5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.

Confusion is setting in on tunes...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6/22/10, 01:40 PM
  #1  
GT Member
Thread Starter
 
cobra97's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 29, 2010
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Confusion is setting in on tunes...

I have seen and spoken to several tuners and vendors and the variance in rwhp is interesting.
Some say 23-28 rwhp (vendors) and 32-52 torque others say (reputable tuners)11-15 rwhp and same amount in torque this is with out a cold air kit just a tune. What gives? We all read the same stuff but I just want to make sure I spend my money on something that works. Am I just being to critical? I understand different dynos etc but sheesh.

Last edited by cobra97; 6/22/10 at 01:47 PM.
Old 6/22/10, 02:27 PM
  #2  
GT Member
 
erickburke's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 11, 2007
Location: Smyrna, Ga
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My guess is different dynos, different octanes, different gear ratio's(3.31, 3.55, 3.73), different environments, and some being tested in different gears(4th or 5th)

Lots of variables!!!
Old 6/22/10, 02:44 PM
  #3  
GT Member
Thread Starter
 
cobra97's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 29, 2010
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by erickburke
My guess is different dynos, different octanes, different gear ratio's(3.31, 3.55, 3.73), different environments, and some being tested in different gears(4th or 5th)

Lots of variables!!!

I get that but dang to that degree in variance? Im new to this and for some reason it just seems some of the numbers are to good to be true? Anyway thats just my .02. Thanks for the response
Old 6/22/10, 03:24 PM
  #4  
Mach 1 Member
 
super6stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 5, 2010
Location: AutoClubSpeedway
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I always assume I'll get half of the advertised hp with any product, that way anything over half and i'm winning.

My goal is CAI, longtube headers, catback exhaust and tune = 400-420rwhp with auto GT/CS.
Old 6/22/10, 03:29 PM
  #5  
GT Member
Thread Starter
 
cobra97's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 29, 2010
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by super6stang
I always assume I'll get half of the advertised hp with any product, that way anything over half and i'm winning.

My goal is CAI, longtube headers, catback exhaust and tune = 400-420rwhp with auto GT/CS.

That makes sense to me and about the same thing I will be doing
Old 6/22/10, 05:18 PM
  #6  
GT Member
 
erickburke's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 11, 2007
Location: Smyrna, Ga
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's always a safe bet!

I love it when people take the advertised claims and add them up for their total horsepower.
Although I think I was guilty of that when I was 18y/o with my first stang.
Old 6/22/10, 05:51 PM
  #7  
Mach 1 Member
 
super6stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 5, 2010
Location: AutoClubSpeedway
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't get the point of slamming so-called "ricer" math, no one knows their true hp until it hits the dyno and even then there's still a million more variables that can throw the number in opposite directions. But, atleast with my v6, dyno baseline 185rwhp, blower 265rwhp, after adjusting air/fuel ratio final dyno 276rwhp and ofcourse my numbers we're still short of prochargers claim but its not crazy to add parts expecting a gain.
Old 6/22/10, 07:55 PM
  #8  
GT Member
 
erickburke's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 11, 2007
Location: Smyrna, Ga
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by super6stang
I don't get the point of slamming so-called "ricer" math, no one knows their true hp until it hits the dyno and even then there's still a million more variables that can throw the number in opposite directions. But, atleast with my v6, dyno baseline 185rwhp, blower 265rwhp, after adjusting air/fuel ratio final dyno 276rwhp and ofcourse my numbers we're still short of prochargers claim but its not crazy to add parts expecting a gain.
You're right. It's not crazy to add parts and expect a gain but it is crazy to add parts and add advertised claims to equal the total hp/trq.
Old 6/22/10, 07:56 PM
  #9  
Team Mustang Source
 
bpmurr's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 13, 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can take RWHP numbers with a grain of salt. Like others have said there are so many variables. The best thing to do is read up on different tuners. Some shops actually do their own tunes while others are more parts suppliers that outsource their tuning. When you find one you like monitor your gains on the same dyno if possible. That will give you the best idea of that they are doing. At the end of the day all that matters is how the car drives and and does at the track.

Last edited by bpmurr; 6/22/10 at 07:59 PM.
Old 6/25/10, 03:00 PM
  #10  
Mach 1 Member
 
Tucker's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 19, 2005
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just ask for proof. Ask for a dyno sheet and read it with a fine tooth comb.
That's not too much to ask. Then ask if you get no where near what they claim can you get your money back.
It's also good to hear it from a 3rd party. Someone who purchased it first. If they did tunes, they have customers right?
Also ask if those claims are on "race" tunes with race gas and what you are going to get on your fuel.

Gains should be repeatable by the customer. If you do want to test a tune you will need to have the stock tune in the car and drive to the dyno, make at least 2 runs, then add the tune and make 2 more. Be sure to keep coolant temps very close to be fiar.
The gain is the gain.

Jay
Old 6/25/10, 03:39 PM
  #11  
Mach 1 Member
 
Gene K's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 24, 2007
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Based on the gain seen going from 87 to 91 on the 2010 with factory tune and then an aftermarket tune on 93 vs the gain seen going from 87 to 91 on the factory tune on a 2011 I would expect to go from 416 bhp stock on 91 to 432 bhp tuned on 93.

I would expect about 14 rwhp,

You can easily swing power numbers 5% or more just by changing oil, water and intake manifold temps.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bryanh24
5.0L GT Modifications
14
10/14/15 08:43 AM
austin101385
'10-14 Shelby Mustangs
3
10/2/15 01:00 PM
Kalel08
GT
2
9/29/15 03:06 PM



Quick Reply: Confusion is setting in on tunes...



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:01 AM.