Notices
5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.

Negative camber Ford Racing M-5300-P springs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10/25/10, 05:42 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Audioi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 23, 2007
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Negative camber Ford Racing M-5300-P springs

I installed the Ford Racing M-5300-P springs on my 2011 GT and now the car has a fair amount of negative camber. I noticed this with the stock springs but it seems more exaggerated now that I have dropped the car one inch. I see Eibach has camber adjustment bolts available to repair the problem but it seems risky installing a smaller than stock bolt to correct the problem. Has anyone else run into this problem?
Old 10/25/10, 05:55 PM
  #2  
Mach 1 Member
 
Ministang's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 11, 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What accounts for "too much" negative camber will vary from one person to another. Personally I run a little more than -2.5° camber on my Mustang (with the Eibach bolts and Steeda springs), but I only put a few thousand miles street miles on it annually, and it gets autocrossed a lot. You should get it checked out to see how much negative camber you have, instead of just eyeballing it. Up to -1.0° will be fine for most people, and even a little more shouldn't cause too much inside front tire wear unless you mostly drive on straight freeways, assuming you rotate your tires adequately. More negative camber in front helps the car handle better, but too much can cause uneven tire wear for some people.

Last edited by Ministang; 10/25/10 at 05:57 PM.
Old 10/25/10, 09:18 PM
  #3  
Banned
 
shadowstang03gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 8, 2005
Location: philly
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Audioi
I installed the Ford Racing M-5300-P springs on my 2011 GT and now the car has a fair amount of negative camber. I noticed this with the stock springs but it seems more exaggerated now that I have dropped the car one inch. I see Eibach has camber adjustment bolts available to repair the problem but it seems risky installing a smaller than stock bolt to correct the problem. Has anyone else run into this problem?
did u get it aligned?
Old 10/26/10, 07:16 AM
  #4  
Legacy TMS Member
 
Glenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 7, 2006
Location: In Boredom
Posts: 15,823
Received 783 Likes on 572 Posts
camber bolts are common practice. I have had them in mine for a long time no issues.
Old 10/27/10, 10:45 AM
  #5  
Mach 1 Member
 
sam strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 28, 2008
Location: Brookville, PA
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I sell a lot of the camber bolts, folks like them because they are cheap @ $27.50. But I don't feel that's the best way to really correct the issue. They will fix your camber, but the bolts are very small and they can't hold the torque that the stock bolts can. Ford makes their own camber bolts which are stock sized shanks and require slotting the strut. And they had a second version of those released because the first versions (which were WAY bigger than Eibach bolts) were slipping.

The best solution, though one that costs more, is a set of something like the Steeda HD mounts. Not only will they not slip, but camber is more easily adjusted with them--and the best part is they get rid of the problematic Ford Strut mounts.... The only hitch is at this time they don't work on 2011 struts, so unless you are going to change dampers to something else you can't use those (yet, they are working on versions for 2011 struts specifically).
Old 10/27/10, 11:51 AM
  #6  
Mach 1 Member
 
Modshack's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 15, 2010
Location: Greenville NC
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Camber with the P springs is -1.2 degrees. In the grand scheme of things this is not a lot of camber compared to specs for many (euro) performance cars. It's also still within spec of -.75 +/- .50. Correct toe settings and regular rotations will not result in excessive wear at this number (provided you're not strictly a straight line guy)..

Last edited by Modshack; 10/27/10 at 11:53 AM.
Old 10/27/10, 01:41 PM
  #7  
Mach 1 Member
 
sam strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 28, 2008
Location: Brookville, PA
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Watch you tire wear... I run way more than that, but I'm an autocrosser, and I need the camber for the best grip. Is -1.2 crazy? Not off the charts, but it will cause accelerated inside tread wear on a car that just runs up and down highways without much hard cornering to also wear down the rest of the tire. Also braking is a bit compromised, and the car is more prone to tramlining and following ruts with increased negative camber.
Old 10/27/10, 03:14 PM
  #8  
Mach 1 Member
 
Modshack's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 15, 2010
Location: Greenville NC
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sam strano
Watch you tire wear... I run way more than that, but I'm an autocrosser, and I need the camber for the best grip. Is -1.2 crazy? Not off the charts, but it will cause accelerated inside tread wear on a car that just runs up and down highways without much hard cornering to also wear down the rest of the tire. Also braking is a bit compromised, and the car is more prone to tramlining and following ruts with increased negative camber.
Perfectly even wear across the tread at 2500 miles, but I tend to push the car in the corners a bit, so this is working for me...
Old 10/27/10, 03:54 PM
  #9  
Mach 1 Member
 
sam strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 28, 2008
Location: Brookville, PA
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Then that's a good number... Just not for everyone. I run -2. And will have more when I change the class I run my 5.0 in.
Old 10/27/10, 04:11 PM
  #10  
Mach 1 Member
 
Modshack's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 15, 2010
Location: Greenville NC
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sam strano
Then that's a good number... Just not for everyone.
I agree....
When I had my '08 Corvette, an inordinate number of forum guys used to dial out every bit of camber front and rear so their tires wouldn't wear unevenly on their weekly trips to whatever car show they were in...I always found that pretty amusing, but really, everyone should set the car up to fit their individual needs..
Old 11/6/10, 12:58 AM
  #11  
Legacy TMS Member
 
laserred38's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,047
Received 166 Likes on 141 Posts
I daily drive (30 miles) with -1.5°. Haven't run into any tire wear problems yet, although I go through a set of tires every year due to the mileage. I just switched to 275s all around, and I did notice a lot more tranlining though. I think that has more to do with the tire, however, and not the width or camber.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ecostang
'10-14 V6 Modifications
1661
11/3/22 08:50 PM
SpeedyJoe
Suspension, Brakes, and Tire Tech
18
8/23/15 02:42 PM
MADSCOTSMAN
2010-2014 Mustang
0
7/22/15 04:57 PM



Quick Reply: Negative camber Ford Racing M-5300-P springs



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:26 PM.