Notices
5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.

Boss 302 intake?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5/30/15, 01:35 PM
  #1  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
dohc97's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 24, 2011
Location: MD
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Boss 302 intake?

Anybody in here using it? What's the real world experience with it?
Old 5/30/15, 02:18 PM
  #2  
Cobra Member
 
Jazzman442's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 7, 2014
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 25 Posts
What are you looking to do or Gain from it?
Old 5/30/15, 07:28 PM
  #3  
Member
 
coreyplant's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 25, 2015
Location: Beaumont, CA
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I heard by some online research it's supposed to give you more power at the top end of the RPM's, i'm sure there are factual articles out there
Old 5/30/15, 11:02 PM
  #4  
Cobra Member
 
Jazzman442's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 7, 2014
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 25 Posts
Fordracing does a good job of explaining the differences.
Old 5/31/15, 05:41 AM
  #5  
Legacy TMS Member
 
tom281's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 8, 2005
Location: Medina county, OH
Posts: 12,397
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
I run a ported Boss intake and Steeda cai with a tune from AED. Compare to stock the Boss gives you a little bump way down low under 2000 rpm, a little less midrange around 4500 rpm, and a strong pull from 5500 to 7500 rpm. With 373 or steeper gears it's a lot of fun. Plus looks killer.
Old 5/31/15, 09:25 AM
  #6  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
dohc97's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 24, 2011
Location: MD
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by tom281
I run a ported Boss intake and Steeda cai with a tune from AED. Compare to stock the Boss gives you a little bump way down low under 2000 rpm, a little less midrange around 4500 rpm, and a strong pull from 5500 to 7500 rpm. With 373 or steeper gears it's a lot of fun. Plus looks killer.
I've read all user reviews from AM, CJ Pony, and LMR. It looks like this could be my next mod.

Does it give you a deeper intake sound? I grew up when cars use carbs, and one of my cars way back then had a twin Weber 45 setup. It sounded evil.
The following users liked this post:
BDF (4/15/22)
Old 5/31/15, 10:17 AM
  #7  
Legacy TMS Member
 
tom281's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 8, 2005
Location: Medina county, OH
Posts: 12,397
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
It sounds noticeably deeper and more free flowing. My wife even commented on the sound the first time she heard my combo and she thinks mods are pointless so for her to notice and comment about the sound was kinda funny.
The following users liked this post:
BDF (4/15/22)
Old 5/31/15, 10:25 AM
  #8  
Mach 1 Member
 
GrabberBlue5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 3, 2011
Location: East Haven, Connecticut
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
I run it with my auto. It doesn't make more power up top but just carries it higher than the stock intake. It requires the correct supporting mods to be effective and the willingness to shift in the 7600+rpm range. Which with the manuals is tough due to the stock crappy clutch and corresponding parts.

Last edited by GrabberBlue5.0; 5/31/15 at 10:29 AM.
Old 5/31/15, 11:26 AM
  #9  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
dohc97's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 24, 2011
Location: MD
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Tom and Grabber...

In some reviews I've read, some are saying that the purge valve is no longer needed. They said that the inlet(green cap) in the Boss intake can now be plugged and the purge tube can now be taken off from the car. What did you do with yours?

http://www.americanmuscle.com/boss-i...ld-2011gt.html
Old 5/31/15, 11:34 AM
  #10  
Mach 1 Member
 
GrabberBlue5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 3, 2011
Location: East Haven, Connecticut
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Correct it's not needed. All you need is 2' of 3/8 fuel line and a couple of clamps. Just run it underneith the intake.
Old 5/31/15, 12:42 PM
  #11  
Legacy TMS Member
 
tom281's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 8, 2005
Location: Medina county, OH
Posts: 12,397
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
I haven't dynoed my car but it does feel stronger above 5500 rpm and I shift at around 7400 with no problems on the man trans. My limiter is at 7600.

I kept my purge valve and installed it as described in the late model resto write up, check out their site not bama's.
Old 6/2/15, 06:43 AM
  #12  
Member
 
rs999's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 9, 2015
Location: Pungo, VA
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to ThatDudeInBlue it's more top end.
Old 6/2/15, 02:52 PM
  #13  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
tj@steeda's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 16, 2011
Posts: 2,040
Received 52 Likes on 47 Posts
Here are some real reviews our site that may aid in your quest to get real world answers with the Boss Intake:

WHOLE NEW CAR!
This intake manifold adds so much more potential to this coyote 5.0 v-8. The car has a entire new powercurve and just screams from 4000k -7000k RPMS...This mod along with the steeda cold air and tune are so complementing to each other. Easy install and worth every penny!
- See more at: http://www.steeda.com/mustang-boss-3....DSi8jqok.dpuf
BOSS INTAKE AND STEEDA TUNE PACKAGE
Installs in about one hour and looks great. You will lose a little low end torque especially if you are used to the Steeda CAI and tune already on the car. The payoff is the high rpm horsepower you pick up after 5,000rpm. Im now shifting at 7,300rpm and the intake is VERY noticeable. The tune is really good too. A worthy mod especially for the money.
- See more at: http://www.steeda.com/mustang-boss-3....DSi8jqok.dpuf
GREG ABARR
2011 5.0 Automatic
3.15
Magnaflow muffler delete's
9600 mile's
This is a follow up on the first review I wrote on the intake. When I wrote the first one I was running on the CAI tune because I couldn't load the 302 tune. I have solved that problem.
First let me say thank's to Gus for writing 4 or 5 tune's for this car untill we got it right. Being an automatic the tune is different then the standard . I really enjoyed working with him.
First the intake was the easiest I have ever done. I have been a mechanic for over 40 year's and have done intake's from the flathead to the hemi's.
The preformance improvement of this intake is hard to describe. I don't have a dyno so have to go by seat of the pant's in rating it. It will smoke the tire's for as long as you want to hold the pedel down. The mid band and low band performance is vastly improved and the top band will scare you.
I did not notice any torque loss which surprised me. I also didn't notice any gas mileage loss but havn't really drove it enough to tell yet.
I did my test run's on asphalt and it will kick the rear out quite a lot doing a WOT run's. On concrete it is undriveable as on the 3th to 4th upshift it get's compleatly sideway's and I believe if I keep my foot in it it would do a compleat 360. Not brave enough to try it myself. The car rev's to 7500 allmost instantly before it shift's,there is no lag to it anywhere in the power band that I noticed.
Every day driveability seem's to be as good as stock if not a little better.The intake and tune seemed to cure a lot of the little quirk's of the stock car as it come's from the factory. There used to be a 2 second lag when I floored it[ in stock trim ] before the car would downshift any where from 55 to 85 MPH. That is now gone.
Next I will have to word on some traction so I can go WOT on concrete.
- See more at: http://www.steeda.com/mustang-boss-3....DSi8jqok.dpuf
And more ...

Let me know if we can help you with any specific questions you may have ... you can reach me at tim@steeda.com.

Best Regards,

TJ
The following users liked this post:
BDF (4/15/22)
Old 7/3/15, 12:40 PM
  #14  
Cobra R Member
 
Mr. V's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 22, 2012
Location: Ontario, California
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Boss 302 intake?

I am looking into this also. I was looking at the late model restoration kit. Is impossible to use the gt intake tube if you want to keep your stock air box? Also, are there any emissions issues with this manifold in good old California?
Old 7/10/15, 08:02 AM
  #15  
GT Member
 
BadHabit2Break's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 30, 2012
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boss 302 intake?

I have had the Boss IM for a while now. The car pulls alot better, but I have other supporting mods as well.

I purchased the kit from LateModel and had a wire and OEM connect made for the purge valve to look OEM.

I had the Boss IM ported about a year ago.

On my set up, with a base tune and E85 I put down 420rwhp. This was my base tune for data logging the car. I have not been back to have it dynoed on the finished setup.
Old 7/13/15, 08:24 AM
  #16  
GT Member
 
MKMotorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 9, 2013
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Love mine, the car should just come with it. NO torque loss down low with decent porting. Same drivability, same off idle characteristics, great throttle response still brake torques easily, etc... I'm currently 3.15/stock converter and the car IS faster in the 1/4 with it. Supporting mods are Accufab 84.5 TB, JLT intake, cat/reso deletes.


Added bonuses: It sounds mean (deeper), the car actually picked up 1-2 mpg, LOL....


4.10's going in this week so I assume things are only going to get much more bettah!
Old 7/13/15, 08:52 AM
  #17  
GT Member
 
MKMotorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 9, 2013
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GrabberBlue5.0
Correct it's not needed. All you need is 2' of 3/8 fuel line and a couple of clamps. Just run it underneith the intake.
This. I did not use or buy the install kit. You do need to extend the purge valve wiring harness 40" to re-locate the purge valve- no big deal. You can definitely re-use stock airbox and tube if you wish.


mine finished up, have about 10k on it like this. No trouble what so ever

Last edited by MKMotorsport; 7/13/15 at 08:55 AM.
Old 7/19/15, 05:12 AM
  #18  
Mach 1 Member
 
GrabberBlue5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 3, 2011
Location: East Haven, Connecticut
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by MKMotorsport

4.10's going in this week so I assume things are only going to get much more bettah!
That will be way over gearing the car and result in no gains but a lighter wallet. Put the money towards a converter.
Old 12/11/15, 05:26 PM
  #19  
GT Member
 
MKMotorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 9, 2013
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GrabberBlue5.0
That will be way over gearing the car and result in no gains but a lighter wallet. Put the money towards a converter.
Not true. Car moves good, It's the quickest it's ever been (downtrack at the stripe as well as 60ft), stock converter. If it wasn't quicker I'd have swapped by now... I've logged 100 or so passes on the 4:10's so my personal testing has proved beyond a shadow of a doubt. Now with a converter or BIG power adder might that change? maybe? but for a "low powered" stockish car, gear is a pretty good way to go.

Lot's of internet "myths" floating around here that simply aren't true, re-parroted over and over again. At my altitude the car needs the gear (6k+ feet), everyone parrots the same junk about gearing as if one size fits all.... That's why I don't spend a whole lot of time here. The technical knowledge is not really up to par....

Last edited by MKMotorsport; 12/11/15 at 05:29 PM.
Old 12/13/15, 08:00 AM
  #20  
V6 Member
 
jcsix13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 4, 2014
Location: MA
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love mine. I have it wit stedda cold air and their tune. Great drive ability and way more top end.


Quick Reply: Boss 302 intake?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:20 PM.