Bone Stock '13 RWHP, RWTQ Numbers?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: January 29, 2013
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bone Stock '13 RWHP, RWTQ Numbers?
Hi all-
What should I expect to see for RW HP & TQ numbers for my '13 GT Coupe? 6 speed manual, 3.55 rear. Following that, what would you think I should see with mods like a Boss 302 intake, 90mm Throttle body, CAI, Long Tubes and a good tune?
Thanks!
Dave
What should I expect to see for RW HP & TQ numbers for my '13 GT Coupe? 6 speed manual, 3.55 rear. Following that, what would you think I should see with mods like a Boss 302 intake, 90mm Throttle body, CAI, Long Tubes and a good tune?
Thanks!
Dave
#4
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: January 29, 2013
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So the HP number before any mods was 371 on a Mustang Dyno, right on what lit stangz said. I've installed a Boss 302 intake, Airaid Race CAI, BBK 90mm TB, BBK Long Tubes, BBK Hi-flow Catted X-pipe, and Flowmaster American Thunder 3" exhaust. It now has a BAMA 93 Octane "Race" tune. No chance to get it on the dyno yet, it'll be a while before we get another "dyno day". Any predictions where the power will be?
#6
Now don't shoot me for this but your CAI and TB shouldn't net you much gains. However I can see you at the 410 hp range now maybe more or less. Do post results tho because I have similar mods and would like to know where I am 😬
#8
the long tubes will net gains. However the boss intake is 82.9 mm, how are you letting in more air ? You can increase the tb to 100 mm but the boss intake is still 82.9 so you aren't really letting in more air.
#9
Cobra Member
I'm no expert but this is how I see and understand it.
The boss intake allows the air to flow more freely and also allows the motor to rev higher. The faster the motor spins increases the vacuum. The Boss intake allows the air to be moved more efficiently.
If that intake did nothing for HP and performance I'm very sure the Ford Racing program would not of used it. It may not be a huge amount of HP gain but it does offer some. Plus you can always have the intake ported.
I think it all boils down to one item supporting another item. Such as CAI to TB to Intake to Exhaust.
The boss intake allows the air to flow more freely and also allows the motor to rev higher. The faster the motor spins increases the vacuum. The Boss intake allows the air to be moved more efficiently.
If that intake did nothing for HP and performance I'm very sure the Ford Racing program would not of used it. It may not be a huge amount of HP gain but it does offer some. Plus you can always have the intake ported.
I think it all boils down to one item supporting another item. Such as CAI to TB to Intake to Exhaust.
#10
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: August 3, 2011
Location: East Haven, Connecticut
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
I'm no expert but this is how I see and understand it.
The boss intake allows the air to flow more freely and also allows the motor to rev higher. The faster the motor spins increases the vacuum. The Boss intake allows the air to be moved more efficiently.
If that intake did nothing for HP and performance I'm very sure the Ford Racing program would not of used it. It may not be a huge amount of HP gain but it does offer some. Plus you can always have the intake ported.
I think it all boils down to one item supporting another item. Such as CAI to TB to Intake to Exhaust.
The boss intake allows the air to flow more freely and also allows the motor to rev higher. The faster the motor spins increases the vacuum. The Boss intake allows the air to be moved more efficiently.
If that intake did nothing for HP and performance I'm very sure the Ford Racing program would not of used it. It may not be a huge amount of HP gain but it does offer some. Plus you can always have the intake ported.
I think it all boils down to one item supporting another item. Such as CAI to TB to Intake to Exhaust.
#12
Shelby GT350 Member
Still, with the tune and headers, I think the OP will be happy. It's probably over 400rwhp by a pretty good margin and I bet it's freaking blast to drive.
#13
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: January 29, 2013
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So, here are the results: 448HP, 408TQ! This was on a Mustang dyno. And, the HP numbers were still climbing and the TQ really hadn't fallen drastically off- the TQ curve has a slow drift downward after the peak. The dyno op stopped the pull at the original 6800RPM redline, not knowing I had bumped up the limiter with a selection in the tune to 7400. It IS a "blast to drive"! And the sound is amazing- turns heads all the time!
Happy, you bet!!!
Happy, you bet!!!
#14
Mach 1 Member
So, here are the results: 448HP, 408TQ! This was on a Mustang dyno. And, the HP numbers were still climbing and the TQ really hadn't fallen drastically off- the TQ curve has a slow drift downward after the peak. The dyno op stopped the pull at the original 6800RPM redline, not knowing I had bumped up the limiter with a selection in the tune to 7400. It IS a "blast to drive"! And the sound is amazing- turns heads all the time!
Happy, you bet!!!
Happy, you bet!!!
#15
Cobra Member
that's good numbers.
To bad the Boss CAI and 90mm TB didn't play any part in achieving those numbers......
I'll bet the seat of the pants dyno feels like its even more>>
ENJOY it and stay out of trouble.
To bad the Boss CAI and 90mm TB didn't play any part in achieving those numbers......
I'll bet the seat of the pants dyno feels like its even more>>
ENJOY it and stay out of trouble.
#18
Bullitt Member
Dyno numbers are stupid. You can't compare one dyno to another. And how the car is tested has a lot to do with the results too. Don't get to hung up on a number, it's all a little make believe:
http://www.hotrod.com/how-to/engine/...-dyno-testing/
http://departmentofboost.com/tech_in...e_boosting.htm
http://www.hotrod.com/how-to/engine/...-dyno-testing/
http://departmentofboost.com/tech_in...e_boosting.htm
The following users liked this post:
Coyote5-0 (6/6/16)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post