Notices
2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By:

V6: $21,455

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1/8/10, 09:59 AM
  #41  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
RedCandy5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 9, 2008
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
In the right hands your right but the average driver will be running mid to high 14's all day. I have seen stock GT owners only mustering up mid 14's at the track.
Old 1/8/10, 04:46 PM
  #42  
Cobra R Member
 
97GT03SVT's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 26, 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DarkCandy08GT
In the right hands your right but the average driver will be running mid to high 14's all day. I have seen stock GT owners only mustering up mid 14's at the track.
The same can be said for a 87-93 5.0. To be honest my '87 bone stock was only a mid 14 sec car. Though it was still a little faster than my '97 it is still a far cry from a 14.00 or 13.7-9 time

I think the bottom line is that the new V6s are more than just cars with show and no go.
Old 1/9/10, 11:22 AM
  #43  
Bullitt Member
 
Dr Evil's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 17, 2007
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I expect the 11 v-6 to run right with the outgoing GT. Same HP, less weight. Lol at any of the old 5.0s running with the new six.

By the way, the only 5.0 weighing 3050 lbs was the notch.

Let's see:

80'/90s 5.0 3200/190 rwhp stock = 16.8 lbs/HP

2011 V6 3400lbs/250 rwhp = 13.6 lbs/HP

It's just math
Old 1/9/10, 05:41 PM
  #44  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Five Oh Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 14, 2007
Location: Pacific NW USA
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Dr Evil
I expect the 11 v-6 to run right with the outgoing GT. Same HP, less weight. Lol at any of the old 5.0s running with the new six.

By the way, the only 5.0 weighing 3050 lbs was the notch.

Let's see:

80'/90s 5.0 3200/190 rwhp stock = 16.8 lbs/HP

2011 V6 3400lbs/250 rwhp = 13.6 lbs/HP

It's just math
You are totally forgetting that it's torque that wins drag races, not hp. Old 5.0's were 300 lb ft, while the new 3.7 makes 280 lb ft. The new 3.7 weighs several hundred more pounds than a 5.0 from the 87-93 generation. So, let's review: old 5.0 has more torque and weighs less than new 3.7. It's just math.
Old 1/9/10, 06:07 PM
  #45  
eci
Banned
 
eci's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Five Oh Brian
You are totally forgetting that it's torque that wins drag races, not hp. Old 5.0's were 300 lb ft, while the new 3.7 makes 280 lb ft. The new 3.7 weighs several hundred more pounds than a 5.0 from the 87-93 generation. So, let's review: old 5.0 has more torque and weighs less than new 3.7. It's just math.
True, but important to remember the old 5.0's when stock were out of steam at 5,000 RPM. The area under the curve is very important. The 5.0 does not have a flat torque curve. The heads were awful. I'd wager the new V6 has more average torque than the old 5.0. Stock for stock.
Old 1/9/10, 06:47 PM
  #46  
I will buy Jack Stands!!!
 
mustangGT90210's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 13, 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 16 Posts
I see a drag race playing out this way:

Old 5.0 launches hard, gets probably a car on the 3.7, shifts into second, and the 3.7 is already gaining back, eventually completing the 1/4 in a quicker time, which I'd estimate to be a few tenths minimum. Horsepower plays a big part after the initial launch.
Old 1/9/10, 06:52 PM
  #47  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
RedCandy5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 9, 2008
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Who cares it still sounds like s***. Let the V6 hang with me, i have a better looking a** end and my car sounds like it has *****.
Old 1/9/10, 07:13 PM
  #48  
I will buy Jack Stands!!!
 
mustangGT90210's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 13, 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 16 Posts
Agreed. The V6 can be faster, but the sound can never back it up. Take my truck for example, straight 6, true duals, rumbles at idle and sounds really good, but it doesn't have that "it factor" or whatever of the 302 and 351 powered trucks exhausts. It sounds like a 6, but I really don't care, I love it all the same
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jsimmons
'10-14 V6 Modifications
236
9/26/23 11:38 AM
CiniZter
General Vehicle Discussion/News
25
4/28/16 05:41 PM
cdynaco
General Vehicle Discussion/News
17
11/4/12 12:27 AM
StangMahn
2005-2009 Mustang
33
9/23/07 10:24 PM
ManEHawke
General Vehicle Discussion/News
9
1/29/05 10:01 AM



Quick Reply: V6: $21,455



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:29 AM.