Ghost Cam Tunes...
Mach 1 Member
Joined: June 17, 2011
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
From: Youngstown, Ohio
They return to the "regular" non camming tune after a preset RPM. The AED one does it at 1,000 rpm, I am pretty sure Lund's is 1,400 rpm. If it reverts at 1,000 rpm then there is no way you would notice a low end loss, mayyyybe the 1,400 rpm one for a half a second but nothing like the bottom end you lose when going to actual cams. Thats probably why everyone says "no power loss", because it only lasts for a couple hundred rpm and you can't notice it.
Post *****
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
They return to the "regular" non camming tune after a preset RPM. The AED one does it at 1,000 rpm, I am pretty sure Lund's is 1,400 rpm. If it reverts at 1,000 rpm then there is no way you would notice a low end loss, mayyyybe the 1,400 rpm one for a half a second but nothing like the bottom end you lose when going to actual cams. Thats probably why everyone says "no power loss", because it only lasts for a couple hundred rpm and you can't notice it.
Mach 1 Member
Joined: June 17, 2011
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
From: Youngstown, Ohio
3rd Times A Charm
Joined: February 17, 2005
Posts: 2,459
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by blackgt87
You have experience with them?
I was lucky enough to get refunded my money when the tune sucked, although Shaun is still trying to sort the tune out for my business.
I'll spare everyone all the details, but I would never recommend his tune for a 3V or a 5.0.
I've been running Jon Lund's cammed tune for a while now on my manual 'Stang. ZERO drivability issues at all. From what I understand from talking to others, there's no issues with his cammed tune for Auto's either.
Some people have never owned a cammed car. They aren't familiar with the eccentricities of the whole experience. It doesn't make the tune bad, it makes the driver have to learn how to drive a car with a lot of cam lope.
Some people have never owned a cammed car. They aren't familiar with the eccentricities of the whole experience. It doesn't make the tune bad, it makes the driver have to learn how to drive a car with a lot of cam lope.
Banned
Joined: July 4, 2012
Posts: 2,982
Likes: 0
From: Washington, DC
Old car
New car
They dont sound that wildly different, aNd they even make about identical horsepower. One made it with a 6.0, this one, a liter less
New car
They dont sound that wildly different, aNd they even make about identical horsepower. One made it with a 6.0, this one, a liter less
Last edited by TheDivaDanielle; Aug 31, 2012 at 09:00 PM.
Banned
Joined: July 4, 2012
Posts: 2,982
Likes: 0
From: Washington, DC
Originally Posted by TheDivaDanielle
Old car
Video Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzUskAOD5c0
New car
Video Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3BFD7Dlf4k&sns=em
They dont sound that wildly different, aNd they even make about identical horsepower. One made it with a 6.0, this one, a liter less
Video Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzUskAOD5c0
New car
Video Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3BFD7Dlf4k&sns=em
They dont sound that wildly different, aNd they even make about identical horsepower. One made it with a 6.0, this one, a liter less
GTO = Comp Cams XR281 228/230 cam, 1 3/4" long tubes, 3" collectors, no cats, no crossover to 40 series flowmaster axle backs on a 6.0 LS2
Vs
Mustang = No resonators, GT500 axlebacks, BamaTuned on a 5.0 Coyote
Same power, similar lope, just keeps me thinking about how to put on cat less mids for the sound, while killing the cat less smell
GT Member
Joined: June 4, 2012
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Sounds good. I'm waiting on C&L to get theirs done. My exhaust is already pretty much where I want it other than the idle. I don't notice the smell without the cats for some reason, maybe the wind is always blowing the right direction....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FromZto5
2010-2014 Mustang
61
Sep 30, 2015 05:28 AM