Notices
5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.

JLT + AED Tune before and after

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10/24/13, 06:11 PM
  #21  
Roush Forum Stalker
 
Stage_3's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 9, 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 11,144
Received 1,722 Likes on 1,225 Posts
So, a 2013 Mustang GT puts down over 410 to the wheels stock? I thought they had 420 horse at the crank? There's only a loss of 10 horses through the drivetrain according to that dyno graph.
Shouldn't a stock Mustang GT have about 360-370 at the rear wheels stock? Something doesn't seem right to me. Maybe those two dyno runs are after being dyno tuned with the JLT and AED tune, with 414 HP and 390 TQ being the best numbers?
Old 10/24/13, 06:15 PM
  #22  
Cobra Member
 
steven46746's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 16, 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stage_3
So, a 2013 Mustang GT puts down over 410 to the wheels stock? I thought they had 420 horse at the crank? There's only a loss of 10 horses through the drivetrain according to that dyno graph. Shouldn't a stock Mustang GT have about 360-370 at the rear wheels stock? Something doesn't seem right to me. Maybe those two dyno runs are after being dyno tuned with the JLT and AED tune, with 414 HP and 390 TQ being the best numbers?
Yeah the numbers seem right post tune but no way pre-tune. Maybe those two runs were both post tune/intake runs back to back.
Old 10/24/13, 06:16 PM
  #23  
Roush Forum Stalker
 
Stage_3's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 9, 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 11,144
Received 1,722 Likes on 1,225 Posts
Originally Posted by steven46746
Yeah the numbers seem right post tune but no way pre-tune. Maybe those two runs were both post tune/intake runs back to back.
Yeah, that is why I was getting confused. Sounds more like it.
Old 10/24/13, 06:19 PM
  #24  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
MadMoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 20, 2008
Location: Highlands Ranch, CO
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by steven46746
Yeah the numbers seem right post tune but no way pre-tune. Maybe those two runs were both post tune/intake runs back to back.
No I brought the car in on the stock intake and tune and did a run and then installed the JLT myself on the dyno, flashed the tune and did the second run. Not saying the numbers are accurate at all, because they dont make sense but it was a before and after lol
Old 10/24/13, 06:22 PM
  #25  
Roush Forum Stalker
 
Stage_3's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 9, 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 11,144
Received 1,722 Likes on 1,225 Posts
Originally Posted by MadMoose
No I brought the car in on the stock intake and tune and did a run and then installed the JLT myself on the dyno, flashed the tune and did the second run. Not saying the numbers are accurate at all, because they dont make sense but it was a before and after lol
Ohhhhhhhhhhhh,.............you said "stock" Mustang GT.
A stock intake and tune is not stock.
Old 10/24/13, 06:31 PM
  #26  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
MadMoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 20, 2008
Location: Highlands Ranch, CO
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No it was on the stock tune sorry. 100% stock. Thats what I meant by "stock intake and tune"
Old 10/24/13, 06:38 PM
  #27  
Roush Forum Stalker
 
Stage_3's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 9, 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 11,144
Received 1,722 Likes on 1,225 Posts
Originally Posted by MadMoose
No it was on the stock tune sorry. 100% stock. Thats what I meant by "stock intake and tune"
And you put down 410 horses to the wheels stock pull?
Old 10/24/13, 06:49 PM
  #28  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
MadMoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 20, 2008
Location: Highlands Ranch, CO
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, like I said, I know thats not accurate for a stock car. Makes me have no faith in dyno numbers really. The gains showed up at the track though so I'm happy.
Old 10/24/13, 06:50 PM
  #29  
Roush Forum Stalker
 
Stage_3's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 9, 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 11,144
Received 1,722 Likes on 1,225 Posts
Originally Posted by MadMoose
Yeah, like I said, I know thats not accurate for a stock car. Makes me have no faith in dyno numbers really. The gains showed up at the track though so I'm happy.
That's all that matters man!
How do you like the JLT cai?
Old 10/24/13, 07:00 PM
  #30  
Bullitt Member
 
65sohc's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 28, 2004
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Notice the sizeable increase in torque starting around 2600.
Old 10/25/13, 04:16 AM
  #31  
I Have No Life
 
FromZto5's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 24, 2011
Posts: 10,141
Received 172 Likes on 145 Posts
Originally Posted by Stage_3
And you put down 410 horses to the wheels stock pull?
Yeah something ain't right there. Hmmm
Old 10/28/13, 09:44 PM
  #32  
Mach 1 Member
 
Krohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 11, 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
We all know dynos aren't 100% accurate. But the track can't be too misleading.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bryanh24
5.0L GT Modifications
14
10/14/15 08:43 AM
tj@steeda
Auto Shows and Events
0
9/30/15 07:02 PM
RoushRS3
2010-2014 Mustang
7
9/29/15 08:03 PM
exgto
2012-2013 BOSS 302
5
9/28/15 07:39 PM



Quick Reply: JLT + AED Tune before and after



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:10 AM.