GT350 intake?
#3
Considering it is a completely different motor, not just a tuning or stroking of the GT motor, it should hardly be surprising that the intake wouldn't fit. That would be like the V6 guys complaining the GT intake didn't fit.
#5
Thread Starter
Legacy TMS Member
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,047
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
GT350 intake?
Originally Posted by AWmustang
Considering it is a completely different motor, not just a tuning or stroking of the GT motor, it should hardly be surprising that the intake wouldn't fit. That would be like the V6 guys complaining the GT intake didn't fit.
#6
I was under the impression that it was originally going to be coyote based, but then that was scrapped. I appear to have been misinformed. If it truly is coyote based, then it would be reasonable to expect there was a possibility it would fit.
#7
The impression I get is coyote 1.5 - its coyote based - but just different enough that virtually nothing worthwhile will crossover.
#9
What could have been if the coyote wasn't constrained by the bore centers on the older engines.
Ford did a really good job with the constraints they imposed on themselves and the coyote is a great engine but this thing would have been a monster if they could have based the engine around a 112mm bore center allowing much bigger bores in the range of 102mm to 105mm with a lot of metal between the walls to spare allowing much larger displacements limited only by deck height which would have been an easy change.
In such a scenario Ford could with say the Voodoo's 92mm stroke on a 105mm bore produce a 6.4 liter engine. Same deck height just a tad bit longer on the long axis of the block.
Power would improve across the board not only from the increase in displacement but the extra breathing afforded by the bigger bore (something Ford exploited by using a 94mm bore on the Voodoo).
Last edited by bob; 8/15/15 at 10:13 AM.
#10
Sort of a distant cousin and constrained by the need to work on that same tooling.
What could have been if the coyote wasn't constrained by the bore centers on the older engines.
Ford did a really good job with the constraints they imposed on themselves and the coyote is a great engine but this thing would have been a monster if they could have based the engine around a 112mm bore center allowing much bigger bores in the range of 102mm to 105mm with a lot of metal between the walls to spare allowing much larger displacements limited only by deck height which would have been an easy change.
In such a scenario Ford could with say the Voodoo's 92mm stroke on a 105mm bore produce a 6.4 liter engine. Same deck height just a tad bit longer on the long axis of the block.
Power would improve across the board not only from the increase in displacement but the extra breathing afforded by the bigger bore (something Ford exploited by using a 94mm bore on the Voodoo).
What could have been if the coyote wasn't constrained by the bore centers on the older engines.
Ford did a really good job with the constraints they imposed on themselves and the coyote is a great engine but this thing would have been a monster if they could have based the engine around a 112mm bore center allowing much bigger bores in the range of 102mm to 105mm with a lot of metal between the walls to spare allowing much larger displacements limited only by deck height which would have been an easy change.
In such a scenario Ford could with say the Voodoo's 92mm stroke on a 105mm bore produce a 6.4 liter engine. Same deck height just a tad bit longer on the long axis of the block.
Power would improve across the board not only from the increase in displacement but the extra breathing afforded by the bigger bore (something Ford exploited by using a 94mm bore on the Voodoo).
#11
Too bad Ford doesn't have deep pockets like VAG, you would probably see some real crazy stuff cing out of FPG ( isn't that what it's called now Ford Performance Group???? )
Also to bad if the port spacing and shape are different, probably with a short runner intake like the CJ manifold and full exhaust the Voodor would probably hit 600 hp with just a few more RPM.
Last edited by bob; 8/15/15 at 03:13 PM.
#12
I'm not 100% sure but I remember this being answered by someone within Ford. I've been searching for it but keep coming up empty handed so I'm just going off memory. But that person (May have) said both the intake and heads would fit on the coyote. Of course you would need crossplane crankshaft camshafts, but it would work. It does make a lot of sense.
#17
#18
Thread Starter
Legacy TMS Member
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,047
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by bob
How is the overall average power gain through the rev range?
http://www.mustang6g.com/?p=8260
#19
They are not picking up 60whp. I've seen the dynos of baseline & after install. After install, there is no noticeable increase in whp until the factory tune takes a dive @ 6500 rpm. The new intake keeps pulling to around 7300 rpm. The difference between the PEAK whp of these is less than 25whp. The 60 number that people keep throwing around is comparing the factory setup to the intake @ 7300 rpm, WELL AFTER the factory tune shuts down & the driver would have shifted.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DerekShiekhi
GT350
1
9/29/15 05:35 AM