GT500 Handling Pak?
#1
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: January 1, 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GT500 Handling Pak?
I recall hearing that there was a handlign pak specific for the GT500.
Is it any different from the FR3 for the regular GT?
Also, can the FR3 handling pak for the GT be used on the GT500? Why not if no, what woudl be the problem?
Is it any different from the FR3 for the regular GT?
Also, can the FR3 handling pak for the GT be used on the GT500? Why not if no, what woudl be the problem?
#2
Team Mustang Source
I don't have any idea, but, logically, it should be different. The Front end of the GT500 is way heavier than the GT. Handling characteristics and dynamics would require different tuning.
#3
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: January 1, 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Agreed. But logic is not always the determining factor. Plus, the springs on the FR3 are so danm stiff that I would think the extra 100 lbs or so would be cake...
#5
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
Improving traction and control is always possible unfortunately at the expense of the suspension's balance and comfort provided by the stock tune. It's a matter of choosing which accomodates one's needs.
#6
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: January 1, 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#7
Team Mustang Source
I don't agree. I think the ride height (on mine anyway) is perfect. It has just the right amount of forward rake and overall balanced proportional look to the car. I guess I'm old school, but, I don't like the "slammed" look that is popular today. It makes them look like the trunk is full of concrete.
#8
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
Lowering will not make the fenders or the wheel wells any smaller unless bigger wheels and taller tires are added.
#9
Member
Join Date: March 31, 2008
Location: Collegeville, Pa
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is the upgrade I did so far:
BMR LCA's
BMR Adjustable UCA
BMR 1.5 Lowering Springs
BMR Adjustable Panhard Bar
BMR LCA Relocation Brackets
Caster/Camber Plates
Swarr Bar
I have no more wheel hop and the car handles better in corners. The launch from a dead stop is nice. All the bushings are polyurethane and because I only lowered the car 1.5", I did not need to mess with the bumpsteer. All the parts came to around $1000. This is just what I did but I'm sure there is many ways you can attack this.
BMR LCA's
BMR Adjustable UCA
BMR 1.5 Lowering Springs
BMR Adjustable Panhard Bar
BMR LCA Relocation Brackets
Caster/Camber Plates
Swarr Bar
I have no more wheel hop and the car handles better in corners. The launch from a dead stop is nice. All the bushings are polyurethane and because I only lowered the car 1.5", I did not need to mess with the bumpsteer. All the parts came to around $1000. This is just what I did but I'm sure there is many ways you can attack this.
#10
Team Mustang Source
This is the upgrade I did so far:
BMR LCA's
BMR Adjustable UCA
BMR 1.5 Lowering Springs
BMR Adjustable Panhard Bar
BMR LCA Relocation Brackets
Caster/Camber Plates
Swarr Bar
I have no more wheel hop and the car handles better in corners. The launch from a dead stop is nice. All the bushings are polyurethane and because I only lowered the car 1.5", I did not need to mess with the bumpsteer. All the parts came to around $1000. This is just what I did but I'm sure there is many ways you can attack this.
BMR LCA's
BMR Adjustable UCA
BMR 1.5 Lowering Springs
BMR Adjustable Panhard Bar
BMR LCA Relocation Brackets
Caster/Camber Plates
Swarr Bar
I have no more wheel hop and the car handles better in corners. The launch from a dead stop is nice. All the bushings are polyurethane and because I only lowered the car 1.5", I did not need to mess with the bumpsteer. All the parts came to around $1000. This is just what I did but I'm sure there is many ways you can attack this.
#11
Member
Join Date: March 31, 2008
Location: Collegeville, Pa
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can post some before and after pics after I get the car back on the 16th. I have a water leak that is coming from the passengers side kick panel area. The dealer said by the 16th. You know how that goes.
#12
Team Mustang Source
Sorry to hear about your issue. I had the radiator hose clamp leak from day 1. It was easily fixed. Hope yours is too. I've seen other threads about that issue in the other forums on this site. Good Luck.
#13
I'm surprised how many people in this thread AREN'T interested in the handling package.
Wow.
Wow.
#15
Well I don't own a GT500, but I do understand that it has even more weight over the front end due to the iron block and the supercharger. I don't even want to know how bad the GT500 understeers, because the stock GT (with even less weight on the front end) pushes pretty hard in corners.
The stock GT suspension (which I imagine the GT500 shares for the most part--the front spring rates are probably higher in the Shelby) is nothing to write home about, it body rolls quite a bit, and doesn't give a very responsive or "connected" feel to the road.
The FRPP handling kit for the GT did a number of things:
Plus it's a total package that's calibrated to work together--no guess work on matching multiple manufacturer's shock/strut calibrations to the spring rates and swaybar sizes.
There is an increase in harshness of ride, but I enjoy the firm feel of the car (I am 26 so some of our older Mustang owners might not share this feeling )
The stock GT suspension (which I imagine the GT500 shares for the most part--the front spring rates are probably higher in the Shelby) is nothing to write home about, it body rolls quite a bit, and doesn't give a very responsive or "connected" feel to the road.
The FRPP handling kit for the GT did a number of things:
- Lowered the car 1.5" all around and helped eliminate some of the 4x4 wheelgap.
- Greatly reduced body roll when cornering.
- Adds some negative camber to the front wheels to help maximization of tire contact patch during cornering.
- Added polyurethane bushings to all swaybar and linkage points--allows the driver to feel the connection to the road more, and promotes more consistent turn-in and cornering. This is due to elimination of the deflection of the stock rubber bushings.
Plus it's a total package that's calibrated to work together--no guess work on matching multiple manufacturer's shock/strut calibrations to the spring rates and swaybar sizes.
There is an increase in harshness of ride, but I enjoy the firm feel of the car (I am 26 so some of our older Mustang owners might not share this feeling )
Last edited by 06GT; 4/9/08 at 06:21 PM.
#16
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: January 30, 2008
Location: Pacific NW USA
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Wow, Perhaps you really should try driving a GT500. After you do spend some time behind the wheel of a new stock GT500, I wish you would come back here and talk to the rest of us GT500 owners about all of your required improvements. I’m sure you won’t be quit as baffled about the lack of interest in “improving” the GT500 suspension after you have tried it.
I can’t stand the “slammed” look. It looks the springs are broken or there is way too much weight in the car. Plus it really makes the car a real pain in the butt to drive on public roads. Maybe its popularity has something to do with our out of control obesity epidemic…
As far as a firm ride goes, my daily driver is a F-450 4x4, so nothing can be done to a Mustang that is going to give it a firmer ride. As for the GT500 having a “4x4 wheelgap” Mmmm… I suggest you don’t really know what a “4x4 wheelgap” is.
If a driver is not exceeding the capabilities of their suspension, they don’t need to modify it. Modifying something on your car because you need it to be better than it is is one thing. But simply modifying it for the sake of modifying or because you think making modifications is cool is kind of silly.
I can’t stand the “slammed” look. It looks the springs are broken or there is way too much weight in the car. Plus it really makes the car a real pain in the butt to drive on public roads. Maybe its popularity has something to do with our out of control obesity epidemic…
As far as a firm ride goes, my daily driver is a F-450 4x4, so nothing can be done to a Mustang that is going to give it a firmer ride. As for the GT500 having a “4x4 wheelgap” Mmmm… I suggest you don’t really know what a “4x4 wheelgap” is.
If a driver is not exceeding the capabilities of their suspension, they don’t need to modify it. Modifying something on your car because you need it to be better than it is is one thing. But simply modifying it for the sake of modifying or because you think making modifications is cool is kind of silly.
Well I don't own a GT500, but I do understand that it has even more weight over the front end due to the iron block and the supercharger. I don't even want to know how bad the GT500 understeers, because the stock GT (with even less weight on the front end) pushes pretty hard in corners.
The stock GT suspension (which I imagine the GT500 shares for the most part--the front spring rates are probably higher in the Shelby) is nothing to write home about, it body rolls quite a bit, and doesn't give a very responsive or "connected" feel to the road.
The FRPP handling kit for the GT did a number of things:
Plus it's a total package that's calibrated to work together--no guess work on matching multiple manufacturer's shock/strut calibrations to the spring rates and swaybar sizes.
There is an increase in harshness of ride, but I enjoy the firm feel of the car (I am 26 so some of our older Mustang owners might not share this feeling )
The stock GT suspension (which I imagine the GT500 shares for the most part--the front spring rates are probably higher in the Shelby) is nothing to write home about, it body rolls quite a bit, and doesn't give a very responsive or "connected" feel to the road.
The FRPP handling kit for the GT did a number of things:
- Lowered the car 1.5" all around and helped eliminate some of the 4x4 wheelgap.
- Greatly reduced body roll when cornering.
- Adds some negative camber to the front wheels to help maximization of tire contact patch during cornering.
- Added polyurethane bushings to all swaybar and linkage points--allows the driver to feel the connection to the road more, and promotes more consistent turn-in and cornering. This is due to elimination of the deflection of the stock rubber bushings.
Plus it's a total package that's calibrated to work together--no guess work on matching multiple manufacturer's shock/strut calibrations to the spring rates and swaybar sizes.
There is an increase in harshness of ride, but I enjoy the firm feel of the car (I am 26 so some of our older Mustang owners might not share this feeling )
#17
You can lower a car too much. You might get the 'look' you want but you may not get better ride and handling.
For the GT the Ford Racing FR-3 handling pack lowers the car 1.5" all around which, by Ford engineers own admission, is too much for the '05-up Mustang for optimal suspension geometry and operation. Recommended is no lower than a 1.0" drop in the front and a 1.25" in the rear if you don't want to compromise your ride characteristics.
It may be similar for the GT 500.
For the GT the Ford Racing FR-3 handling pack lowers the car 1.5" all around which, by Ford engineers own admission, is too much for the '05-up Mustang for optimal suspension geometry and operation. Recommended is no lower than a 1.0" drop in the front and a 1.25" in the rear if you don't want to compromise your ride characteristics.
It may be similar for the GT 500.
#18
Wow, Perhaps you really should try driving a GT500. After you do spend some time behind the wheel of a new stock GT500, I wish you would come back here and talk to the rest of us GT500 owners about all of your required improvements. I’m sure you won’t be quit as baffled about the lack of interest in “improving” the GT500 suspension after you have tried it.
I can’t stand the “slammed” look. It looks the springs are broken or there is way too much weight in the car. Plus it really makes the car a real pain in the butt to drive on public roads. Maybe its popularity has something to do with our out of control obesity epidemic…
As far as a firm ride goes, my daily driver is a F-450 4x4, so nothing can be done to a Mustang that is going to give it a firmer ride. As for the GT500 having a “4x4 wheelgap” Mmmm… I suggest you don’t really know what a “4x4 wheelgap” is.
If a driver is not exceeding the capabilities of their suspension, they don’t need to modify it. Modifying something on your car because you need it to be better than it is is one thing. But simply modifying it for the sake of modifying or because you think making modifications is cool is kind of silly.
I can’t stand the “slammed” look. It looks the springs are broken or there is way too much weight in the car. Plus it really makes the car a real pain in the butt to drive on public roads. Maybe its popularity has something to do with our out of control obesity epidemic…
As far as a firm ride goes, my daily driver is a F-450 4x4, so nothing can be done to a Mustang that is going to give it a firmer ride. As for the GT500 having a “4x4 wheelgap” Mmmm… I suggest you don’t really know what a “4x4 wheelgap” is.
If a driver is not exceeding the capabilities of their suspension, they don’t need to modify it. Modifying something on your car because you need it to be better than it is is one thing. But simply modifying it for the sake of modifying or because you think making modifications is cool is kind of silly.
#20
Team Mustang Source
I don't race mine, so, I don't need to carve that .01 sec off my track times. It handles my country roads just fine. The front does not feel heavy or understeer at the speeds I drive mine.
The car comes from the factory with the correct stance. The forward rake is perfect on mine. It looks very "Muscle Car" as is. I don't want the Fast and the Furious look.
The car comes from the factory with the correct stance. The forward rake is perfect on mine. It looks very "Muscle Car" as is. I don't want the Fast and the Furious look.