2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

What about this ( negative ) review?

Old Apr 20, 2010 | 01:01 PM
  #41  
tvrbob's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: January 31, 2010
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Overboost
I still get the vibe that he's simply telling people who think the 3.7 will be equivalent to the outgoing 4.6 that the V8 still is the "performance" car, and the V6, even in PP trim is more of an economy/cruising car.
Why is it that I often feel my IQ instantly goes down ten points whenever I read this forum?
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2010 | 01:17 PM
  #42  
fritzOSU03's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 25, 2010
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by goldhillstang
Read Gene K's post above.
I completely agree with Gene K's post but I'm referring to the reviewer's comments that the car feels low on torque which happens to be in spite of the numbers. How could this one review be a total contradiction to everything else that has been written...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
radio
2010-2014 Mustang
24
Sep 17, 2016 03:37 PM
tj@steeda
'10-14 V6 Modifications
1
Sep 23, 2015 03:21 PM
carid
Vendor Showcase
0
Sep 10, 2015 08:31 AM
Detroit Steel
GT350
1
Sep 3, 2015 07:50 AM
C Moe
GT
0
Aug 11, 2015 01:58 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:58 AM.