5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Springs: Steeda Ultralite vs Steeda Sports

Old Feb 3, 2011 | 11:08 AM
  #1  
Ivan 5.0's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 21, 2010
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
Springs: Steeda Ultralite vs Steeda Sports

For street use, which spring - ultralite or sport - would you recommend and why?
  • Which spring offers the better performance of the two?
  • Which spring offers the better ride quality of the two?
Steeda Ultralite: 1.2" front lowered / 1.4" rear lowered

Steeda Sports: 1.0" front lowered / 1.25" rear lowered

Reply
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 11:10 AM
  #2  
sam strano's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 28, 2008
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: Brookville, PA
I sell both... do you want the car lower or not? I prefer Sports myself, the balance and all is very similar, just a bit less low and a touch better riding vs. the Ultralites. I carry a lot more Sports in stock, but I also get some Ultralites in too (in fact I just ordered some for my next stocking order).
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 11:12 AM
  #3  
Ivan 5.0's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 21, 2010
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
Originally Posted by sam strano
I sell both... do you want the car lower or not? I prefer Sports myself, the balance and all is very similar, just a bit less low and a touch better riding vs. the Ultralites. I carry a lot more Sports in stock, but I also get some Ultralites in too (in fact I just ordered some for my next stocking order).
Lower is preferable from the two choices; as long as the performance (most important) and ride quality is not compromised compared to the Sports.

Last edited by Ivan 5.0; Feb 3, 2011 at 11:52 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 02:05 PM
  #4  
sam strano's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 28, 2008
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: Brookville, PA
The ride on Ultralites isn't bad, there are many worse for that.... but they are a little firmer. I don't see any reason based on your want of the slightly greater drop to not go that way. Again, it's not like I have anything against them--that's why I carry them too.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 02:10 PM
  #5  
Ministang's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 11, 2006
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
I've been pretty happy with my Ultra-Lites paired with Koni sports. I wanted a little lower and stiffer since I autocross my Mustang, and the ride isn't too bad either.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 06:34 PM
  #6  
Ivan 5.0's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 21, 2010
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
Originally Posted by Ministang
rts. I wanted a little lower and stiffer since I autocross my Mustang, and the ride isn't too bad either.
Harsher than stock?
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2011 | 03:09 AM
  #7  
Ministang's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 11, 2006
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Ivan 5.0
Harsher than stock?
Yes, a little harsher than stock. Every car I've ever lowered with springs or coilovers (four so far) or put Konis on (three so far) has ridden a little harsher than stock, it isn't terrible though, I'm not young anymore and my wife and kids wouldn't ride in the Mustang with me if it was too bad. I'm sure my bigger sway bars, heim joint front endlinks, and Steeda panhard bar, have a little to do with some of the NVH increase as well.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2011 | 05:22 PM
  #8  
sam strano's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 28, 2008
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: Brookville, PA
Harsh and firm are different. The dampers are mostly responsible for harshness (there are some exceptions with certain springs). Of course you need to be aware that lowering a car, adding spring rate, and cutting travel won't do much to make the ride more cushy. But if you add a good set of shocks (with or without aftermarket springs), the harshness is generally greatly improved.... to the point that folks often say that a good matched setup including springs rides better than stock. It's not softer than stock, just less harsh than stock.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2011 | 01:48 AM
  #9  
2011 GT's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: July 23, 2010
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: SW-Florida
I was challanged exactly with the same decision, Steeda Sport or Ultralites. As the car is my daily driver, ride quality was still a big issue for me, but definitely wanted it lowered.

I decided to go with the Ultralites and LOVE them! Ride quality is almost equal to stock, but handling is much better. Definitely would go with the same set-up again!

Don't forget about an Adjustable Panhard Bar to reallign the car! Not a must, but I'm glad I went with it! Not a big expense either... just my two cents!
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2011 | 08:08 PM
  #10  
RodIcal55's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: February 12, 2011
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Sam what would u use on a 2k11 vert GT ? It is much harder to get this info it seems .I
Like the HR Sport drop spec of 1f. 1.6 rear .opinions or suggestions ? thanks
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2011 | 11:34 AM
  #11  
sam strano's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 28, 2008
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: Brookville, PA
You can use either... but verts are a little heavier in the rear so they sit a little lower. It's just easier to say "except convertibles". The ultralites being a little stiffer will sit more similar to Sport rears, but the fronts will drop a touch more. Sports sometimes lower the rear a little more than folks find ideal in the back. So if I had to recommend on for that particular application, I'd lean Ultralite.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carid
Vendor Showcase
8
May 3, 2026 05:42 AM
tj@steeda
Auto Shows and Events
0
Sep 30, 2015 07:02 PM
GeoWett
GT
3
Sep 30, 2015 06:40 AM
Evil_Capri
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
2
Sep 25, 2015 12:56 PM
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
Sep 24, 2015 08:15 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:19 PM.