2010 GT-500 performance
although the theme of horsepower seems to be on the rise with each new introduction i very seriously doubt we will see the day where it gets much higher. it would not be economicaly wise for an automaker to mass produce a vehicle that will put down much more power than it already does.
And again, an aluminum block would not only shave weight, but shave it where it's needed: the front end, thereby leading to better weight distribution and a better balanced car.
A 6 to 10% horsepower bump combined with all of the above would, in total, net a pretty impressive performance gain...and a great car!
Last edited by Hollywood_North GT; Oct 1, 2008 at 03:34 AM.
The current 3V aluminum block can handle a ton of power. It just needs forged internals, which the 5.4L in the Shelby already has. I am assuming that the new 5.0L aluminum block will be stout too.
The Shelby, however, would use the 5.4L engine it uses today, but in GT supercar configuration (aluminum block), which, to my understanding, was significantly costlier.
Ford always says everything is costlier. Is the Shelby going to a new engine in 2011 or continuing with the 5.4L?
I believe the working consensus is that it will continue on with the 5.4L - further tweaked, no doubt. And from a couple of rumors I've heard, it might trade the iron block for aluminum (which would be a huge dynamic advantage). But that last part is only speculation at this point.
Last edited by Hollywood_North GT; Oct 1, 2008 at 06:51 PM.
I believe the working consensus is that it will continue on with the 5.4L - further tweaked, no doubt. And from a couple of rumors I've heard, it might trade the iron block for aluminum (which would be a huge dynamic advantage). But that last part is only speculation at this point.
4cam330 on SVTperformance..who I trust explicitly on his info states the 2011 GT500 will get the al. block. I don't know and it wasn't stated that it was the block out of the Ford GT, I don't think it will be as the Ford GT block needs quite a few hours in getting a wetsump oiling system to work. I think Ford will just cast a new block to save money..
I personally believe a 5.0L 4V superscharged engine that can rev to 7k rpm is a great ticket. I was bummed that the current GT500 only revs to 6250rpm..come on it's a 4v motor.
Dave
I personally believe a 5.0L 4V superscharged engine that can rev to 7k rpm is a great ticket. I was bummed that the current GT500 only revs to 6250rpm..come on it's a 4v motor.
Dave
i would not bet on a built 5.0, just like in the past with the mass produced v8's we have all seen a lower popping point. i do not feel it would be cost effective to put out a motor for the gt with the same treatment as the gt500.
Don't doubt it, but not for a while.
Maybe when the DI 5.0 comes out...but until then, I'd probably look toward the 5.4 (seeing as its not tapped out yet)
And they probably won't be the same.
The 5.0 sounds like it'll be many different variations, which is cool.
You probably wouldn't be able to just move parts from one to the other.
Maybe when the DI 5.0 comes out...but until then, I'd probably look toward the 5.4 (seeing as its not tapped out yet)
And they probably won't be the same.
The 5.0 sounds like it'll be many different variations, which is cool.
You probably wouldn't be able to just move parts from one to the other.
Last edited by Boomer; Oct 2, 2008 at 04:58 PM.
It's starting to look like an IRS in the back. I can't wait to see what the ruling on this is.
What do you all think?
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/galler...?i=17415&c=286
What do you all think?
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/galler...?i=17415&c=286
I don't think that's an IRS mechanism.
If they do go IRS, it'll be a helluva thing - the Shelby will be capable of being a serious headache to cars like the new M3.
If they do go IRS, it'll be a helluva thing - the Shelby will be capable of being a serious headache to cars like the new M3.
Alluminum block....less insulation, lighter wheels, some alluminum body panels?
It's starting to look like an IRS in the back. I can't wait to see what the ruling on this is.
What do you all think?
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/galler...?i=17415&c=286
What do you all think?
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/galler...?i=17415&c=286
http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/show.../shelby/21.jpg
definitely looks like there might be different control arms on the 2010??
he might be onto something. compare to the pic of the 07Gt500 rear. should be the same right???
http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/show.../shelby/21.jpg
definitely looks like there might be different control arms on the 2010??
http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/show.../shelby/21.jpg
definitely looks like there might be different control arms on the 2010??
Last edited by grrr428; Nov 26, 2008 at 02:39 AM.



