5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

What do you think about these numbers... too low??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 22, 2015 | 09:04 AM
  #1  
Speedwagon's Avatar
Thread Starter
V6 Member
 
Joined: August 26, 2014
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: USA
What do you think about these numbers... too low??

Spent most of Saturday with some friends on the dyno... What do you guys think... ??

My mods are as follows: Boss 302 IM, AirRaid CAI, Kooks 1 7/8" LT headers and Hi Flow catted H mid pipe, Corsa Extreme Cat back Mufflers, 3.73 gears, 305/35/20 Mickey Thompson Street Cmp in the rear and 275/35/20 Nitto 555 in the front, Lund 93 Oct tune

Reply
Old Mar 22, 2015 | 09:08 AM
  #2  
Stage_3's Avatar
Roush Forum Stalker
 
Joined: March 9, 2013
Posts: 11,140
Likes: 1,749
From: Massachusetts
Yeah,.....I'm not sure what's wrong, but those are almost stock rear wheels numbers, no? They seem on the low side. Especially with a Lund tune. How does the car run?
Is that dyno calibrated? Are your mods complimentary to each other? Those play a huge factor.
Good luck!
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2015 | 11:21 AM
  #3  
Speedwagon's Avatar
Thread Starter
V6 Member
 
Joined: August 26, 2014
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by Stage_3
Yeah,.....I'm not sure what's wrong, but those are almost stock rear wheels numbers, no? They seem on the low side. Especially with a Lund tune. How does the car run?
Is that dyno calibrated? Are your mods complimentary to each other? Those play a huge factor.
Good luck!
Yeah.. Im going to send the results back to Lund to see WTF is up ..
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2015 | 01:14 PM
  #4  
Music man in Pcola's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: August 20, 2012
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: Pensacola, FL
My 2012 Auto got 376 rwhp with only Bassani X-pipe, Flowmaster Hushpower and a Bama tune with a C & L CAI...so something is definitely not right. Good luck.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2015 | 06:16 PM
  #5  
2014GHIGGT's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 10, 2014
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: Manchester, NH
It's just a number. Not all Dyno's are created equal. I have seen some cars come off the Dyno with 300HP and run an 11 second quarter mile. Numbers can lie. The true test is to see what kind of times it pulls. People get too worked up over a dyno number. I have seen Dyno queen's pull of some awesome Dyno numbers and run ****ty quarter mile times, and wheel spin wasn't an issue. Do you want a track car or a Dyno queen? The only thing a Dyno is good for is to tune and check how your tune is under load.

When you tune a car on a dyno, there are only two things that happen. First you insure the fuel air curve is spot on. Dyno's are good for checking this under a load. Next is to set ignition timing. Typically you start a car on a dyno by retarding the ignition by about 4 degrees. Then with each pull you advance two degrees. You keep doing this until the HP no longer jumps up with each change in ignition timing. Once you get to that point, you set the timing back to the pull before. It's that easy. Dyno's are a crappy way to get a true HP reading. A dyno operator can just about make the Dyno give you any number you want. All you want to know is if your tune is setup up for optimum performance. A dyno accomplishes this well. Again isn't a great way to measure HP. Of course we all get wowed when someone pulls a high number but the reality is one car that dyno's at 400HP may kick the pants in on another car that pulls 500 HP. Assuming you compare cars of similar weight, etc. Again it's just a number.

If you want to know how fast your car is going to be, run it at the track. You'll find out how strong your setup is.

Last edited by 2014GHIGGT; Mar 23, 2015 at 06:20 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2015 | 06:50 PM
  #6  
Speedwagon's Avatar
Thread Starter
V6 Member
 
Joined: August 26, 2014
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by 2014GHIGGT
It's just a number. Not all Dyno's are created equal. I have seen some cars come off the Dyno with 300HP and run an 11 second quarter mile. Numbers can lie. The true test is to see what kind of times it pulls. People get too worked up over a dyno number. I have seen Dyno queen's pull of some awesome Dyno numbers and run ****ty quarter mile times, and wheel spin wasn't an issue. Do you want a track car or a Dyno queen? The only thing a Dyno is good for is to tune and check how your tune is under load.

When you tune a car on a dyno, there are only two things that happen. First you insure the fuel air curve is spot on. Dyno's are good for checking this under a load. Next is to set ignition timing. Typically you start a car on a dyno by retarding the ignition by about 4 degrees. Then with each pull you advance two degrees. You keep doing this until the HP no longer jumps up with each change in ignition timing. Once you get to that point, you set the timing back to the pull before. It's that easy. Dyno's are a crappy way to get a true HP reading. A dyno operator can just about make the Dyno give you any number you want. All you want to know is if your tune is setup up for optimum performance. A dyno accomplishes this well. Again isn't a great way to measure HP. Of course we all get wowed when someone pulls a high number but the reality is one car that dyno's at 400HP may kick the pants in on another car that pulls 500 HP. Assuming you compare cars of similar weight, etc. Again it's just a number.

If you want to know how fast your car is going to be, run it at the track. You'll find out how strong your setup is.
Thanks bro.. All I want is my car to run to the max under my tune. Thats it.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2015 | 08:41 PM
  #7  
2014GHIGGT's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 10, 2014
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: Manchester, NH
Originally Posted by Speedwagon
Thanks bro.. All I want is my car to run to the max under my tune. Thats it.
Anytime man. Most believe the dyno to be the end all be all, and it isn't. It's just a tool to dial a tune in.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2015 | 08:50 PM
  #8  
Gabe's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: August 7, 2011
Posts: 5,246
Likes: 567
From: NC
Sounds like the car was run in 4th gear ... should've been 5th which is 1:1 in these cars.
Also, those guys talking in the video sound like they have no idea about these cars.
I would recommend you go elsewhere.

380/327 is waaayyy too low for that combo ... on a dynojet you should be at about 420+ rwhp
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2015 | 01:23 AM
  #9  
El Coyote GT/CS's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 20, 2013
Posts: 290
Likes: 6
From: So Cal
Originally Posted by Speedwagon
Yeah.. Im going to send the results back to Lund to see WTF is up ..
He will probably want to see the data log to check things out with the tune.

Originally Posted by 2014GHIGGT
It's just a number. Not all Dyno's are created equal.

If you want to know how fast your car is going to be, run it at the track. You'll find out how strong your setup is.
True. You might consider doing dyno runs before and after your mods to see what increase you were able to achieve. Other than tuning, that is where dyno numbers are most useful.

Originally Posted by Gabe
Sounds like the car was run in 4th gear ... should've been 5th which is 1:1 in these cars.

380/327 is waaayyy too low for that combo ... on a dynojet you should be at about 420+ rwhp
4th or 5th gear doesn't really matter that much. But I would expect to see a little more out of it. Maybe their calibration was slightly off?
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2015 | 04:35 AM
  #10  
2014GHIGGT's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 10, 2014
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: Manchester, NH
Originally Posted by El Coyote GT/CS
True. You might consider doing dyno runs before and after your mods to see what increase you were able to achieve. Other than tuning, that is where dyno numbers are most useful.
Very true, provided you use the same dyne between mods. Like conducting an experiment. You need to keep everything the same except for what changed.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2015 | 05:31 AM
  #11  
Gabe's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: August 7, 2011
Posts: 5,246
Likes: 567
From: NC
Originally Posted by El Coyote GT/CS
...

4th or 5th gear doesn't really matter that much. But I would expect to see a little more out of it. Maybe their calibration was slightly off?
See this thread ... http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forum...-5th-gear.html

Guy went from 392 to 407 rwhp by going from 4th to 5th gear on the dyno.
That's a 15 rwhp difference ... I'd say it matters more than you might think.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2015 | 05:51 AM
  #12  
tom281's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: October 8, 2005
Posts: 12,395
Likes: 29
From: Medina county, OH
There are so many factors that can screw with the numbers. Correct calibration, gear ran in, rear end gear, even wheels and tires make a difference. My old blue car would show nearly a 20 horse difference between my street tire/wheel combo vs my race tire/wheel combo. On the same day.

These guys are right the dyno is only a tool. And to what was already said me personally I would find a different shop that knows the Coyote cars.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2015 | 04:15 PM
  #13  
El Coyote GT/CS's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 20, 2013
Posts: 290
Likes: 6
From: So Cal
Originally Posted by Gabe
See this thread ... http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forum...-5th-gear.html

Guy went from 392 to 407 rwhp by going from 4th to 5th gear on the dyno.
That's a 15 rwhp difference ... I'd say it matters more than you might think.
Normally you would pick up a little horsepower on a 4th vs 5th gear run, but not much. It really depends on how the load against the rollers is being measured since the dyno can compute the drive ratio (engine RPM vs wheel speed). Different dynos use different methods of load measurement. That's interesting the horsepower readings were the inverse of normal in that thread...calibration problem?
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2015 | 06:42 PM
  #14  
FromZto5's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: September 24, 2011
Posts: 10,141
Likes: 172
Originally Posted by Gabe
See this thread ... http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forum...-5th-gear.html Guy went from 392 to 407 rwhp by going from 4th to 5th gear on the dyno. That's a 15 rwhp difference ... I'd say it matters more than you might think.
Yes of course it matters. You need to run it on 1:1 ratio. Gabe's right. Numbers will be off otherwise if not calibrated correctly.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2015 | 12:46 AM
  #15  
El Coyote GT/CS's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 20, 2013
Posts: 290
Likes: 6
From: So Cal
Originally Posted by FromZto5
Yes of course it matters. You need to run it on 1:1 ratio. Gabe's right. Numbers will be off otherwise if not calibrated correctly.
I have to disagree with the 1:1 ratio premiss. But this can be a very complex subject to discuss/explain. So I will submit the the quandary of two cars being dyno'd; one has a 3.15 rear gear, and the other has 4.10's. So do you run each in 4th gear (~1:1)??? Hmmm...
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2015 | 06:14 AM
  #16  
Glenn's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: August 7, 2006
Posts: 16,113
Likes: 789
From: In Boredom
What did Lund have to say?
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2015 | 06:57 AM
  #17  
FromZto5's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: September 24, 2011
Posts: 10,141
Likes: 172
I just watched the video again... definitely take it to another shop. "IT SOUNDS GOOD!!!!!!!!!"

Your 93 Lund (one of the best) should put you at least at 400whp. 380whp is almost what stock 5.0's put down.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2015 | 06:27 AM
  #18  
Glenn's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: August 7, 2006
Posts: 16,113
Likes: 789
From: In Boredom
UPDATES??
Reply
Old May 1, 2015 | 12:40 PM
  #19  
Coyote5-0's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: May 31, 2013
Posts: 2,144
Likes: 51
From: Indianapolis
I wonder whatever happened....

So what do these cars put down typically stock? 375?
Reply
Old May 1, 2015 | 12:47 PM
  #20  
FromZto5's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: September 24, 2011
Posts: 10,141
Likes: 172
^ anywhere between 350 and 375, depending on conditions that day, dyno, correction factors, etc.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Airborne42
2005-2009 Mustang
1
Sep 24, 2015 11:01 AM
BigHoss
2005-2009 Mustang
0
Sep 21, 2015 10:03 AM
samjluck
5.0L GT Modifications
7
Sep 17, 2015 10:24 PM
Fred_Garvin
2010-2014 Mustang
4
Sep 17, 2015 04:10 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:14 AM.