2008-2009 BULLITT The Bullitt is Back!

New Bullitt on the Modular Depot Dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2007 | 10:31 AM
  #1  
KenB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 11, 2007
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
New Bullitt on the Modular Depot Dyno

Just wanted to let you guys know we had a new Bullitt on our dyno today. Unfortunately our rpm pickup broke so no torque reading. made 273 rwhp VERY rich. Will post pics tonight. Im at PRI so I wasnt there. Posting from my phone.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2007 | 10:33 AM
  #2  
wally05's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 10, 2007
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
So, what is that? Around 315-320 crank hp? I don't remember the percentage for drivetrain loss.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2007 | 10:34 AM
  #3  
Evil_Capri's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: February 3, 2004
Posts: 14,160
Likes: 73
SWEET!!

I need to get down to the shop and say, hello.

AJ and I drove down the Saturday after Thanksgiving, but we quickly found out your guys weren't open.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2007 | 10:36 AM
  #4  
futuresvt's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 1, 2005
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Florida
bummer

I'm pretty sure my stock 07 GT put down somewhere around 27_ rwp when it was dynoed to 550 miles on it...

I'm not positive, but i think that was the number...If so, that's not very impressive for even the modest gains advertised...
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2007 | 10:39 AM
  #5  
wally05's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 10, 2007
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
To be fair, dyno numbers should really be tested several times due to varying conditions. If a stock 300 crank hp gt was being put at 27_ something... I don't know... that sounds high given a 15-18% drivetrain loss.

I'm pretty sure a stock GT is around 250hp or so with 18% loss, but that could be COMPLETELY wrong, haha. I need to check.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2007 | 10:55 AM
  #6  
futuresvt's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 1, 2005
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Florida
It was dynoed at a dyno day event at a local mustang shop and I do remember that there were alot of guys with 05 and 06's who were impressed by the numbers. It was the first time I had ever seen anything dynoed, mine or not, so I had no idea.

The dyno operator said that he had been seeing that the 07s were putting down a good bit more to the rear wheels that the 05-06s. Not real sure why, as there was no advertised increase in power, but who knows...
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2007 | 11:04 AM
  #7  
2L8IWON's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: October 17, 2004
Posts: 798
Likes: 2
Not too bad, but my 05 dynoed at 274 Bone Stock and then 277 once we removed the honeycomb thing was removed.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2007 | 11:08 AM
  #8  
on d bit's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: May 1, 2007
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by KenB
Just wanted to let you guys know we had a new Bullitt on our dyno today. Unfortunately our rpm pickup broke so no torque reading. made 273 rwhp VERY rich. Will post pics tonight. Im at PRI so I wasnt there. Posting from my phone.
what dyno was this on? what fuel was in the gas tank?

what is the rpm pickup? does that read the rpms from the motor? if it could not read rpms from the motor how can it read power at certain rpms, and fuel ratio at certain rpms? could this lead to misleading a/f ratio? i have no clue as to any of this, just asking quesitons.

this was the dyno i saw earlier. i assume this dyno is on the 93oct.
http://www.musclemustangfastfords.co.../photo_07.html
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2007 | 03:20 PM
  #9  
RCSignals's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 27, 2007
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by KenB
Just wanted to let you guys know we had a new Bullitt on our dyno today. Unfortunately our rpm pickup broke so no torque reading. made 273 rwhp VERY rich. Will post pics tonight. Im at PRI so I wasnt there. Posting from my phone.
Which pre production car was this?
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2007 | 04:48 PM
  #10  
KenB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 11, 2007
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
not sure im supposed to say where it came from. the rpm pickup will not effect the HP reading. A/F was in the 10s. I wasnt there so not sure what fuel but i would guess 93. posting from my phone which is a pita. ill try and post more when i get back from the gentlemans club. i love PRI
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2007 | 05:11 PM
  #11  
Five Oh Brian's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: November 14, 2007
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 8
From: Pacific NW USA
A late model Mustang with manual trans loses about 12-15% through the driveline, so 274 rwhp is about 311-321 at the crank, so it's right on target. Run that Bullitt a little leaner and it'll be 320-330 at the crank easily!
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2007 | 05:53 PM
  #12  
wally05's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 10, 2007
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
I thought it was about that much for a manual car... I agree... it's about right on.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2007 | 10:16 PM
  #13  
Tony Alonso's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: February 8, 2004
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 7
From: Cincinnati, OH
Whoops! Wrong thread!!
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2007 | 10:25 PM
  #14  
on d bit's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: May 1, 2007
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Five Oh Brian
A late model Mustang with manual trans loses about 12-15% through the driveline, so 274 rwhp is about 311-321 at the crank, so it's right on target. Run that Bullitt a little leaner and it'll be 320-330 at the crank easily!

if its running 87. on 87oct it should make 315. with 93 it should dyno higher correct?
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2007 | 11:04 PM
  #15  
wally05's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 10, 2007
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Hp won't be much higher, the torque jumps up with 93, though
I think you're looking at close to 320hp with 93
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2007 | 11:48 AM
  #16  
goesfast's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 17, 2007
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
It was my understanding that '05's were putting down somewhere in the 250-255 RWHP, so these are pretty good numbers!
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2007 | 02:04 PM
  #17  
wally05's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 10, 2007
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Those are the numbers I was seeing with stock 05+ GTs, but that also matters on the type of dyno. 255 sounds much close to real stock rwhp numbers.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2007 | 06:15 PM
  #18  
StiRob's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: November 13, 2007
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Dyno numbers are very hard to compare. I would like to see numbers from a bone stock Gt on the same day and on the same dyno to get a fair comparison. The hp number quoted in this thread does sound about right however.

Rob
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Road_Runner
5.0L GT Modifications
67
Sep 2, 2024 04:46 PM
CiniZter
General Vehicle Discussion/News
25
Apr 28, 2016 05:41 PM
Gabe
Auto Shows and Events
3
Sep 7, 2015 03:30 PM
JTB
Motorsports
1
Sep 3, 2015 10:50 AM
mrp5150
SN95 Mustang
4
Aug 23, 2015 06:29 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:31 AM.