Massive 2013 GT500 Allocation Cut??
#21
Originally Posted by Storm75
I hope this helps ease the concern:
My Mustang club held its May meeting at Ford World HQ in Dearborn and a number of Ford executives spoke to us. These guys were the heavy-hitters; Dave Pericak, Mark Fields, Bill Ford and others. Several of them spoke of the 2013 Shelby GT500 and they assured our group of the following...
1) they will build every one they have an order for...
2) they will continue to build the Shelby in its present form even after the re-designed Mustang hits the world in April 2014
The Detroit press has also repeated the above two points in follow-up interviews - rest easy friends!
My Mustang club held its May meeting at Ford World HQ in Dearborn and a number of Ford executives spoke to us. These guys were the heavy-hitters; Dave Pericak, Mark Fields, Bill Ford and others. Several of them spoke of the 2013 Shelby GT500 and they assured our group of the following...
1) they will build every one they have an order for...
2) they will continue to build the Shelby in its present form even after the re-designed Mustang hits the world in April 2014
The Detroit press has also repeated the above two points in follow-up interviews - rest easy friends!
#22
Storm75,
So they can change my allocation from 2013 to 2014 and still claim "well, your car was built"?
Ford simply can't claim "they will build every one they have an order for..." because if that was the case then the whole "allocation system" wouldn't exist. There are plenty of people that say they are still waiting for an allocation even they have put their order in!
So they can change my allocation from 2013 to 2014 and still claim "well, your car was built"?
Ford simply can't claim "they will build every one they have an order for..." because if that was the case then the whole "allocation system" wouldn't exist. There are plenty of people that say they are still waiting for an allocation even they have put their order in!
Last edited by UOP Shadow; 9/17/12 at 12:02 PM.
#23
I hope this helps ease the concern:
My Mustang club held its May meeting at Ford World HQ in Dearborn and a number of Ford executives spoke to us. These guys were the heavy-hitters; Dave Pericak, Mark Fields, Bill Ford and others. Several of them spoke of the 2013 Shelby GT500 and they assured our group of the following...
1) they will build every one they have an order for...
2) they will continue to build the Shelby in its present form even after the re-designed Mustang hits the world in April 2014
The Detroit press has also repeated the above two points in follow-up interviews - rest easy friends!
My Mustang club held its May meeting at Ford World HQ in Dearborn and a number of Ford executives spoke to us. These guys were the heavy-hitters; Dave Pericak, Mark Fields, Bill Ford and others. Several of them spoke of the 2013 Shelby GT500 and they assured our group of the following...
1) they will build every one they have an order for...
2) they will continue to build the Shelby in its present form even after the re-designed Mustang hits the world in April 2014
The Detroit press has also repeated the above two points in follow-up interviews - rest easy friends!
Last edited by UOP Shadow; 9/17/12 at 12:06 PM.
#25
#26
Originally Posted by UOP Shadow
Are you saying they'll only build the 2014 MY cars for 4 months?
#27
Originally Posted by UOP Shadow
There is a difference between when the vehicle will be announced & when it will be built / available. The new 2015 Mustang will be "announced" in April 2014, NOT delivered in showrooms. My guess is, they won't be building the 2015s until after that date. If they still have valid 2014 GT500 orders, they should continue building them throughout the time that Ford is still building 2014 MY cars. I could see fewer 2014 GT500 allocations to ensure that they get all of them built by the time the line has to switch over to the 2015 MY Stangs.
I can almost guarantee they won't be building two different platform based Mustangs on the same line at the same time.
#28
Mach 1 Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: September 10, 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wouldn't be surprised if they stop accepting orders for GT500s spring/early summer 2013 which would allow them to build all remaining orders then shut down GT500 production until the 2015 starts. Everyone who put an order in would get a 2013/2014 GT500 which will be the exact same car. Then i assume they would stop GTs and V6s a bit after. Based on the marketing cycle for this car i would think 2015 production will start march 2014 at the latest. Ford needs to get these cars onto lots for the mustang's prime selling season which is spring/summer.
#30
Absolutely, but if you think they'll come in over a weekend and totally convert the plant to build the 2015, you're mistaken. 2014MY cars will start rolling off the line in early 2013, and we may see the production 2015 car in April 2014. After that, it may be a short amount of time between reveal and production, given the nature of the vehicle and history.
For example; the machine that stamps out a fender for a 2014 Mustang can be changed over within 2 hours to start stamping a fender for a 2015 Mustang. Or even an Explorer or other model.
The trick is, the main assy line components don't change, just the parts that travel along change.
Why not? Ford did it with the 2004 F150. They offered the new body style as well as the old body stlye which they called the "heritage edition." As long as there are enough parts to build the PY models, it's pointless not to build them. Ford doesn't want a whole bunch of inventory sitting around their factory. Even though their factory is JIT, they don't want any unecessary extra parts laying around. That's just dollars thrown into the wind.
#31
Mach 1 Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: March 20, 2011
Location: Bremen, Indiana
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Overboost
Yeah...not buying that last part. That would certainly be new territory for Ford.
#32
If you've never been to an assembly plant, you'd be surprised at how quickly they can change over a line. The beauty of the assembly-line type process is its flexibility for quick change-overs. All the shuttles for moving parts / vehicles down the line are universal to be used across multiple platforms.
For example; the machine that stamps out a fender for a 2014 Mustang can be changed over within 2 hours to start stamping a fender for a 2015 Mustang. Or even an Explorer or other model.
The trick is, the main assy line components don't change, just the parts that travel along change.
For example; the machine that stamps out a fender for a 2014 Mustang can be changed over within 2 hours to start stamping a fender for a 2015 Mustang. Or even an Explorer or other model.
The trick is, the main assy line components don't change, just the parts that travel along change.
Why not? Ford did it with the 2004 F150. They offered the new body style as well as the old body stlye which they called the "heritage edition." As long as there are enough parts to build the PY models, it's pointless not to build them. Ford doesn't want a whole bunch of inventory sitting around their factory. Even though their factory is JIT, they don't want any unecessary extra parts laying around. That's just dollars thrown into the wind.
I would be willing to bet a large amount of money that if Ford has slated X number of GT500's for the 13-14 model, they'll build them. Stay tuned to the dealers to see what the deal is with the situation.
#34
Six sigma is an over-priced joke! You're better off paying more for good quality tooling up front than having to hire a bunch of geeks to over-analyze process variables and chasing moving targets. In the long run, a company that skimps on tooling $ will also skimp on optimizing processes & poka yoke opportunities.
I think that's why at the last Ford Supplier conference I went to, they told us to forget about Six Sigma. Ford wants "zero defects." They don't care how you develop / control your process, just don't ship them any bad parts. If you do, it's CS2 for you. And that's no fun.
I've never been to FRAP. How many lines do they run there?
I think that's why at the last Ford Supplier conference I went to, they told us to forget about Six Sigma. Ford wants "zero defects." They don't care how you develop / control your process, just don't ship them any bad parts. If you do, it's CS2 for you. And that's no fun.
I've never been to FRAP. How many lines do they run there?
Last edited by UOP Shadow; 9/17/12 at 08:27 PM.
#35
Six sigma is an over-priced joke! You're better off paying more for good quality tooling up front than having to hire a bunch of geeks to over-analyze process variables and chasing moving targets. In the long run, a company that skimps on tooling $ will also skimp on optimizing processes & poka yoke opportunities.
I think that's why at the last Ford Supplier conference I went to, they told us to forget about Six Sigma. Ford wants "zero defects." They don't care how you develop / control your process, just don't ship them any bad parts. If you do, it's CS2 for you. And that's no fun.
I've never been to FRAP. How many lines do they run there?
I think that's why at the last Ford Supplier conference I went to, they told us to forget about Six Sigma. Ford wants "zero defects." They don't care how you develop / control your process, just don't ship them any bad parts. If you do, it's CS2 for you. And that's no fun.
I've never been to FRAP. How many lines do they run there?
FRAP is running one shift right now, but it's only one main line. I'm not familiar with the other Ford assembly plants, but you follow one main build sequence in there, without any spur lines (that I noticed).
#36
I Have No Life
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Different situation.
At that time, the F150 was built at IIRC 3 different plants (Oakville being one of them)
When the 2004 came out and they had a different model year, it was final build outs in Oakville until that plant section was closed (and eventually demo'd) and they built the heritage there (V6s only)
Now I'm just guessing here but,
I don't know if that had anything to do with the CAW and having to keep that plant open for a certain time past the changeover to the 2004.
I'm guessing at that time there was no way they were going to retool for the 2004 knowing that the truck plant was going to be nuked.
At that time, the F150 was built at IIRC 3 different plants (Oakville being one of them)
When the 2004 came out and they had a different model year, it was final build outs in Oakville until that plant section was closed (and eventually demo'd) and they built the heritage there (V6s only)
Now I'm just guessing here but,
I don't know if that had anything to do with the CAW and having to keep that plant open for a certain time past the changeover to the 2004.
I'm guessing at that time there was no way they were going to retool for the 2004 knowing that the truck plant was going to be nuked.
Last edited by Boomer; 9/17/12 at 10:02 PM.
#37
Shelby GT500 Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
The initial build for the GT500 was for 4200 units. Ford pushed it to 4800 units but has since revised that back to 4200. I got this info this morning from the GM of my local dealer...