July Muscle Mustangs & Fast Fords
but more info would be helpful, like mph
at least we know the 12.6 was done on the all-season tires
I haven't seen the article but being MMFF I am about 99.9% sure of Evan driving the car.
A 12.6 on a 2.06 60ft time is serious. If the track prep was a little better they might have seen 12.4s if they got a good 1.9 60ft on those stock tires.
Evan had to be shifting the **** out of that thing.
A 12.6 on a 2.06 60ft time is serious. If the track prep was a little better they might have seen 12.4s if they got a good 1.9 60ft on those stock tires.
Evan had to be shifting the **** out of that thing.
There is no difference in the GT's and C/S other then the front and rear bumper. The C/S actually has the GT500 rear bumper.
The only thing you can not get on the c/s is the Brembo brakes.
Last edited by jay45dee; May 20, 2010 at 02:26 PM.
I think the reason he stated better times could be had with a non CS/GT is the non brembo skinnier meats. One would stand to reason that the wider summer tires of the Brembo package would net a slightly faster time with the same driver same day etc..
Evan Smith at MM&FF magazine ran a bone stock 07/09 GT500 to the tune of 12.25 in the 1/4 mile. I think the trap speed was 116??? The vast majority that I've seen at the tracks in person, though, struggle for traction on the factory tires and typically run high 12's to low 13's. Heck, I even saw one yahoo blaze the tires badly and run in the 14's! With this much power, you have to run drag radials or better - otherwise, you're just wasting your time at the dragstrip.
Wheels Up!
Last edited by Topnotch; May 21, 2010 at 08:49 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AMWill
Vendor Showcase
0
Jul 21, 2015 02:39 PM
AMWill
Vendor Showcase
12
Jul 20, 2015 08:40 AM
AMWill
Vendor Showcase
0
Jul 16, 2015 04:26 PM
AMWill
Vendor Showcase
0
Jul 8, 2015 05:33 PM





