.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 04:29 PM
  #38  
MRGTX's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: May 18, 2010
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 15
From: CT
Originally Posted by cdynaco
Vitriol and attack? Geez. That's pretty extreme. If you take it that far, that's on you. Remember, the internet doesn't express as well as in person.

....

IMO.
Making more friends?
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 04:58 PM
  #39  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by eric n
"Why don't you buy a fusion?" to a mustang driver. You might as well have called his mother a *****! It was clearly an attack on his masculinity.
Geez Eric - you really like taking things to an extreme. Had nothing to do with masculinity or orientation. Had to do with getting a tame city bred car rather than turning a hotrod Mustang into something most of us don't want.

Sort of like tpms. A few lazy dweebs that were too dumb to check their tires put this crap on the rest of us.

Again if he wants an automatic driving experience, buy an auto. Don't wreck our manny tranny experience.

Last edited by cdynaco; Dec 9, 2013 at 05:05 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 05:04 PM
  #40  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by MRGTX
Making more friends?
By the thousands.

I see you crawled out from your Connecticut rock. Why have you been hiding?

Last edited by cdynaco; Dec 9, 2013 at 05:06 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:43 PM.