5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.

412 HP w/ 91 octane, what about 93?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3/11/10, 12:21 PM
  #1  
V6 Member
Thread Starter
 
N8dawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 15, 2010
Location: Indian Shores, FL
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
412 HP w/ 91 octane, what about 93?

Will 93 octane offer any additional benefits?
Old 3/11/10, 01:19 PM
  #2  
GTR Member
 
Ltngdrvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 18, 2010
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 4,990
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Maybe, you know on the 2010 4.6 you can get 10 extra ft.lbs.
Old 3/11/10, 02:37 PM
  #3  
 
krnpimpsta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 31, 2007
Location: Washington DC Metro Area
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ltngdrvr
Maybe, you know on the 2010 4.6 you can get 10 extra ft.lbs.
10 ft-lbs difference between 91 and 93?

I would guess it'd be more like 3 ft-lbs..
Old 3/11/10, 03:41 PM
  #4  
GTR Member
 
Ltngdrvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 18, 2010
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 4,990
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by krnpimpsta
10 ft-lbs difference between 91 and 93?

I would guess it'd be more like 3 ft-lbs..
Well, 2010 is a 87 octane car, and putting super unleaded in it is good for and extra 10 ft.lbs. between 1000 and 3500 because the knock sensors don't intervene and retard the timing.

I was only sighting that example, I don't know that there will be any difference in the 2011 5.0 by going to higher octane.
Old 3/11/10, 04:30 PM
  #5  
 
krnpimpsta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 31, 2007
Location: Washington DC Metro Area
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ltngdrvr
Well, 2010 is a 87 octane car, and putting super unleaded in it is good for and extra 10 ft.lbs. between 1000 and 3500 because the knock sensors don't intervene and retard the timing.

I was only sighting that example, I don't know that there will be any difference in the 2011 5.0 by going to higher octane.
Cool.. just pointing out that there's only a 2 octane point difference between 91 and 93. Original poster was asking about the difference between 91 (to get stock 412hp) - and 93 octane.
Old 3/11/10, 04:35 PM
  #6  
Post *****
 
cdynaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
This is from Ford's 11.6.07 Press Release for the 08 Bullitt where Adaptave Spark Ignition was first used:

Engine performance is further enhanced through the use of an innovative adaptive spark ignition system, new for the 2008 [Bullitt] Mustang.
The system can sense, within a few seconds, what type of fuel is being injected into the motor and adjusts the spark to provide maximum torque at any given speed – and as much as
10 pounds-feet more between 1,000 and 4,000 rpm.
Bullitt can run on either premium or regular fuel. Ford recommends premium fuel for optimum performance, but the adaptive spark ignition will adjust the spark to burn regular fuel without damaging the engine.

This is from the 08 Bullitt Mustang Owners Manual:

Octane recommendations (Bullitt™* Mustang only)
Your vehicle will run normally on 87 octane regular fuel without damaging the engine, but premium fuel with an octane rating of 91 (R+M)/2 or higher is recommended for best overall performance. p. 258

So Ford says 'regular' is 87 and 'premium' is 91 because that is what is widely available across the entire US. It is only recently that 92 is available in my area and I believe that's only because of the 10% ethanol content. 93 is only available in select locations in the US.

The only way to eek out a little more performance if 93 is available is to adjust your timing. Otherwise your just wasting your money. And it would only be the slightest more low end torque beyond the 10 pound-feet.

Last edited by cdynaco; 3/11/10 at 08:38 PM.
Old 3/11/10, 08:20 PM
  #7  
Mach 1 Member
 
1trickpony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2, 2005
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know if its linear but going from 87 to 91 octane was 400/377 to 412/390. If you get half of the benefit, 418/396? The old software could adjust for 94 octane so I have to imagine the Copperhead software can do the same thing.
Old 3/11/10, 09:46 PM
  #8  
 
krnpimpsta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 31, 2007
Location: Washington DC Metro Area
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1trickpony
I don't know if its linear but going from 87 to 91 octane was 400/377 to 412/390. If you get half of the benefit, 418/396? The old software could adjust for 94 octane so I have to imagine the Copperhead software can do the same thing.
yeah.. 6hp/6torque.. seems a little high, but i think it's within the range of reason..
Old 3/12/10, 08:24 AM
  #9  
Cobra Member
 
todd03blown's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 30, 2009
Location: South
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
there has already been testing done and running 93 octane on the new 5.0. The result/rumors were 30hp increase..this was mentioned over on the BMW forums...I dont have the post handy either..sorry.
Old 3/12/10, 08:29 AM
  #10  
 
codeman94's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Goshen, IN
Posts: 7,930
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
Wait.... just for clarification... the 2011 GT requires 91 octane?
Old 3/12/10, 08:31 AM
  #11  
V6 Member
Thread Starter
 
N8dawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 15, 2010
Location: Indian Shores, FL
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by codeman94
Wait.... just for clarification... the 2011 GT requires 91 octane?
No, but you get 412 hp, 390 lb/ft with 91 and only 400 hp, 377 lb/ft with 87.
Old 3/12/10, 08:54 AM
  #12  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
RedCandy5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 9, 2008
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by todd03blown
there has already been testing done and running 93 octane on the new 5.0. The result/rumors were 30hp increase..this was mentioned over on the BMW forums...I dont have the post handy either..sorry.
Hard to believe that. +2 in octane will give you an extra 18 hp when a +4 octane only gives you 12?
Old 3/12/10, 09:13 AM
  #13  
GTR Member
 
Ltngdrvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 18, 2010
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 4,990
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by todd03blown
there has already been testing done and running 93 octane on the new 5.0. The result/rumors were 30hp increase..this was mentioned over on the BMW forums...I dont have the post handy either..sorry.
Sounds like wishfull thinking to me.

If that were actually the case you know Ford would be talking about it.
Old 3/12/10, 01:19 PM
  #14  
 
06GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 29, 2005
Posts: 4,618
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
413 horsepower
Old 3/12/10, 02:00 PM
  #15  
Mach 1 Member
 
xlover's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 10, 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 06GT
413 horsepower
i thought it was 413.6.....
Old 3/12/10, 03:56 PM
  #16  
eci
Banned
 
eci's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by todd03blown
there has already been testing done and running 93 octane on the new 5.0. The result/rumors were 30hp increase..this was mentioned over on the BMW forums...I dont have the post handy either..sorry.
30hp JUST from moving from 91 to 93 = BS.
Old 3/12/10, 04:41 PM
  #17  
Post *****
 
cdynaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by eci
30hp JUST from moving from 91 to 93 = BS.
Old 3/12/10, 08:17 PM
  #18  
Cobra Member
 
todd03blown's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 30, 2009
Location: South
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Believe what you all will, this guy actually has some inside info on the motor. He has posted this on a couple of different forums as he has a high performance shop up north. Guess we will wait and see what happens, huh?

Let me be clear..this is 93octane with tune.

Last edited by todd03blown; 3/12/10 at 08:27 PM.
Old 3/12/10, 08:26 PM
  #19  
eci
Banned
 
eci's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by todd03blown

Let me be clear..this is 93octane with tune.
Then that changes the dynamic now, doesn't it?

To compare, you'd need a 91 tuned beyond factory.
Old 3/12/10, 08:27 PM
  #20  
Legacy TMS Member
 
orange3.9stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 20, 2004
Location: N.E. Wisconsin
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Well a "Tune" and 93 octane, it's probably possible to get 30 HP out of that.

But who already has their hands on a new 5.0L ??


Quick Reply: 412 HP w/ 91 octane, what about 93?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:52 AM.