2008 Mustang GTR/GT500KR ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4/26/06, 01:58 PM
  #1  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
Legion681's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 24, 2005
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Allright, I checked to see if anyone had already reported this article, but it seems nobody so far did.
Here it is:
http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/04/26/for...r-2008-mustang/
and some more here:
http://www.stangsunleashed.com/index.php?c...rticleid=95&s=&

Don't know if it's BS or real, but it's interesting at least IMO.

Your thoughts please ?
Old 4/26/06, 01:58 PM
  #2  
The Mustang Source FOUNDER
 
TMSBrad's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Location: Vestavia Hills, Ala.
Posts: 9,887
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
My contact at SVT said he wasn't aware of this program, and he'd know.
Old 4/26/06, 02:41 PM
  #3  
GT Member
 
ecmazza's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 10, 2005
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While a KR would be cool, I am afraid to think how much it would cost.

I would prefer something cheaper to sit between the GT and GT500, not something even more $$.
Old 4/26/06, 02:45 PM
  #4  
V6 Member
 
CrossBoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 11, 2004
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(TheMustangSource @ April 26, 2006, 3:01 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
My contact at SVT said he wasn't aware of this program, and he'd know.
[/b][/quote]

OK, it would be interesting if they were working on an uprated car. It would be nice to have a GT500KR with the Ford GT's engine TURBOcharged, not supercharged. That would be downright crazy. Not to hijack a thread, but is SVT still "SVT" or this now called "Ford Performance?" Am I just behind the curve or what?
Old 4/26/06, 02:46 PM
  #5  
The Mustang Source FOUNDER
 
TMSBrad's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Location: Vestavia Hills, Ala.
Posts: 9,887
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
SVT is SVT, but they are now under the Ford Performance umbrella which includes Ford Racing and Ford Racing Performance Parts.
Old 4/29/06, 12:33 PM
  #6  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Knight Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 13, 2006
Location: McAllen, Texas
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe that this is not [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/bs.gif[/img] . SVT should make a GT500KR variant if they do not want to be left in the dust.
Old 4/29/06, 12:46 PM
  #7  
Legacy TMS Member
 
TomServo92's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 3,973
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Shelby GT500KR @ April 29, 2006, 1:36 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
I believe that this is not [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/bs.gif[/img] . SVT should make a GT500KR variant if they do not want to be left in the dust.
[/b][/quote]

I completely disagree. Instead of building a more powerful GT500 which will without a doubt carry an even higher price tag (not to mention dealer AMV), SVT needs to either up the power of the GT or develop a more powerful model (i.e. Mach1 or Boss) that slots between the GT and GT500 that's affordable to the mainstream Mustang buyer. The GT500 is powerful enough to take on most anything in its market segment.
Old 4/29/06, 01:36 PM
  #8  
Legacy TMS Member
 
Tony Alonso's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 8, 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 3,399
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
I doubt there would be an even more powerful version for a 1-yr run. The costs and time to certifying that engine for a relatively small number would definitely put the price up higher. The current car is extraordinarily desirable as is, given the MSRP+ prices being charged.
Old 4/29/06, 03:40 PM
  #9  
Cobra Member
 
mustangfan123's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 12, 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they should make a gt500kr with a carbon fiber frame,door panels,trunk,spoiler,interior,bumpers,and anything possible to make it as light as possible.And it should have 550-600 hp

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(ecmazza @ April 26, 2006, 3:44 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
While a KR would be cool, I am afraid to think how much it would cost.

I would prefer something cheaper to sit between the GT and GT500, not something even more $$.
[/b][/quote]
Do you mean like a gt350 with 425hp?
Old 4/29/06, 06:41 PM
  #10  
 
codeman94's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Goshen, IN
Posts: 7,920
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
GT350 with a terminator motor
Old 4/29/06, 07:27 PM
  #11  
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
 
1 COBRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Location: U S A
Posts: 7,733
Received 343 Likes on 216 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(CrossBoss @ April 26, 2006, 4:48 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
OK, it would be interesting if they were working on an uprated car.
[/b][/quote]
I doubt it, not with SVT gone.

That would be high end, pricey, and the bean counters are in charge. I don't think Ford will be spending money on a project that might not even be feasible so satisfy a small portion of potential high performance customers.
Old 4/29/06, 08:01 PM
  #12  
Legacy TMS Member
 
Tony Alonso's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 8, 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 3,399
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(1 BULLITT @ April 29, 2006, 7:30 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
I doubt it, not with SVT gone.

That would be high end, pricey, and the bean counters are in charge. I don't think Ford will be spending money on a project that might not even be feasible so satisfy a small portion of potential high performance customers.
[/b][/quote]

SVT is not gone, just re-organized!

I definitely agree it would be difficult to build a strong business case for producing a car higher in engine output than the GT500.

Regardless if we don't like the influence the finance people have, it is the reality of Ford's position in the market place. If people were not counting the pennies now, Ford would have a tougher time than it already is.
Old 4/30/06, 02:17 AM
  #13  
Mach 1 Member
 
nonsensez9's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 8, 2005
Location: Northern BC, Canada
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(TomServo92 @ April 29, 2006, 11:49 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
I completely disagree. Instead of building a more powerful GT500 which will without a doubt carry an even higher price tag (not to mention dealer AMV), SVT needs to either up the power of the GT or develop a more powerful model (i.e. Mach1 or Boss) that slots between the GT and GT500 that's affordable to the mainstream Mustang buyer. The GT500 is powerful enough to take on most anything in its market segment.
[/b][/quote]

I'd be remarkably happy with an n/a 5.4l 3valve with strong interenals.
Old 4/30/06, 06:46 AM
  #14  
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
 
1 COBRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Location: U S A
Posts: 7,733
Received 343 Likes on 216 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Tony Alonso @ April 29, 2006, 10:04 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
SVT is not gone, just re-organized!
[/b][/quote]
Aah!

So that's why we haven't seen the by Ford Racing and Ford Racing Performance Parts emblems plastered
all over the rear of the GT500! [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/nixon.gif[/img]


[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrinjester.gif[/img]
Old 4/30/06, 07:47 AM
  #15  
Bullitt Member
 
68notch's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 12, 2004
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(codeman94 @ April 29, 2006, 8:44 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
GT350 with a terminator motor
[/b][/quote]

I wish.
Old 4/30/06, 07:49 AM
  #16  
Legacy TMS Member
 
Tony Alonso's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 8, 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 3,399
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(1 BULLITT @ April 30, 2006, 6:49 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Aah!

So that's why we haven't seen the by Ford Racing and Ford Racing Performance Parts emblems plastered
all over the rear of the GT500! [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/nixon.gif[/img]
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrinjester.gif[/img]
[/b][/quote]

Very good! [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/04.gif[/img]
Old 5/1/06, 05:06 PM
  #17  
KBE
V6 Member
 
KBE's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 24, 2005
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(TheMustangSource @ April 26, 2006, 1:01 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
My contact at SVT said he wasn't aware of this program, and he'd know.
[/b][/quote]

Please be sure and let us know when he finds out about the new K or KR prototype. Maybe somebody should send him an email. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/04.gif[/img]
Old 5/1/06, 06:13 PM
  #18  
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
V10's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
In 2008 or 2009 the 6.2L Boss engine will be around.
Old 5/2/06, 07:02 PM
  #19  
TMS West Coast Correspondent
 
rrobello's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 14, 2004
Posts: 3,581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
all I know is if they built one it better be able to compete with the new Z06 not the camaros and if so Id buy one.
Old 5/4/06, 02:36 PM
  #20  
Cobra Member
 
Mberglo's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 9, 2004
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(TheMustangSource @ April 26, 2006, 3:01 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
My contact at SVT said he wasn't aware of this program, and he'd know.
[/b][/quote]

What's SVT? [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dunno.gif[/img]


Quick Reply: 2008 Mustang GTR/GT500KR ?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:40 AM.