Dyno numbers are here!!
#61
Originally Posted by blackgt87
I ran at different tracks on different days, so I don't have a clear cut time difference. But taking all things into consideration it was about .3 slower at the track. My car is manual, and as far as supporting mods I had a CAI, and an O/R x pipe, and I tried a steeda, Bama, and AED tune (all mail order). The steeda tune was by far the best of the 3.
As stated above. I also think this is why my car got slower, I think you need a good host of supporting mods (including most importantly a throttle body and longtubes, as well as a lot of gear) to go with the boss or it will slow you down. A CAI and x pipe just won't cut it, and thats about as far as a LOT of people go with power mods. Which is why I keep harping on this, the boss intake is not for everyone.
Thanks!
You are EXACTLY right!
I am right, and I have proof, I have done this on my own car and seen it with my own eyes. Also talked to a close friend who ran slower at the track with the boss intake, he had similar mods as me. As I said before without going full bolt ons the boss intake will slow you down, even with them its probably worth less than a tenth, and thats if you're willing to rev your car to 7600+.
#62
Not the case on other forums ur one of few that claim this. I will make my own concluision, thanks for ur input but their are to many others that have pulled improved times for me to believe the few that had bad experiences. I will have proof of my own soon. Good luck to u man
But remember that the entire combo is what is important (dyno tune not mail order, and other bolt ons to go along with the intake), and that without trying both intakes you still have no proof. But if you like the way your car runs then you really don't need it.
#63
Originally Posted by blackgt87
More than likely whats going to happen is you will run your car, be happy with the time, and say the boss intake is worth it. I highly doubt unless you run a really bad time you'll ever pull the intake off and try the stock one again. Which is fine, as long as you are happy with your car then don't mind me.
But remember that the entire combo is what is important (dyno tune not mail order, and other bolt ons to go along with the intake), and that without trying both intakes you still have no proof. But if you like the way your car runs then you really don't need it.
#64
The n/a record in 9.97 at 137 mph iirc correctly from JPC's red car. Stroked 5.0...I'll find a link
here it is
http://www.stangtv.com/news/marini-j...d-5-0l-coyote/
here it is
http://www.stangtv.com/news/marini-j...d-5-0l-coyote/
Last edited by 12C/OBoss; 11/16/11 at 09:30 AM.
#65
Originally Posted by 12C/OBoss
The n/a record in 9.97 at 137 mph iirc correctly from JPC's red car. Stroked 5.0...I'll find a link
here it is
http://www.stangtv.com/news/marini-j...d-5-0l-coyote/
here it is
http://www.stangtv.com/news/marini-j...d-5-0l-coyote/
#66
Originally Posted by Trailhawg
This car has internals overhauled and heads ported. It weights 3030/lbs with driver. TKO 600 tranny with liberty pro stock shifter. Id say this is more of a race car than my supercharged car.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PonyMuscletang13
2010-2014 Mustang
4
9/29/15 09:40 AM