Question about square setup with 10" wide rims
#1
Question about square setup with 10" wide rims
There's a set of wheels I want to buy that are 19"x10" and I want to go with a square setup to maximize the life of my tires. I have a 2014 with the Brembo brakes. The wheels I want have a +48mm offset and back spacing of 7.39" and they're labeled as "rear only" on the website. Is there a specific reason these couldn't be used on the front, such as rubbing on suspension components or something? I've seen plenty of cars with 10" wide rims at all 4 corners so I know there are some that fit, but I don't know enough to know what makes or breaks them fitting on the rear but not the front.
#2
There's a set of wheels I want to buy that are 19"x10" and I want to go with a square setup to maximize the life of my tires. I have a 2014 with the Brembo brakes. The wheels I want have a +48mm offset and back spacing of 7.39" and they're labeled as "rear only" on the website. Is there a specific reason these couldn't be used on the front, such as rubbing on suspension components or something? I've seen plenty of cars with 10" wide rims at all 4 corners so I know there are some that fit, but I don't know enough to know what makes or breaks them fitting on the rear but not the front.
#4
Square setups aren't necessarily better or more efficient on tires. My rear tires are 315s and they'll wear out before the fronts, so I change them more frequently, but I change my fronts less than I would if I kept a square setup. It has a tendency to balance out eventually, and the wider rears give better traction with these cars. Some are much happier with the look of a staggered setup as well, and while I do like the look myself, it's not why I have what I do. I simply put the widest rubber on the wheels that I could fit under the car and still turn the wheel. I track mine and do high-speed runs, so the extra grip in the rear really helps. Was there a reason you were set on a square setup aside from appearance or tire wear?
#5
I mainly wanted a squared set up for the ability to rotate the tires and get what I thought would be more use out of them. But what you said makes sense. I do like the look of a staggered set up.
#8
There's a set of wheels I want to buy that are 19"x10" and I want to go with a square setup to maximize the life of my tires. I have a 2014 with the Brembo brakes. The wheels I want have a +48mm offset and back spacing of 7.39" and they're labeled as "rear only" on the website. Is there a specific reason these couldn't be used on the front, such as rubbing on suspension components or something? I've seen plenty of cars with 10" wide rims at all 4 corners so I know there are some that fit, but I don't know enough to know what makes or breaks them fitting on the rear but not the front.
It's not impossible. It just really depends on the wheel design. What wheels are they?
#9
Caveat: These are my findings and opinions, not an endorsement or assertion of the best, no compromise solution. Opinions will vary.
"Won't fit front" may just mean it won't clear the brakes. If you can afford to take the risk, or if you are certain your at least getting the two 19x10 rears, you can get one wheel and test fit f/r on one side. My track setup is 18x10 gt500 replicas with either 295/30 or 295/40 Hoosier r6, listed as rear only (got a great deal on the 40's so I took a risk). All I had to do was put about 7mm spacer in the front (plus the long arp studs) to clear the caliper. No clearance problems so far stock or even with ultralights/Koni's/MM plates. The 295/40 Hoosier is the tallest/widest I think I'd try on the front though.. No problems so far running spacers for the last 25,000 miles and north of 140mph at mid ohio.
When it's for fun and not for $$, I'd rather get 4 extra track days than spend 3x per wheel.
Your results may vary depending on wheel width and offset, you would need to get the right number on your own to fit your car/setup, but that's just a numbers game to figure out.
Cheap and quick, in a pinch, you can use washers to get the measurement for your spacer. Stack on three or five studs until the wheel and tire clears by 1/8" in a full rotation, do not go overboard, you do not have unlimited space at the top of the fender and back of the wheel well. DO NOT DRIVE with washers in there!
DO NOT use spacers without extended studs, the factory studs really have no room for reduced thread engagement.
"Won't fit front" may just mean it won't clear the brakes. If you can afford to take the risk, or if you are certain your at least getting the two 19x10 rears, you can get one wheel and test fit f/r on one side. My track setup is 18x10 gt500 replicas with either 295/30 or 295/40 Hoosier r6, listed as rear only (got a great deal on the 40's so I took a risk). All I had to do was put about 7mm spacer in the front (plus the long arp studs) to clear the caliper. No clearance problems so far stock or even with ultralights/Koni's/MM plates. The 295/40 Hoosier is the tallest/widest I think I'd try on the front though.. No problems so far running spacers for the last 25,000 miles and north of 140mph at mid ohio.
When it's for fun and not for $$, I'd rather get 4 extra track days than spend 3x per wheel.
Your results may vary depending on wheel width and offset, you would need to get the right number on your own to fit your car/setup, but that's just a numbers game to figure out.
Cheap and quick, in a pinch, you can use washers to get the measurement for your spacer. Stack on three or five studs until the wheel and tire clears by 1/8" in a full rotation, do not go overboard, you do not have unlimited space at the top of the fender and back of the wheel well. DO NOT DRIVE with washers in there!
DO NOT use spacers without extended studs, the factory studs really have no room for reduced thread engagement.
#10
John, I used same reasoning as you when I was selecting my track weekend wheel/tire setup. Maybe not quite what you had in mind, but I have a square 275/40-19 setup on 19x9.5 wheels on my 2014 GT TP, and it works very well. No rubbing, and much more grip all around compared to stock Pirellis. As a matter of fact when the pirelli's are done, I want to replace them with 275/40-19 AS tire on stock Brembo wheels.
If you're running stock TP suspension there won't be a benefit to running staggered setup. You'd have to get a Boss rear sway bar to get the benefit of more traction on the back end. Our cars were set up for a square setup, so to maintain a the factory balance of oversteer/understeer I wanted to stay square as well.
EDIT: I just noticed in your signature you mention Roush lowering springs. I'm on stock springs, and with 275/40 I have just a fraction of an inch of clearance to the fender wall at full rotation. I'm not sure how that will translate when lowered.
If you're running stock TP suspension there won't be a benefit to running staggered setup. You'd have to get a Boss rear sway bar to get the benefit of more traction on the back end. Our cars were set up for a square setup, so to maintain a the factory balance of oversteer/understeer I wanted to stay square as well.
EDIT: I just noticed in your signature you mention Roush lowering springs. I'm on stock springs, and with 275/40 I have just a fraction of an inch of clearance to the fender wall at full rotation. I'm not sure how that will translate when lowered.
Last edited by 5.M0NSTER; 9/7/14 at 09:31 AM.
#11
I was debating the same situation here because I have the Pirelli's just sitting in the garage. I put installed Michelin Pilot Sport A/S + tires in 275/40/19 on the Brembo wheels on the stock TP suspension. I like the ride and the ability to drive year round, even in Germany. I like the balance with a square set-up. I was going to change to 18x10 wheels and go 285 squared for summer/track days but I don't know yet. For now this works for me. I have driven on the Nurburgring and in the snow and they do well as long as you don't expect them to be a Super Sport or Winter tire.
#12
The wheels I had planned on buying are the American Muscle 2013 GT500 replicas in black. For whatever reason, that color in 19x10 is on clearance for $129/ea. the 19x9.5s are still regular price at $174/ea and the 19x8.5s won't fit on the front due to the Brembos. I was also hoping to use my current 255/45 Pirellis (according to Tire Rack, the Track Pack Pirellis fit an 8.5-10" rim) on the new wheels until they need to be replaced and then go with a little wider.
#13
The wheels I had planned on buying are the American Muscle 2013 GT500 replicas in black. For whatever reason, that color in 19x10 is on clearance for $129/ea. the 19x9.5s are still regular price at $174/ea and the 19x8.5s won't fit on the front due to the Brembos. I was also hoping to use my current 255/45 Pirellis (according to Tire Rack, the Track Pack Pirellis fit an 8.5-10" rim) on the new wheels until they need to be replaced and then go with a little wider.
#14
I was debating the same situation here because I have the Pirelli's just sitting in the garage. I put installed Michelin Pilot Sport A/S + tires in 275/40/19 on the Brembo wheels on the stock TP suspension. I like the ride and the ability to drive year round, even in Germany. I like the balance with a square set-up. I was going to change to 18x10 wheels and go 285 squared for summer/track days but I don't know yet. For now this works for me. I have driven on the Nurburgring and in the snow and they do well as long as you don't expect them to be a Super Sport or Winter tire.
Last edited by 5.M0NSTER; 9/7/14 at 05:38 PM.
#15
The wheels I had planned on buying are the American Muscle 2013 GT500 replicas in black. For whatever reason, that color in 19x10 is on clearance for $129/ea. the 19x9.5s are still regular price at $174/ea and the 19x8.5s won't fit on the front due to the Brembos. I was also hoping to use my current 255/45 Pirellis (according to Tire Rack, the Track Pack Pirellis fit an 8.5-10" rim) on the new wheels until they need to be replaced and then go with a little wider.
#16
I prefer a square setup as well. My recent thread about running 9.5" wide wheels with 275 width tires all around may interest you as well:
https://themustangsource.com/forums/...5-tire-531430/
https://themustangsource.com/forums/...5-tire-531430/
Last edited by VIP1; 9/7/14 at 11:48 PM.
#17
I have the SVE drifts in 19x9.5 with 275/40/19
With steeda sport springs 1 1/4" lower in front 1 1/2" lower in rear, no rube, and I just tracked my car for the first time with this setup Saturday, no rubbing and worked great!
With steeda sport springs 1 1/4" lower in front 1 1/2" lower in rear, no rube, and I just tracked my car for the first time with this setup Saturday, no rubbing and worked great!
#18
I'm also in the same situation. I have the stock 9x19 wheels that came in with my '11 GT Brembo package, they have +42 offset. I'm planning to move to a squared 19x10. I will like to know if I could move to a +45 or +48 offset without any risks like steer harder, steering linkage deflection, failure of wheel bearings, need of extra toe in to compensate, will not fit with Brembo brakes, etc?
I already saw the 19x10 AMR's (+48 offset) & SVE series 2 that might fit all around.
My actual tires size is 275/40r19 squared, no rubbing and not any single issue, on the future going for 285/35R19's also squared.
I already saw the 19x10 AMR's (+48 offset) & SVE series 2 that might fit all around.
My actual tires size is 275/40r19 squared, no rubbing and not any single issue, on the future going for 285/35R19's also squared.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
9/8/15 10:45 AM