4.6L GT Modifications Place to discuss the 4.6L 2010 motor based modifcations.

Say Hello to My lil' friend!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 20, 2010 | 10:26 PM
  #21  
MadMoose's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: June 20, 2008
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Highlands Ranch, CO
well I know I'd take a blown 4.6 over a new 5.0 ! congrats I'm hoping I can get my car supercharged soon too!
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 02:43 PM
  #22  
xkornkidx01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 17, 2010
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MadMoose
well I know I'd take a blown 4.6 over a new 5.0 ! congrats I'm hoping I can get my car supercharged soon too!

Thanks! In all do honesty, My '05 was supercharged and now my '10 is, I think any stang I get my hands on will have a blower on it no matter what... hahaha
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 03:14 PM
  #23  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Is the KB a loud whiner or medium?
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 04:01 PM
  #24  
MARZ's Avatar
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
 
Joined: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by cdynaco
So the 5.0 non-forged bottom end can withstand 600 whereas the 4.6 'safe limit' is allegedly 500?
I suppose, although the Ford Racing / Whipple high-output intercooled supercharger kit for the 4.6L 3V is rated at 550 horsepower using the supplied Ford Racing tune. Only time will tell, really, as to what the new 5.0L will be able to withstand. Whipple has a leg up on the competition, IMO, in that Ford's engineers are the ones creating the tune(s).
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 05:37 PM
  #25  
xkornkidx01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 17, 2010
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by cdynaco
Is the KB a loud whiner or medium?
Medium to hardly noticeable... THANK GOD!!!
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 05:37 PM
  #26  
xkornkidx01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 17, 2010
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MARZ
I suppose, although the Ford Racing / Whipple high-output intercooled supercharger kit for the 4.6L 3V is rated at 550 horsepower using the supplied Ford Racing tune. Only time will tell, really, as to what the new 5.0L will be able to withstand. Whipple has a leg up on the competition, IMO, in that Ford's engineers are the ones creating the tune(s).

Is that 550 to the wheels or total output?
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 08:16 PM
  #27  
MARZ's Avatar
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
 
Joined: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by xkornkidx01
Is that 550 to the wheels or total output?
That's 550 crank horsepower.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 10:55 PM
  #28  
xkornkidx01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 17, 2010
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MARZ
That's 550 crank horsepower.
Sweet!!!!
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 10:30 AM
  #29  
xkornkidx01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 17, 2010
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MadMoose
well I know I'd take a blown 4.6 over a new 5.0 ! congrats I'm hoping I can get my car supercharged soon too!
Well I would go with Kenne Bell when you make the choice!
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 10:33 AM
  #30  
laserred38's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,053
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
KB superchargers are usually louder than Whipples. I'd bet because of the sound deadening on the 2010+ you just don't hear it inside the car; I hope it's louder outside!
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 01:17 PM
  #31  
Black GT500's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2008
Posts: 721
Likes: 4
From: Pacific NW USA
Without changing the 11.0:1 compression ratio, I really do not see the same enormous power increases being available to the new 5.0 as we see with a simple supercharger and tune on the 9.6:1 compression ratio 3-valve SOHC 4.6's...

As Kenne Bell's data already shows, the 3-valve SOHC heads give up nothing compared to the v4-valve DOHC 03-04 Cobra or 07-09 GT500 heads in a forced induction application...





Originally Posted by xkornkidx01
At the moment no... haha but kenne bell started working on the 5.0 right after mine was done, and if the numbers are as equally impressive as what they were on mine... i'd be scared then
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 01:56 PM
  #32  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by Black GT500

As Kenne Bell's data already shows, the 3-valve SOHC heads give up nothing compared to the v4-valve DOHC 03-04 Cobra or 07-09 GT500 heads in a forced induction application...

Thanx!
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 02:29 PM
  #33  
xkornkidx01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 17, 2010
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by laserred38
KB superchargers are usually louder than Whipples. I'd bet because of the sound deadening on the 2010+ you just don't hear it inside the car; I hope it's louder outside!

Yeah im sure thats the cause, also KB didnt bother incorporating that inlet tube that supposed to bring more noise into the cabin.
__________________
2010 Mustang GT ,3.73 gears. J&M upper and lower control arms, panhard bar, Steeda Sport springs,
2.6L Intercooled Kenne Bell Supercharger 482Rwhp and 408.13 Max torque, Steeda axle backs, ford racing xpipe

Car was modded at GTR high performance and Kenne Bell in Rancho California.

Last edited by xkornkidx01; Jun 24, 2010 at 02:31 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 02:31 PM
  #34  
xkornkidx01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 17, 2010
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by laserred38
KB superchargers are usually louder than Whipples. I'd bet because of the sound deadening on the 2010+ you just don't hear it inside the car; I hope it's louder outside!
Yeah im sure thats the cause, also KB didnt bother incorporating that inlet tube that supposed to bring more noise into the cabin.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 10:10 AM
  #35  
Bert's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 25, 2010
Posts: 3,971
Likes: 1,663
From: Massachusetts
Awesome, this is something to dream about if I ever get bored with my stock 2010.

This was sort of touched on by cdynaco's question -- was there any work required to the bottom end for the boosted output; or was it basically bolt-on top-end only?
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 10:52 AM
  #36  
Double-EDad's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: June 17, 2010
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
From: Southeastern Virginia
Originally Posted by cdynaco
So the 5.0 non-forged bottom end can withstand 600 whereas the 4.6 'safe limit' is allegedly 500?
Everything I've read to date says the 5.0 has a forged crank. Unless I'm missing something?
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 07:55 PM
  #37  
Black GT500's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2008
Posts: 721
Likes: 4
From: Pacific NW USA
Got any links to that reading?

Originally Posted by Double-EDad
Everything I've read to date says the 5.0 has a forged crank. Unless I'm missing something?
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 10:01 PM
  #38  
MARZ's Avatar
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
 
Joined: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Black GT500
Got any links to that reading?
http://www.mustang50magazine.com/tec...ine/index.html

This is an excellent read regarding the new 5.0L engine.

From the article:

*Crankshaft: Forged steel, fully counterweighted, induction hardened

*Coyote Mustang cranks are beautiful, fully counterweighted forgings. Ford says full counterweighting was necessary almost the minute it upped the rpm and load from Three-Valve 4.6. Both main and rod journal dimensions are carryover from the 4.6; wider journals were not needed and would have increased drag. The dark-blue tint is from induction hardening
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2010 | 09:13 AM
  #39  
xkornkidx01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 17, 2010
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Bert
Awesome, this is something to dream about if I ever get bored with my stock 2010.

This was sort of touched on by cdynaco's question -- was there any work required to the bottom end for the boosted output; or was it basically bolt-on top-end only?
No work needed... which ws surprising, we were thinking the car would make around 430rwhp when it was all said and done, but i'll take the 482rwhp
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2010 | 09:14 AM
  #40  
xkornkidx01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 17, 2010
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by laserred38
KB superchargers are usually louder than Whipples. I'd bet because of the sound deadening on the 2010+ you just don't hear it inside the car; I hope it's louder outside!
You're right, I drove into a tunnel the other day and gunned it... the whine is present!
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:15 PM.