'10-14 V6 Modifications Place to discuss 2010 V6 modifications

Hellion 3.7L turbo kit

Old Oct 28, 2013 | 10:37 PM
  #21  
Krohn's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 11, 2012
Posts: 981
Likes: 4
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by future9er24
except for all the driving scenes they used a 351W based engine
Did they really?! Cause if so, that's awesome!

I would feel like at the end of the movie (like they do in shows) they should have...
"during the making of this movie, no Mustangs actually had a fart can"

I think a turbo on the 3.7 would be sick!
It already has *****, why not give it even bigger *****!
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2013 | 10:47 PM
  #22  
CCTking's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: December 9, 2011
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 6
From: Corpus Christi, TX
Originally Posted by Krohn
Did they really?! Cause if so, that's awesome! I would feel like at the end of the movie (like they do in shows) they should have... "during the making of this movie, no Mustangs actually had a fart can" I think a turbo on the 3.7 would be sick! It already has *****, why not give it even bigger *****!
300-310 = pony *****
400-450 = stallion crushers
950 (supposed kit hp limit) = All 7 Dragon Ballz
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2013 | 06:52 AM
  #23  
slostang's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 24, 2011
Posts: 755
Likes: 1
From: Delaware
SOOOO much poor information on this post.

That kit won't make 950, the turbo isn't even rated to make that number lol

Just because the kit "can" make a number don't think you won't need to add more injector, bigger IC, more pump, add another BOV and gate.....the list goes on

That kit, on a stock motor will make 400ish I bet.

You can't add LT's on a forward mounted turbo car
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2013 | 09:22 AM
  #24  
CCTking's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: December 9, 2011
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 6
From: Corpus Christi, TX
Originally Posted by slostang
SOOOO much poor information on this post. That kit won't make 950, the turbo isn't even rated to make that number lol Just because the kit "can" make a number don't think you won't need to add more injector, bigger IC, more pump, add another BOV and gate.....the list goes on That kit, on a stock motor will make 400ish I bet. You can't add LT's on a forward mounted turbo car
Well of course youd have to be able to add the parts to support such a system. Im pretty sure most folks on here dont believe the 950hp potential either.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2013 | 10:17 AM
  #25  
slostang's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 24, 2011
Posts: 755
Likes: 1
From: Delaware
Originally Posted by CCTking
Well of course youd have to be able to add the parts to support such a system. Im pretty sure most folks on here dont believe the 950hp potential either.
No, the turbo physically can't make that number.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2013 | 12:22 PM
  #26  
southcarolina12's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 13, 2012
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by slostang
No, the turbo physically can't make that number.
the 67mm precision CEA6768 turbo it comes with is rated at 935hp and the optional 76mm precision CEA7675 turbo is rated at 1150hp.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2013 | 12:23 PM
  #27  
southcarolina12's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 13, 2012
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
but yes i know you cant just throw it on there and say "make 950hp" and it will just make it....
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2013 | 12:24 PM
  #28  
CCTking's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: December 9, 2011
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 6
From: Corpus Christi, TX
Originally Posted by southcarolina12
but yes i know you cant just throw it on there and say "make 950hp" and it will just make it....
If only it were that easy
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2013 | 12:28 PM
  #29  
2011 Kona Blue's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: November 26, 2011
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 4
Just slap a pro charger on it with 8 pounds of boost and you will be over 400 rwhp. Done, easy install, bolt on, easy peasey. The supercharger puts no load on the engine under normal driving conditions. The car is not making any boost until you nail it and the rpm's go above 3k or even higher. In order for my car to hit 3k in rpm's under normal driving conditions I have to be traveling around 105 mph which I have 3:73 gears.

With a few bolt on mods, one can easily be rocking 425 to 430 rwhp and call it a day. That's pretty darn awesome for a sixer. Lol. Will smoke 99 percent of peoples daily drivers. One could even take on stock 12 and under Gt500's all day long and keep with them.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2013 | 12:42 PM
  #30  
slostang's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 24, 2011
Posts: 755
Likes: 1
From: Delaware
Originally Posted by southcarolina12
the 67mm precision CEA6768 turbo it comes with is rated at 935hp and the optional 76mm precision CEA7675 turbo is rated at 1150hp.
Well I am aware the 7675 can make it, I am buying one for my 5.0

But my point, that sounds like a direct quote from precision and it isn't 950 like they state....
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2013 | 12:45 PM
  #31  
slostang's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 24, 2011
Posts: 755
Likes: 1
From: Delaware
Originally Posted by 2011 Kona Blue
Just slap a pro charger on it with 8 pounds of boost and you will be over 400 rwhp. Done, easy install, bolt on, easy peasey. The supercharger puts no load on the engine under normal driving conditions. The car is not making any boost until you nail it and the rpm's go above 3k or even higher. In order for my car to hit 3k in rpm's under normal driving conditions I have to be traveling around 105 mph which I have 3:73 gears.

With a few bolt on mods, one can easily be rocking 425 to 430 rwhp and call it a day. That's pretty darn awesome for a sixer. Lol. Will smoke 99 percent of peoples daily drivers. One could even take on stock 12 and under Gt500's all day long and keep with them.
Incorrect, the pro charger is run off the snout of the crank aka "always on"

You are confusing the characteristics of a turbo
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2013 | 01:09 PM
  #32  
southcarolina12's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 13, 2012
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by slostang
Well I am aware the 7675 can make it, I am buying one for my 5.0

But my point, that sounds like a direct quote from precision and it isn't 950 like they state....
american muscle just quoted the 400-950hp rating from hellion but hellion has the optional 76mm turbo that you can get instead of the 67mm one but american muscle doesnt have that option. the 67mm turbo is plenty big enough to push air to the 3.7 and make around 700hp which is probably more than these thing will hold.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2013 | 04:21 PM
  #33  
future9er24's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 18,616
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Originally Posted by Krohn
Did they really?! Cause if so, that's awesome!

I would feel like at the end of the movie (like they do in shows) they should have...
"during the making of this movie, no Mustangs actually had a fart can"

I think a turbo on the 3.7 would be sick!
It already has *****, why not give it even bigger *****!
I was super stoked when I discovered this a few years ago.

http://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/f...d-mustang.html

Sorry for going offtopic everyone
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2013 | 05:12 PM
  #34  
2011 Kona Blue's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: November 26, 2011
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by slostang
Incorrect, the pro charger is run off the snout of the crank aka "always on"

You are confusing the characteristics of a turbo
I was told by my local performance shop by the dyno operator the pro charger is set to where the boost goes out the vacuum. No boost is going to the engine unless under load and high rpm's. The pro charger is designed to put no load on the engine unless above a certain rpm level. That's at least what I was told because the type of supercharger the procharger is.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2013 | 05:39 PM
  #35  
Krohn's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 11, 2012
Posts: 981
Likes: 4
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by future9er24
I was super stoked when I discovered this a few years ago.

http://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/f...d-mustang.html

Sorry for going offtopic everyone
I think I may have started this misdirection... but I feel it is slightly relevant! lol
I am sad though that the article read that the Nissan motor was actually faster. :/

Even still, turbo that sixer!
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2013 | 05:56 PM
  #36  
The_Munk's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 3, 2012
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: Cali
Originally Posted by Krohn
430whp... 30+mpg.... Turbo-back exhaust sound... mustang body? Go for it!
although when I think turbo Mustang... one has to think...

Tokyo Drift!
Nissan 240sx engine though lol
Wasn't it a RB26T?
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2013 | 06:24 PM
  #37  
2011 Kona Blue's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: November 26, 2011
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by Krohn

I think I may have started this misdirection... but I feel it is slightly relevant! lol
I am sad though that the article read that the Nissan motor was actually faster. :/

Even still, turbo that sixer!
Turbo that b otch bro. Lmao. It will be one bad a$$ sixer with the T. Lol
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2013 | 06:44 PM
  #38  
CCTking's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: December 9, 2011
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 6
From: Corpus Christi, TX
Prochargers are just so loud all the time though... Kind of a drawback to me because i really like the sleeper look/style
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2013 | 07:49 PM
  #39  
southcarolina12's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 13, 2012
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
ive been looking around and it seems that the procharger takes about 15-20% of the power it makes to turn it. so if the engine makes 1000hp it takes 150-200 hp to turn the procharger. so by going turbo i should be able to make 15-20% more power to the wheels while still being safe. that would be around 540rwhp while having the same engine strain as a 450rwhp procharged engine.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2013 | 08:01 PM
  #40  
2011 Kona Blue's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: November 26, 2011
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by southcarolina12
ive been looking around and it seems that the procharger takes about 15-20% of the power it makes to turn it. so if the engine makes 1000hp it takes 150-200 hp to turn the procharger. so by going turbo i should be able to make 15-20% more power to the wheels while still being safe. that would be around 540rwhp while having the same engine strain as a 450rwhp procharged engine.
So your saying a turbo with 8 pounds boost will make more rwhp than a supercharger on 8 pounds boost. Its my understanding for the 3.7 engine the pro charger on 8 pounds will make around 400 rwhp give or take. What rwhp will the turbo make on 8 pounds boost to the 3.7?
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:44 PM.