5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Aluminum Driveshafts...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 29, 2011 | 10:16 AM
  #1  
J Tennu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 23, 2010
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: New York
Aluminum Driveshafts...

I'm looking into a 1-piece unit as a possible modification for my daily-driven, soon-to-be occasional track-day ride. I've searched a few past threads... Other than the benefit of weight reduction/less rotational mass, what are the positives(and negatives) in doing such an upgrade? Dynotech... Shaftmasters... Driveshaft Shop... etc.?

I'm considering to do this application at the same time I'll have the long-tube headers installed this upcoming Spring. Thanks.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2011 | 10:17 AM
  #2  
mycroft's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: February 19, 2011
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, OH
I know a couple of Ford engineers who swear by the dynotech shaft.

Really, there aren't any negatives other than cost.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2011 | 12:28 PM
  #3  
BlackMamba03's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: August 1, 2011
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Dynotech would be my choice. As said above, cost is a negative. Also, you'll have to adjust your pinion angle. I see you have an adjustable upper control arm so that's a positive.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2011 | 03:51 PM
  #4  
J Tennu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 23, 2010
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: New York
Thanks for the insight. I'll be giving Dynotech Engineering a call tomorrow.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2011 | 08:03 PM
  #5  
Trailhawg's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: January 24, 2011
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
I don't have one but I know DSS has a CV joint which is supposed to be superior to the slip yoke. You may want to check it out.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2011 | 08:14 PM
  #6  
MRGTX's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: May 18, 2010
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 15
From: CT
There is a reason that this car comes with a two piece shaft and I doubt that it's cheaper to produce. My guess is that it isolates vibration...or it's a safety thing...but I don't know for sure.

So...I would disagree that the only downside is cost. There must be something else.

That said, it's at the top of my eventual mod list. Weight reduction, especially rotating weight, is extremely important...as you know.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 07:21 AM
  #7  
BlackMamba03's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: August 1, 2011
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Cost isn't the only negative but it's one of the biggest.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 03:55 PM
  #8  
Glenn's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: August 7, 2006
Posts: 16,113
Likes: 789
From: In Boredom
it pays for itself! Thats a positive
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 04:06 PM
  #9  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by MRGTX
There is a reason that this car comes with a two piece shaft and I doubt that it's cheaper to produce. My guess is that it isolates vibration...or it's a safety thing...but I don't know for sure.

So...I would disagree that the only downside is cost. There must be something else.

That said, it's at the top of my eventual mod list. Weight reduction, especially rotating weight, is extremely important...as you know.
I posted this on another thread. Ford engineer discusses 2 pc drive shaft vs 1pc:


https://themustangsource.com/f813/lo...2/#post6188217
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 08:38 PM
  #10  
J Tennu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 23, 2010
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: New York
I actually came across that thread... interesting read... thanks to all. On that note, the research continues. I'm hoping I can keep NVH to an extremely bare minimum with this type of application. Safety is paramount.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2011 | 11:31 AM
  #11  
Trailhawg's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: January 24, 2011
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by J Tennu
I actually came across that thread... interesting read... thanks to all. On that note, the research continues. I'm hoping I can keep NVH to an extremely bare minimum with this type of application. Safety is paramount.

If you want safety too... go with carbon fiber it's better in every way inclulding NVH but cost $1200 plus...
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2011 | 10:02 AM
  #12  
J Tennu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 23, 2010
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: New York
Originally Posted by Trailhawg
If you want safety too... go with carbon fiber it's better in every way inclulding NVH but cost $1200 plus...
Okay, then. I've been taking a hard look at DSS. I took into consideration what you had mentioned about the CV joint... carbon fiber sounds very tempting, but price is up there! I'll be giving them a call today for some recommendations.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carid
Vendor Showcase
6
Mar 30, 2021 09:29 AM
Mr. V
5.0L GT Modifications
15
Dec 24, 2016 02:57 PM
dblhelx
GT
5
Oct 6, 2015 08:08 PM
austin101385
'10-14 Shelby Mustangs
3
Oct 2, 2015 01:00 PM
Evil_Capri
Ford Discussions
3
Sep 24, 2015 04:30 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:42 PM.