WMS 2011 Mustang GT 5.0 dyno results!!!
5/17/10, 08:09 AM
#1
V6 Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: April 9, 2010
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WMS 2011 Mustang GT 5.0 dyno results!!!
After a 20 minute roadtest the WMS 2011 5.0 GT was strapped down to the dyno and made 3 back to back to back dyno pulls with 2 minutes in between each pull. 3:73 gears and dyno'd in 5th.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMUyrUyuQOU
Right in line with what everyone else that uses a dynojet is getting for numbers. I am very impressed with this engine combination and will be doing more to it over the next couple of weeks.
JJ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMUyrUyuQOU
Right in line with what everyone else that uses a dynojet is getting for numbers. I am very impressed with this engine combination and will be doing more to it over the next couple of weeks.
JJ
5/17/10, 08:34 AM
#4
I am Shauny Clause
MOTM July 2010 Winner
MOTM July 2010 Winner
Join Date: November 25, 2009
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
this are right on with the #'s my car made.
things are consistant
things are consistant
5/17/10, 10:01 AM
#9
V6 Member
Join Date: April 28, 2010
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
5/17/10, 10:04 AM
#10
Bullitt Member
5/17/10, 10:23 AM
#11
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: September 23, 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
5/17/10, 10:50 AM
#12
GT Member
Join Date: April 29, 2010
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
STD numbers are ALWAYS higher than SAE, simply because the formula "corrects" to a denser atmosphere.
Nice numbers. Noted the 3.73 gears, which should show very slightly less power at the wheels than a 3.31 car. With the exception of that first 395 RWHP report from Edmunds, the cars seem to be very, very consistent in their power delivery.
Nice numbers. Noted the 3.73 gears, which should show very slightly less power at the wheels than a 3.31 car. With the exception of that first 395 RWHP report from Edmunds, the cars seem to be very, very consistent in their power delivery.
5/17/10, 10:52 AM
#13
V6 Member
Join Date: April 28, 2010
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
STD numbers are ALWAYS higher than SAE, simply because the formula "corrects" to a denser atmosphere.
Nice numbers. Noted the 3.73 gears, which should show very slightly less power at the wheels than a 3.31 car. With the exception of that first 395 RWHP report from Edmunds, the cars seem to be very, very consistent in their power delivery.
Nice numbers. Noted the 3.73 gears, which should show very slightly less power at the wheels than a 3.31 car. With the exception of that first 395 RWHP report from Edmunds, the cars seem to be very, very consistent in their power delivery.
Shorter gears will read less on a dyno.
5/17/10, 11:06 AM
#14
lookin good man...
5/17/10, 12:04 PM
#20
V6 Member
Join Date: April 26, 2010
Location: bham al
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for posting the RPM plot.
Have you made any pulls in 4th? I don't care that the absolute numbers say, but I would like to see what happens after peak HP without the speed governor kicking in.
Have you made any pulls in 4th? I don't care that the absolute numbers say, but I would like to see what happens after peak HP without the speed governor kicking in.