Notices
2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By:

New Rear lower fascia

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12/28/09, 03:48 PM
  #1  
Bow Chica Bow Wow
TMS Staff
Thread Starter
 
burningman's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Location: Proudly in NJ...bite it FL
Posts: 7,442
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
New Rear lower fascia

Not sure if this has been said yet..as i'm uber lazy today and don't want to search but looks like that black 2011 has a new lower rear fascia.
It appears Ford is trying to loose a bit of diaper by making the sweep up a bit faster in the center.
A small step in the right direction for sure.
Old 12/28/09, 03:49 PM
  #2  
eci
Banned
 
eci's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep, looks better fo' sho'!
Old 12/28/09, 03:49 PM
  #3  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
SteelTownStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 1, 2006
Posts: 2,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The change definitely improved its appearance...
Old 12/28/09, 03:51 PM
  #4  
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
 
MARZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree, the rear end looks much better than the outgoing GT's backside, which now appears on the 2011 V6.
Old 12/28/09, 03:52 PM
  #5  
GTR Member
 
Twin Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 18, 2006
Location: England
Posts: 5,553
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Yep, it's nice. Best shot of it so far

Old 12/28/09, 03:56 PM
  #6  
MOTM Committee Member
 
stangfoeva's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 17, 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 9,181
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
It is much improved. I still prefer the gt500 or the steeda q550 rear bumper, but this one will be fine until I get the money to mod
Old 12/28/09, 05:41 PM
  #7  
NJ3
Mach 1 Member
 
NJ3's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 9, 2005
Location: Chesapeake, Va.
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I don't see that much of a difference.
2011

2010

Last edited by NJ3; 12/28/09 at 05:44 PM.
Old 12/28/09, 05:46 PM
  #8  
Cobra R Member
 
Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 12, 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NJ3
I don't see that much of a difference.
Some vents were added between exhaust tips. Reminds me of the rear fascia on a C5 corvette.
Old 12/28/09, 06:12 PM
  #9  
Legacy TMS Member
 
laserred38's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,047
Received 166 Likes on 141 Posts
Tires/wheels are noticeably wider. The exhaust looks more "tucked". Not to mention the new diffuser. But **** those new rear headrest stick up a LOT. Luckily they fold down, if not they would surely block a LOT of the rear window.
Old 12/28/09, 06:13 PM
  #10  
eci
Banned
 
eci's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by laserred38
Tires/wheels are noticeably wider. The exhaust looks more "tucked". Not to mention the new diffuser. But **** those new rear headrest stick up a LOT. Luckily they fold down, if not they would surely block a LOT of the rear window.
You're looking at the front headrests.


Tires look like 255's to me.
Old 12/28/09, 06:17 PM
  #11  
Legacy TMS Member
 
laserred38's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,047
Received 166 Likes on 141 Posts
These are the rear headrests. The new "required" rear headrests.

I agree though, looks like 255s. Although you can get 255s now on the Track Pack, and these look a little wider. Maybe 265s?
Attached Thumbnails New Rear lower fascia-2011_new_wheel_3.jpg  
Old 12/28/09, 06:22 PM
  #12  
eci
Banned
 
eci's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by laserred38
These are the rear headrests. The new "required" rear headrests.

I agree though, looks like 255s. Although you can get 255s now on the Track Pack, and these look a little wider. Maybe 265s?
Could be, Ford could fit a 255 on an 8.5", if the rim is 9" on the track pack that would make sense.
Old 12/28/09, 07:15 PM
  #13  
GT Member
 
Novelty goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 7, 2007
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure I like the new diaper any better than the old one. The new one is actually a little fussier.
Old 12/28/09, 07:33 PM
  #14  
Cobra R Member
 
Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 12, 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by eci
Tires look like 255's to me.
The 2011 photo is at a different angle which would make the tires naturally look wider.
Old 12/28/09, 07:52 PM
  #15  
FR500 Member
 
PTRocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 1, 2008
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Adam2004
The 2011 photo is at a different angle which would make the tires naturally look wider.
I am not certain if the rear tires are wider, but the track definitely appears to be. The plane of outer face of the rim appears to be a lot closer to the inside lip of the wheel opening. I presume this is due to the wheel offset required to clear the Brembos.
Old 12/28/09, 08:05 PM
  #16  
Cobra R Member
 
2010MustangGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 11, 2009
Posts: 1,774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MARZ
I agree, the rear end looks much better than the outgoing GT's backside, which now appears on the 2011 V6.
I actually disagree. (to an extent.)
While the slots are cool n' all, they're non functional. Right? Actually, I think they're just grooves and not slots at all. Anyone confirm this? They're the same thing as the hood scoop... Plus I believe it sticks out an extra inch or so because the exhaust and rocker panel are just about flush.

Plus I kinda don't know what to look at first. The round cap, round exhaust, concave truck lid, the vertical lights, horizontal lines on the bottom... AS it was there were already a lotta shapes goin on. I prefer the clean, less cluttered one (2010). Tho I do like the gt500's the most, because it flows more so with the back. having vertical theme to them (matches the lights) - if that makes sense. Plus that diffuser is a safe bet, as it's been done before; the F430, DBS, SL63, (Camaro...) and the like. And actually, I can't think of any other car with horizontal bumper slots... some have grates, some are flush, some are vertical diffusers. But none are horizontal slots... that I can think up anyways.

IDK, call me biased but, I just don't see how 4, 6 inch by 2 inch (whatever the dimension is...) marks make people be in such awe and wonderment of the new fascia... Like it really didn't change it, it just added more to look at.

BTW this slot setup wasn't retro inspired was it? Meaning this is solo representative of the 2011, and no other previous Gen.



Huge pic:
Old 12/28/09, 08:06 PM
  #17  
NJ3
Mach 1 Member
 
NJ3's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 9, 2005
Location: Chesapeake, Va.
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by PTRocks
I am not certain if the rear tires are wider, but the track definitely appears to be. The plane of outer face of the rim appears to be a lot closer to the inside lip of the wheel opening. I presume this is due to the wheel offset required to clear the Brembos.
Looking at the spec sheet, http://media.ford.com/images/10031/2...g_GT_Specs.pdf ,there is an optional 19 x 9.0 wheel that's part of the Brembo package, so I would think the tires would be 255's.

Last edited by NJ3; 12/28/09 at 08:08 PM.
Old 12/28/09, 08:10 PM
  #18  
Team Mustang Source
 
montreal ponies's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PTRocks
I am not certain if the rear tires are wider, but the track definitely appears to be. The plane of outer face of the rim appears to be a lot closer to the inside lip of the wheel opening. I presume this is due to the wheel offset required to clear the Brembos.
Lookwise, you definately wider tires with the trackpack to give it that bad *** look from behind. Also, it still has that 4x4 look that i don't like. suspension and tires would be my first mods.
Old 12/28/09, 08:16 PM
  #19  
Team Mustang Source
 
montreal ponies's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NJ3
Looking at the spec sheet, http://media.ford.com/images/10031/2...g_GT_Specs.pdf ,there is an optional 19 x 9.0 wheel that's part of the Brembo package, so I would think the tires would be 255's.
With those 9" rwheels, you need at the very least 275's to fill in the wheelwells.
Old 12/29/09, 03:20 AM
  #20  
Cobra R Member
 
tom_vilsack's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 7, 2004
Location: Ladner,Canada
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by laserred38
Tires/wheels are noticeably wider. The exhaust looks more "tucked". Not to mention the new diffuser. But **** those new rear headrest stick up a LOT. Luckily they fold down, if not they would surely block a LOT of the rear window.

when they fold down...do they just stick foward or do they fold flush?



Quick Reply: New Rear lower fascia



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:25 AM.