2007 Ford Shelby GT500 Officially Rated at 500 Horsepower

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5/2/06, 03:56 PM
  #21  
 
rhumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(FRITZ @ May 2, 2006, 5:11 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
The only problem is, it's kind of a porker weight wise.
[/b][/quote]
Yeah, it's probably spotting the Vette and Viper nearly a 1/4-ton of deadweight, which will certainly blunt its acceleration, not to mention its comparatively blunt prow ripping a ragged hole in the atmosphere once the speed gets up a bit. However, the 500 hp number is itself very good and perhaps the breadth of a SC motor's power band may offer some compensation against its lighter, naturally aspirated brethren in the 500 club.

Of course, that's just on the straight and narrow (and short and smooth) -- throw some curves and cobbles into the equation and the lighter, lower, sleeker and more capably suspended V-cars will really have an distinct advantage.

But then again, the Stang's price savings will by a lot of beer to drown one's sorrows at the end of Slinky Snake Canyon Road.
Old 5/2/06, 04:07 PM
  #22  
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
 
1 COBRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Location: U S A
Posts: 7,737
Received 343 Likes on 216 Posts
The weight should be the least of concerns. The challange will be the handling and the poor suckers who'll think they have instantly become track ready once they are given the keys.
Old 5/2/06, 04:17 PM
  #23  
Bullitt Member
 
Legion681's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 24, 2005
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(1 BULLITT @ May 2, 2006, 6:10 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
The weight should be the least of concerns. The challange will be the handling and the poor suckers who'll think they have instantly become track ready once they are given the keys.
[/b][/quote]

You have read my mind.
I can see in the near future a lot of casualties due to the "I am invincible" syndrome...
This is a car that demands a LOT of respect...
Old 5/2/06, 04:23 PM
  #24  
Needs to be more Astony
 
Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 4, 2004
Location: Volo, IL
Posts: 8,609
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
i'm kinda disappointed at the 6250 redline. it seems like the the 4v cobra motor has been losing revs ever since 96. wasn't the redline 7200 back then.
Old 5/2/06, 04:44 PM
  #25  
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
 
1 COBRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Location: U S A
Posts: 7,737
Received 343 Likes on 216 Posts
I don't know for sure but 7200 seems is kind of high. The '04 Cobras had 6600 and I could swear it was improved from the '99s and '01s.
Old 5/2/06, 04:44 PM
  #26  
Cobra Member
 
mustangfan123's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 12, 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(ecmazza @ May 2, 2006, 10:31 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/eek.gif[/img]

....

[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/drool.gif[/img]

When one of you people are lucky enough to get one of these beasts, I call shot gun
[/b][/quote]
I call back seat [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrinjester.gif[/img]
Old 5/2/06, 05:11 PM
  #27  
Needs to be more Astony
 
Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 4, 2004
Location: Volo, IL
Posts: 8,609
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(1 BULLITT @ May 2, 2006, 5:47 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
I don't know for sure but 7200 seems is kind of high. The '04 Cobras had 6600 and I could swear it was improved from the '99s and '01s.
[/b][/quote]
sorry i'm not sure why i thought 7200...

"The Cobra engine is free-revving from idle to its 6,800 rpm redline (fuel shutoff occurs at 7,000 rpm). It produces 305 horsepower at 5,800 rpm, and 300 lb./ft. of torque at 4,800 rpm; it generates more than 1 horsepower per cubic inch of displacement, and 66.30 horsepower per liter."



Old 5/2/06, 05:42 PM
  #28  
GT Member
 
svt boost's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 12, 2004
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what we all need to remember...if this is anything like the Ford GT, with simple exhaust/pulley changes and a custom tune, this thing is going to put down I bet 600rwhp for less than a grand in aftermarket parts.
Old 5/2/06, 06:18 PM
  #29  
Legacy TMS Member
 
laserred38's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,047
Received 166 Likes on 141 Posts
what price advantage over the vette and viper???....good luck finding one for $40k and ditto for finding a vette at msrp....and i knew the 500 didnt have to do with HP but i figure these days Ford would like to have its halo car's (now that GT production has ended) name evoke its power rating...even so nice to see the 500 in the name now HAS a meaning other than being nostalgic
Old 5/2/06, 07:01 PM
  #30  
Bullitt Member
 
snkbtn99's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 6, 2004
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(1 BULLITT @ May 2, 2006, 4:47 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
I don't know for sure but 7200 seems is kind of high. The '04 Cobras had 6600 and I could swear it was improved from the '99s and '01s.
[/b][/quote]

Nope ...actually the 03/04 redline less than the 99/01. My '99 redlines at 7200.

And yes .... be ready to see some wrecked 500's. People that dont know how to drive a car with that much horsepower will immediately thing that they can nail the gas and all will be OK .... Uh ...no ..... Please learn to drive them first ....
Old 5/2/06, 07:29 PM
  #31  
FR500 Member
 
hi5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 15, 2005
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is going to need all 500 of those horses to move that weight. LOL. Ford "got it to make" 500hp, now it needs to lose 500lbs. to truly challenge the other cars in the 500hp club when the straightaways end...
Old 5/2/06, 07:31 PM
  #32  
Legacy TMS Member
 
Tony Alonso's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 8, 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 3,399
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
I used to take my '96 Cobra to an indicate 7200 on the tach without the engine cutting off, but technically the redline was 6800.
Old 5/2/06, 07:47 PM
  #33  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Knight Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 13, 2006
Location: McAllen, Texas
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't wait when the Vette, Challenge, and Camaro guys find out. They'll be so scared, they would rather just lose hope on a Mustang killer (Camaro and Challenger)

I guess Motor Trend was right. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrinjester.gif[/img]
Old 5/2/06, 07:58 PM
  #34  
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
 
1 COBRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Location: U S A
Posts: 7,737
Received 343 Likes on 216 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(hi5.0 @ May 2, 2006, 9:32 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
It is going to need all 500 of those horses to move that weight...
[/b][/quote]
That's a good point if it applies to competition in Z06 territory. If the reference is to enjoying the car without a 2/10 of a second concern, the car will be a blast to drive providing driver awareness and a safe enviroment are taken into account.
Old 5/2/06, 07:59 PM
  #35  
GT Member
 
Bluejoker's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 27, 2005
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So the new vette is around 44k right? Z06 around 65K?

So the million dollar question is;

'Is the new GT500 a performance bargain compared to a vette or the z06?'

Anyone? [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dunno.gif[/img]
Old 5/2/06, 09:42 PM
  #36  
 
rhumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(1 BULLITT @ May 2, 2006, 6:10 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
The weight should be the least of concerns. The challange will be the handling and the poor suckers who'll think they have instantly become track ready once they are given the keys.
[/b][/quote]
Well, it IS all that weight, up front and not too low, that will make the handling a challenge, at least on anything other than flat, butter smooth roads. Interestingly, much like the original GT500, this will be much more a straightline steamer than an adroit corner carver. A monster motor without its full equal in suspension and brakes will always by coffin bait for the ill prepared driver. But even the most idiotproofed car graced with the best suspension and binders money can by will wilt before the hand of the better idiot.

While I'll make my usual IRS pitch to give it a level of all quarters control to go with its impressive dead ahead go, I'm sure they're more than enough 1/4-milers to sell this car out. So from Ford's perspective, why bother to aspire any higher -- perhaps cynical, but financially sound in a tactical way.

But of course, the GT500, even if a bit over priced compared to its Cobra predecessors, will be $20K cheaper than a ZO-6 and $40K skinnier than a Viper's sticker, so compromises do have to be made.
Old 5/2/06, 10:01 PM
  #37  
Bullitt Member
 
300HPGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 25, 2005
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well Ford also Rates these engines with the transmissions attatched and all accessories on the front of the motor. Most other car companies rate with no accessories and at the flywheel. So the Z06 is 505 @ flywheel and with no frontend accessories. Why do you think our 300 HP out of the box stangs are putting out relatively decient numbers stock at the wheels. even the auto guys seem to do almost just as good.
Old 5/2/06, 10:50 PM
  #38  
Legacy TMS Member
 
TomServo92's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 3,971
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(300HPGT @ May 2, 2006, 11:04 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Well Ford also Rates these engines with the transmissions attatched and all accessories on the front of the motor. Most other car companies rate with no accessories and at the flywheel. So the Z06 is 505 @ flywheel and with no frontend accessories. Why do you think our 300 HP out of the box stangs are putting out relatively decient numbers stock at the wheels. even the auto guys seem to do almost just as good.
[/b][/quote]

Actually, the new testing procedures require all manufacturers to test their engines the same way. Several Asian manufacturers have had to lower their advertised HP after testing under the new testing protocols. The Z06 was tested under the protocols so it should be just as accurate as the GT500 rating.
Old 5/2/06, 11:00 PM
  #39  
V6 Member
 
James4litre's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 26, 2004
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
as soon as i get out of college, not a house, or a savings account will my money go to, but Mr. Shelby shall recieve my income imediately
Old 5/3/06, 04:12 AM
  #40  
Member
 
arc05's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 6, 2005
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(TomServo92 @ May 2, 2006, 10:53 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Actually, the new testing procedures require all manufacturers to test their engines the same way. Several Asian manufacturers have had to lower their advertised HP after testing under the new testing protocols. The Z06 was tested under the protocols so it should be just as accurate as the GT500 rating.
[/b][/quote]

Precisely... my girlfriend of 3 years won't be happy about that but hey, sacrifices right?!


Quick Reply: 2007 Ford Shelby GT500 Officially Rated at 500 Horsepower



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:01 AM.