2008-2009 BULLITT The Bullitt is Back!

Someone at Autoblog actually understands the Bullitt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 10:51 AM
  #1  
Vermillion06's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2006
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
From: NV
Someone at Autoblog actually understands the Bullitt

...While Ford definitely could have done more with the Bullitt, it makes sense that they didn't. They are going after the owner who doesn't want the frills. There is no spoiler. No quarter window louvers. There is no excess of badges letting everyone know that the car is special. The only available colors are Highland Green and Black – not exactly eye catching. Even the calipers, which were painted red on the 2001 version, have been painted grey to blend in with the wheels. Most people who see the car will give it only a slight glance, and that is what is intended. It was built to reflect the movie car, and only those who really know Mustangs will know what the car represents. Think of it this way – what would Steve McQueen drive? Definitely not something that would attract attention. After all, if there's a guy who doesn't need people to tell him he's cool, it's Steve McQueen.
http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/08/f...bullitt-day-2/
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 10:57 AM
  #2  
hatchttu's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 15, 2004
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
When the Bullitt was first released I was like most people and was a little disappointed. I would have lloved to have seen gobs of power, great distinction in the looks dept etc... but the more I think of the movie car and what is truly was, the more i like it. I still wish it had more power, but I now truly agree with the above article.
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 11:00 AM
  #3  
Torrence's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2005
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
To be honest, I am really starting to like the car more and more.
I think they got the car dead on, minus the HP. Other than that, the car looks great. It's got me starting to think about trading in my truck for this as a daily driver.......

I think Mcqueen would have been proud.
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 11:27 AM
  #4  
1 COBRA's Avatar
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 7,738
Likes: 361
From: U S A
"... It was built to reflect the movie car, and only those who really know Mustangs will know what the car represents..."

The author missed the fact of what a GT with a 390 represented back then otherwise a 289 would have been adequate and it would be more in line with the present 281 aka 4.6. then the issue would be mute.

"... Think of it this way – what would Steve McQueen drive?

A Vista Blue GT500 with the stripe delete and a few dings on each side of the car.

Anyone who really knows about Steve McQueen knows about his motorcycle and car collection which only included the unique and special. Steve McQueen strived for the best in anything he did or had.

Second place was not an option he considered or settle for. It was not in his character, whether as an actor or a person.
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 12:08 PM
  #5  
Cheese302's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: February 25, 2004
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 0
i think autoblog should have written "what would frank bullitt have driven?" his name was frank right?
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 12:14 PM
  #6  
RCSignals's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 27, 2007
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 1 BULLITT
"... It was built to reflect the movie car, and only those who really know Mustangs will know what the car represents..."

The author missed the fact of what a GT with a 390 represented back then otherwise a 289 would have been adequate and it would be more in line with the present 281 aka 4.6. then the issue would be mute.

"... Think of it this way – what would Steve McQueen drive?

A Vista Blue GT500 with the stripe delete and a few dings on each side of the car.

Anyone who really knows about Steve McQueen knows about his motorcycle and car collection which only included the unique and special. Steve McQueen strived for the best in anything he did or had.

Second place was not an option he considered or settle for. It was not in his character, whether as an actor or a person.
In that case McQueen drove the wrong car in the movie?
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 12:43 PM
  #7  
goesfast's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 17, 2007
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Remember that the new Bullitt would smoke the old one by a country mile in all areas. But of course it should, as forty years have passed. I believe the point in the article is that the car is "to the point" and doesn't draw attention. More of a business coupe of sorts, yes?
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 01:51 PM
  #8  
wally05's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 10, 2007
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 1 BULLITT
"... It was built to reflect the movie car, and only those who really know Mustangs will know what the car represents..."

The author missed the fact of what a GT with a 390 represented back then otherwise a 289 would have been adequate and it would be more in line with the present 281 aka 4.6. then the issue would be mute.

"... Think of it this way – what would Steve McQueen drive?

A Vista Blue GT500 with the stripe delete and a few dings on each side of the car.

Anyone who really knows about Steve McQueen knows about his motorcycle and car collection which only included the unique and special. Steve McQueen strived for the best in anything he did or had.

Second place was not an option he considered or settle for. It was not in his character, whether as an actor or a person.
The 289 was pretty much phased out in 68. The 302 was the replacement. Bullitt was a cop. Sticking his character with a GT 500 at the time would have been rediculous. It just wouldn't have fit.
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 02:10 PM
  #9  
Vermillion06's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2006
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
From: NV
Originally Posted by 1 BULLITT
"... It was built to reflect the movie car, and only those who really know Mustangs will know what the car represents..."

The author missed the fact of what a GT with a 390 represented back then otherwise a 289 would have been adequate and it would be more in line with the present 281 aka 4.6. then the issue would be mute.
I don't think they were trying the movie car's horsepower numbers but rather the image and low-key "coolness" of the movie car.
The 390 was middle motor in the lineup back then with the 428 as top dog; while we don't have as many engine choices today, that's what the 4.6 is today... Besides, today's standard GT does everything better than the 1968 car, performance wise.
Originally Posted by 1 BULLITT
"... Think of it this way – what would Steve McQueen drive?

A Vista Blue GT500 with the stripe delete and a few dings on each side of the car.

Anyone who really knows about Steve McQueen knows about his motorcycle and car collection which only included the unique and special. Steve McQueen strived for the best in anything he did or had.
These cars that were part of McQueen's collection are unique but besides the Jaguar, none of them could be considered the "best"
Originally Posted by 1 BULLITT
Second place was not an option he considered or settle for. It was not in his character, whether as an actor or a person.
Which is why he came in second place at Sebring in 1970 behind Andretti and said "we did great!"


On screen he played characters with low key coolness and quiet competence, not loud arrogance. The Mustang in movie had that kind of image as well. That's what Ford was trying to capture in the new car...
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 02:46 PM
  #10  
Knight's Avatar
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,610
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
Steve Mcqueen might have drove the GT500 but this car represents what Frank Bullitt would have chosen.
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 02:56 PM
  #11  
Phantom26's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 15, 2004
Posts: 303
Likes: 1
Where is the McQueen Commercial now?

About time for another one, maybe in the Hills of San Francisco?
Hmmmm, maybe a SuperBowl Commercial... HELLO FORD!!!
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 03:28 PM
  #12  
Perry H's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: October 14, 2004
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
It is widely said by those involved with the Bullitt movie shoot that the Hemi Charger would walk away from the Mustang. Is that the reason Ford didn't do much to tweak the engine?

All of the apologists that base their arguments on comparisions to the movie car crack me up. Someone complains about some aspect of the car and the comeback is ... well the original car was like that so Ford got it right.

So why doesn't it have:
leaf springs (and do the rear wheels hop if you do a reverse burnout)
pushrods
390 cubic inches
SLA front suspension
14/15 inch wheels with skinny polyglas tires
an imitation woodgrain dash
a semicircular horn ring inside the steering wheel
a fold down back seat
dents
an AM only radio

And where are all the purists decrying that it has:
OHCs
McStrut front suspension
rear coil springs and a panhard bar
airbags
18 inch wheels
a fake gas cap (that has the movie character's last name on it no less)
a steering wheel that also has the movie character's last name on it

If making a car be as similar as possible as the one in the movie was Ford's intention they seemed to have missed the mark
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 03:49 PM
  #13  
1 COBRA's Avatar
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 7,738
Likes: 361
From: U S A
Originally Posted by Vermillion06
...The 390 was middle motor in the lineup back then with the 428 as top dog; while we don't have as many engine choices today, that's what the 4.6 is today... Besides, today's standard GT does everything better than the 1968 car, performance wise...
It matters little that the 390 was the middle motor, what matters is he chose a GT which was Ford's top of the line factory Mustang. You might like to research and find out why he chose the Mustang GT.

By today's standards the Mustangs which is being chosen for movies are mostly GT500.
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 04:00 PM
  #14  
1 COBRA's Avatar
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 7,738
Likes: 361
From: U S A
Originally Posted by wally05
The 289 was pretty much phased out in 68. The 302 was the replacement. Bullitt was a cop. Sticking his character with a GT 500 at the time would have been rediculous. It just wouldn't have fit.
What's rediculous is your statement. It didn't fit then either for a cop to be driving anything other than a 4-door car with hotcaps.

The GT was debatched then and would be now. The only difference is that it would not be a GT.
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 04:20 PM
  #15  
RCSignals's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 27, 2007
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Perry H
It is widely said by those involved with the Bullitt movie shoot that the Hemi Charger would walk away from the Mustang. Is that the reason Ford didn't do much to tweak the engine?

All of the apologists that base their arguments on comparisions to the movie car crack me up. Someone complains about some aspect of the car and the comeback is ... well the original car was like that so Ford got it right.

So why doesn't it have:
leaf springs (and do the rear wheels hop if you do a reverse burnout)
pushrods
390 cubic inches
SLA front suspension
14/15 inch wheels with skinny polyglas tires
an imitation woodgrain dash
a semicircular horn ring inside the steering wheel
a fold down back seat
dents
an AM only radio

And where are all the purists decrying that it has:
OHCs
McStrut front suspension
rear coil springs and a panhard bar
airbags
18 inch wheels
a fake gas cap (that has the movie character's last name on it no less)
a steering wheel that also has the movie character's last name on it

If making a car be as similar as possible as the one in the movie was Ford's intention they seemed to have missed the mark
I haven't read a post from anyone that is that much of a 'purist'

the person you describe needs a '68 390 GT
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 04:32 PM
  #16  
Whammer's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: May 17, 2007
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 0
From: London, ON. Canada
Some folks are just jealous that they can't get an 08 Bullitt. With only 7700 available this is not a car you can wait till next year to get.
So because of their jealousy and anger they have to come on here and tear the car apart.
That won't affect my enjoyment one little bit- it's going to be one sweet ride!!!!
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 04:37 PM
  #17  
Vermillion06's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2006
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
From: NV
Originally Posted by 1 BULLITT
It matters little that the 390 was the middle motor, what matters is he chose a GT which was Ford's top of the line factory Mustang. You might like to research and find out why he chose the Mustang GT.
http://www.hottr6.com/triumph/BULLITT.html

As for the cars, Max Balchowsky tells us, "I suggested they get a 390 GT. I had suggested using a Mustang, and a Dodge Charger, or else there would be too may Fords in the picture. I thought we'd mix up the cars." The two 1968, four-speed Mustang GT fastbacks were purchased primarily because, promotionally, they were the best deal at the time. As far as Bud Elkins can recall, he feels the reason they used the Mustang was because "they wanted it to look like a cop car. This was his personal car and he wasn't a rich guy, he didn't have a real nice car. And it was Steve's idea to put the big dent in the fender, to show that it got banged up and he didn't have enough money or the time to fix it."
Originally Posted by 1 BULLITT
By today's standards the Mustangs which is being chosen for movies are mostly GT500.
It's probably because GT500s grab the viewers attention on screen with the LeMans stripes and scream "cool" (like in the upcoming "I Am Legend") unlike the "low key" cool of "Bullitt". Everything is bigger, louder and flashier these days in movies. Compare "Bullitt" to something like the lastest "Die Hard" movie.
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 05:00 PM
  #18  
1 COBRA's Avatar
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 7,738
Likes: 361
From: U S A
Originally Posted by Vermillion06
... The Mustang in movie had that kind of image as well. That's what Ford was trying to capture in the new car...
Seems like the determining factor for you to choose a car is the meaning of a fictional movie, with a fictional characters, in a controlled enviroment, where scenes and stunts are rehersed until the final product is edited.

Make belief never made more sense!

Got to hand it to Ford. Despite their short comings and their financial chuck hold they are masters at targeting their market.
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 05:15 PM
  #19  
RCSignals's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 27, 2007
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 1 BULLITT
Seems like the determining factor for you to choose a car is the meaning of a fictional movie, with a fictional characters, in a controlled enviroment, where scenes and stunts are rehersed until the final product is edited.

Make belief never made more sense!

Got to hand it to Ford. Despite their short comings and their financial chuck hold they are masters at targeting their market.
Obviously a Bullitt Mustang isn't for you, despite your board name.

That's OK, it's why there are almost infinite variations for the Mustang, has been since day one.
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 05:45 PM
  #20  
1 COBRA's Avatar
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 7,738
Likes: 361
From: U S A
Originally Posted by RCSignals
Obviously a Bullitt Mustang isn't for you, despite your board name...


Says who?
I love the BULLITT!





All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:30 PM.