5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

JLT + AED Tune before and after

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 24, 2013 | 06:11 PM
  #21  
Stage_3's Avatar
Roush Forum Stalker
 
Joined: March 9, 2013
Posts: 11,140
Likes: 1,749
From: Massachusetts
So, a 2013 Mustang GT puts down over 410 to the wheels stock? I thought they had 420 horse at the crank? There's only a loss of 10 horses through the drivetrain according to that dyno graph.
Shouldn't a stock Mustang GT have about 360-370 at the rear wheels stock? Something doesn't seem right to me. Maybe those two dyno runs are after being dyno tuned with the JLT and AED tune, with 414 HP and 390 TQ being the best numbers?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2013 | 06:15 PM
  #22  
steven46746's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: September 16, 2012
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
Originally Posted by Stage_3
So, a 2013 Mustang GT puts down over 410 to the wheels stock? I thought they had 420 horse at the crank? There's only a loss of 10 horses through the drivetrain according to that dyno graph. Shouldn't a stock Mustang GT have about 360-370 at the rear wheels stock? Something doesn't seem right to me. Maybe those two dyno runs are after being dyno tuned with the JLT and AED tune, with 414 HP and 390 TQ being the best numbers?
Yeah the numbers seem right post tune but no way pre-tune. Maybe those two runs were both post tune/intake runs back to back.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2013 | 06:16 PM
  #23  
Stage_3's Avatar
Roush Forum Stalker
 
Joined: March 9, 2013
Posts: 11,140
Likes: 1,749
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by steven46746
Yeah the numbers seem right post tune but no way pre-tune. Maybe those two runs were both post tune/intake runs back to back.
Yeah, that is why I was getting confused. Sounds more like it.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2013 | 06:19 PM
  #24  
MadMoose's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: June 20, 2008
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Highlands Ranch, CO
Originally Posted by steven46746
Yeah the numbers seem right post tune but no way pre-tune. Maybe those two runs were both post tune/intake runs back to back.
No I brought the car in on the stock intake and tune and did a run and then installed the JLT myself on the dyno, flashed the tune and did the second run. Not saying the numbers are accurate at all, because they dont make sense but it was a before and after lol
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2013 | 06:22 PM
  #25  
Stage_3's Avatar
Roush Forum Stalker
 
Joined: March 9, 2013
Posts: 11,140
Likes: 1,749
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by MadMoose
No I brought the car in on the stock intake and tune and did a run and then installed the JLT myself on the dyno, flashed the tune and did the second run. Not saying the numbers are accurate at all, because they dont make sense but it was a before and after lol
Ohhhhhhhhhhhh,.............you said "stock" Mustang GT.
A stock intake and tune is not stock.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2013 | 06:31 PM
  #26  
MadMoose's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: June 20, 2008
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Highlands Ranch, CO
No it was on the stock tune sorry. 100% stock. Thats what I meant by "stock intake and tune"
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2013 | 06:38 PM
  #27  
Stage_3's Avatar
Roush Forum Stalker
 
Joined: March 9, 2013
Posts: 11,140
Likes: 1,749
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by MadMoose
No it was on the stock tune sorry. 100% stock. Thats what I meant by "stock intake and tune"
And you put down 410 horses to the wheels stock pull?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2013 | 06:49 PM
  #28  
MadMoose's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: June 20, 2008
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Highlands Ranch, CO
Yeah, like I said, I know thats not accurate for a stock car. Makes me have no faith in dyno numbers really. The gains showed up at the track though so I'm happy.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2013 | 06:50 PM
  #29  
Stage_3's Avatar
Roush Forum Stalker
 
Joined: March 9, 2013
Posts: 11,140
Likes: 1,749
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by MadMoose
Yeah, like I said, I know thats not accurate for a stock car. Makes me have no faith in dyno numbers really. The gains showed up at the track though so I'm happy.
That's all that matters man!
How do you like the JLT cai?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2013 | 07:00 PM
  #30  
65sohc's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 28, 2004
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Notice the sizeable increase in torque starting around 2600.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2013 | 04:16 AM
  #31  
FromZto5's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: September 24, 2011
Posts: 10,141
Likes: 172
Originally Posted by Stage_3
And you put down 410 horses to the wheels stock pull?
Yeah something ain't right there. Hmmm
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2013 | 09:44 PM
  #32  
Krohn's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 11, 2012
Posts: 981
Likes: 4
From: Houston, TX
We all know dynos aren't 100% accurate. But the track can't be too misleading.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bryanh24
5.0L GT Modifications
14
Oct 14, 2015 08:43 AM
tj@steeda
Auto Shows and Events
0
Sep 30, 2015 07:02 PM
RoushRS3
2010-2014 Mustang
7
Sep 29, 2015 08:03 PM
exgto
2012-2013 BOSS 302
5
Sep 28, 2015 07:39 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:58 AM.