Someone at Autoblog actually understands the Bullitt
Sorry I really don't see your point(s) ... ??? Could you please explain a little more in depth?
I did watch both videos ... (THANKS ~ !!!)
I did see that in one of them they said Shelby was an "engineer"; yet in the other video Shelby himself said he wasn't an engineer as that would be "limiting" or something along those lines ...
In addressing why/how the Mustang was picked ... GOOD POINT THAT STILL STICKS ... It seems to me like they can still take the current (and most recently enhanced) platform and offer a 5.4 engine, T56, and auto trans as pencil-in options ... AND DON'T TELL ME THAT CANT DO THAT ANYMORE BECAUSE THEY MOST DEFINITELY CAN ... (LOL)
I did watch both videos ... (THANKS ~ !!!)
I did see that in one of them they said Shelby was an "engineer"; yet in the other video Shelby himself said he wasn't an engineer as that would be "limiting" or something along those lines ...
In addressing why/how the Mustang was picked ... GOOD POINT THAT STILL STICKS ... It seems to me like they can still take the current (and most recently enhanced) platform and offer a 5.4 engine, T56, and auto trans as pencil-in options ... AND DON'T TELL ME THAT CANT DO THAT ANYMORE BECAUSE THEY MOST DEFINITELY CAN ... (LOL)

It's called the GT500, who would want an auto?
I'm not sure if the folks at Autoblog 'get' the Bullitt, but the car is right up my alley and I'm seriously considering one. I love that the car focuses on improving the items you will actually notice when driving it daily. For less than 3k more than a comparable Permium trim GT I can get the superb seats previously only found in the GT500 and the MS6, the GT500's superior steering wheel, a deeper set of gears, a sweet sounding exhaust, a few more ponies under the hood, a slightly lower and sportier suspension setup including a strut toqer brace(that last item is a rather big one for me since I would prefer something sportier than standard GT fare but the FRPP suspension appears to be a bit too extreme) and best of all...I can get it in dark green.
I personally think it'd be nice if the Bullitt's improvements became standard on all GTs. It seems to be more in the spirit of the GTs of the '60s.
On the flip side I could also see the suspension setup, strut tower brace, and minor brakes improvements constituting a 'Sport' package of sorts. And it would be nice if the seats made it into such a deal as well. But I'd be willing to bet the price of these as an option would be so close to Bullitt money the only real advantage would be a larger color palette for those who don't like green and/or black.
that is a very interesting comment, I could easily see Ford offering that as a "sport" option in the future.
Yes, I would pay the extra money.
Why am I not buying a 2008 BULLITT when I can afford one ... ???
Because Ford is not offering it the way I want (it's that simple) and I am the person that will be paying for it.
The original GT500(s) were available with automatics, as were the KR(s). The GT350(s) were available with automatics also.
Why offer this ... TO SELL MORE OF THEM, WHY ELSE ... ???
While I am thinking about it, I just posted to another thread on here and I made a point about SUV(s), trucks, etc. and I think you might like to see that point. I don't remember what specific thread it was in though.
That's because 30K is a lot of money for a lot of people (especially for a Mustang) and a lot of folks are wondering if there is really 30K worth of car there ... case in point ... look at the recent overpriced T-bird, for example.
I remember about a year ago, myself, George and several other members here at TMS discussed in painful detail what the Bullitt ought to be, vs what Ford was most likely to do. We saw it as a wonderful opportunity for the company to position a Mustang between the GT500 and the GT, though it was argued that that might not be the most practical use of a cash-strapped Ford's resources at this time...an argument that was perfectly valid. But despite that acknowledgement, we felt that there was no reason why Ford should not at least view the S197 as the ideal platform from which to build a more cosmetically authentic '67 GT390, a la the original movie, such that buyers would not have to mod the car after the fact.
Conceding that there would probably not be much of a power increase, about eight months ago it became clear that that was indeed to be the case - a modest HP boost with more top end latitude and some mostly off-the-shelf performance bits. But as time went on, it became equally clear that there wasn't a lot of effort on Ford's part to even get the core-requisite cosmetics right, either...and that the car would probably look like a V6, albeit perform like a slightly enhanced GT - all with some dark highland green paint and faux Bullitt wheels. A cost effective, but not especially inspiring, effort.
And while the car that Ford has wrought is certainly nice enough taken strictly on its own merits, it is not what many of us had long hoped for, though definitely what we had anticipated given Ford's financial situation and typical modus operandi.
The '08 Bullitt is therefore a nice car when viewed apart from the Bullitt film, with an intriguing set of modest performance enhancements, but nothing particularly "special," IMHO. By the time I finish my mods next Spring, I anticipate no problem spanking stock Bullitts...and therein lies part of the problem: the stock Bullitt ought to have been built to easily outrun a modestly modded Mustang GT.
So while it's a decent package in several respects, it's neither a cosmetic OR performance home run from the Blue Oval, particularly for those of us who wanted one, and waited a long time to learn what Ford was going to deliver, only to be gravely disappointed.
The T-bird was for the most part only overpriced with ADMs, which many dealers held out for while still having a car in inventory for over a year!
I remember about a year ago, myself, George and several other members here at TMS discussed in painful detail what the Bullitt ought to be, vs what Ford was most likely to do. We saw it as a wonderful opportunity for the company to position a Mustang between the GT500 and the GT, though it was argued that that might not be the most practical use of a cash-strapped Ford's resources at this time...an argument that was perfectly valid. But despite that acknowledgement, we felt that there was no reason why Ford should not at least view the S197 as the ideal platform from which to build a more cosmetically authentic '67 GT390, a la the original movie, such that buyers would not have to mod the car after the fact.
Conceding that there would probably not be much of a power increase, about eight months ago it became clear that that was indeed to be the case - a modest HP boost with more top end latitude and some mostly off-the-shelf performance bits. But as time went on, it became equally clear that there wasn't a lot of effort on Ford's part to even get the core-requisite cosmetics right, either...and that the car would probably look like a V6, albeit perform like a slightly enhanced GT - all with some dark highland green paint and faux Bullitt wheels. A cost effective, but not especially inspiring, effort.
And while the car that Ford has wrought is certainly nice enough taken strictly on its own merits, it is not what many of us had long hoped for, though definitely what we had anticipated given Ford's financial situation and typical modus operandi.
The '08 Bullitt is therefore a nice car when viewed apart from the Bullitt film, with an intriguing set of modest performance enhancements, but nothing particularly "special," IMHO. By the time I finish my mods next Spring, I anticipate no problem spanking stock Bullitts...and therein lies part of the problem: the stock Bullitt ought to have been built to easily outrun a modestly modded Mustang GT.
So while it's a decent package in several respects, it's neither a cosmetic OR performance home run from the Blue Oval, particularly for those of us who wanted one, and waited a long time to learn what Ford was going to deliver, only to be gravely disappointed.
As long ago as almost one year people posted information about a car that is substantially what has been presented. It wasn't rejected then with such vigour by a few of the ones who vehemently reject it now.
Memory is a wonderful thing but the written word trumps it every time.
Although with TRUCKS Ford has gone the other way and has too many options and variations IMHO
I'll see if I can find it. edit: found it and replied.





