Notices
5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.

Dyno numbers are here!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11/4/11, 02:12 PM
  #1  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
Bmeline916's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 25, 2011
Location: Raceland , la
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dyno numbers are here!!

This is with Boss mani, JLT cai, roush axlebacks and steeda 93 race tune. Note mustang dyno results not dynojet

Name:  image-1021245078.jpg
Views: 294
Size:  19.6 KB



Name:  image-1034301657.jpg
Views: 269
Size:  17.0 KB

If u can't see it's 428whp 357wtq!
Old 11/4/11, 02:21 PM
  #2  
I Have No Life
 
FromZto5's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 24, 2011
Posts: 10,141
Received 172 Likes on 145 Posts
nice numbers man. All that from just bolt on? Is the Steeda 93 tune just a tune that you buy from them and do yourself at home?
Old 11/4/11, 02:22 PM
  #3  
Mach 1 Member
 
BlackMamba03's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 1, 2011
Location: Iowa
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those numbers seem off to me.
Old 11/4/11, 02:24 PM
  #4  
I Have No Life
 
FromZto5's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 24, 2011
Posts: 10,141
Received 172 Likes on 145 Posts
off bad or off good
Old 11/4/11, 02:24 PM
  #5  
I Have No Life
 
FromZto5's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 24, 2011
Posts: 10,141
Received 172 Likes on 145 Posts
^ btw Mamba, my car should be here next week or the next.... we need to meet up in IA city
Old 11/4/11, 02:25 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
UndercoverCop's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 31, 2011
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 357 seems strange. Nice rwhp #s.
Old 11/4/11, 02:38 PM
  #7  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Hytek's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 9, 2011
Location: IL
Posts: 2,547
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Not bad at all!
Old 11/4/11, 03:09 PM
  #8  
Mach 1 Member
 
BlackMamba03's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 1, 2011
Location: Iowa
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Off bad. The torque number seems low for what he has done on his car. 357 is usually a number we see on bone stock cars.
Old 11/4/11, 03:10 PM
  #9  
Mach 1 Member
 
BlackMamba03's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 1, 2011
Location: Iowa
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FromZto5
^ btw Mamba, my car should be here next week or the next.... we need to meet up in IA city

For sure man.
Old 11/4/11, 03:39 PM
  #10  
GT Member
 
Musker's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 26, 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't the consensus that the boss mani brings TQ losses?
Old 11/4/11, 03:56 PM
  #11  
Banned
 
UndercoverCop's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 31, 2011
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just bolting on a boss intake and tuning just doesn't seem the way to go?????
Old 11/4/11, 05:21 PM
  #12  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
Bmeline916's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 25, 2011
Location: Raceland , la
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlackMamba03
Those numbers seem off to me.
That's on a mustang dyno so that's as good as it gets! Yes torque is little low but when I do the headers and x pipe torque should come back up. That install will be on the 26th. I'm going to do some datalogging and send that to steeda so they can upgrade my tune.
Old 11/4/11, 05:24 PM
  #13  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
Bmeline916's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 25, 2011
Location: Raceland , la
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by UndercoverCop
The 357 seems strange. Nice rwhp #s.
Every 5.0 with just the boss mani has dynoed low torque numbers. But the horse power makes up
Old 11/4/11, 05:38 PM
  #14  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
Bmeline916's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 25, 2011
Location: Raceland , la
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by UndercoverCop
Just bolting on a boss intake and tuning just doesn't seem the way to go?????
This is a good mod worth the money, and with full exhaust has proven killer gains complemented with a good tune. I have gained almost 60whp with boss, cai, and canned tune I would say that's pretty dam good! Still have headers and x pipe plus custom dyno tune. I'm expecting a total of 80 to 90whp gain with all mods and CDT! That impressive gains for just bolt ons I don't care what anyone says!
Old 11/4/11, 06:21 PM
  #15  
Bullitt Member
 
VTXFrank's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 26, 2011
Location: Santa Rosa Beach, FL
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That HP number is pretty high for a Mustang Dyno. Probably one of the highest I've seen. The rwtq is right on with what I've seen for Mustang Dyno's though.

You've got a factory special there. That engine is strong.
Old 11/4/11, 07:31 PM
  #16  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
Bmeline916's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 25, 2011
Location: Raceland , la
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by VTXFrank
That HP number is pretty high for a Mustang Dyno. Probably one of the highest I've seen. The rwtq is right on with what I've seen for Mustang Dyno's though.

You've got a factory special there. That engine is strong.
Thanks Frank!
Old 11/5/11, 10:18 PM
  #17  
V6 Member
 
QuadCammer5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 21, 2010
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very nice. Long tubes will definitely make a big difference!! Especially sound wise which is always a plus. Who would you have do the LT install?

I have 397 rwhp and 387 rwtq with just a 91race tune from bama and borla ab. I just recently added LT and o/r h-pipe, and a carbon fiber CAI. I will be happy if I land in the 420 rwhp range.
Old 11/6/11, 12:44 AM
  #18  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
Bmeline916's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 25, 2011
Location: Raceland , la
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by QuadCammer5.0
Very nice. Long tubes will definitely make a big difference!! Especially sound wise which is always a plus. Who would you have do the LT install?

I have 397 rwhp and 387 rwtq with just a 91race tune from bama and borla ab. I just recently added LT and o/r h-pipe, and a carbon fiber CAI. I will be happy if I land in the 420 rwhp range.
A buddy is going to do my install for400$.
Old 11/7/11, 06:17 AM
  #19  
Mach 1 Member
 
blackgt87's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 17, 2011
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bmeline916
Every 5.0 with just the boss mani has dynoed low torque numbers. But the horse power makes up
I still disagree, and I think (in most cases) power under the curve suffers too much with a Boss intake and the car is actually slower.


I think with a CAI, throttle body, longtubes, full catless 3" exhaust, 4.10s or better, some weight reduction, and maybe a light driveshaft and wheels a Boss intake would be a nice compliment. It also compliments any forced induction well.

I firmly believe on a CAI/tune (even O/R x pipe) car the boss intake hurts more than it helps.

I don't mean to bash the boss intake every chance I get, and I think I may have commented in your other thread (I usually open my mouth everytime someone starts talking about a boss intake) but I just want to point out that for the majority of people (CAI/tune, maybe x pipe) a boss intake isn't (IMO) worth the money. I just hope that anybody who installs a boss intake has a true back to back comparison of performance, not SOTP. Either dyno your car back to back, or run it at the track back to back, or race someone with a close car back to back and make sure you realize what its doing to your car.
Old 11/7/11, 08:06 AM
  #20  
I Have No Life
 
FromZto5's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 24, 2011
Posts: 10,141
Received 172 Likes on 145 Posts
Originally Posted by blackgt87
I still disagree, and I think (in most cases) power under the curve suffers too much with a Boss intake and the car is actually slower.


I think with a CAI, throttle body, longtubes, full catless 3" exhaust, 4.10s or better, some weight reduction, and maybe a light driveshaft and wheels a Boss intake would be a nice compliment. It also compliments any forced induction well.

I firmly believe on a CAI/tune (even O/R x pipe) car the boss intake hurts more than it helps.

I don't mean to bash the boss intake every chance I get, and I think I may have commented in your other thread (I usually open my mouth everytime someone starts talking about a boss intake) but I just want to point out that for the majority of people (CAI/tune, maybe x pipe) a boss intake isn't (IMO) worth the money. I just hope that anybody who installs a boss intake has a true back to back comparison of performance, not SOTP. Either dyno your car back to back, or run it at the track back to back, or race someone with a close car back to back and make sure you realize what its doing to your car.
IMO, I would rather have the torque.... so no Boss mani for me, unless I go full bolt ons, or maybe an SC.

Question for you though, your sig... you ran 11.74 quarter STOCK???


Quick Reply: Dyno numbers are here!!



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:41 AM.