Job 2 Change to 2011 Mustang GT?
5/10/10 | 06:23 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
Joined: August 28, 2006
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Job 2 Change to 2011 Mustang GT?
"If you're in the market for a 5.0, try to get one of the Job 1 cars. After 6 months they're supposed to switch to cast iron exhaust manifolds as a part of cost savings."
Can anyone substantiate or refute this?
These are almost a work or art..........
Can anyone substantiate or refute this?
These are almost a work or art..........
Once the fuel is burned, it's just as important to get the exhaust gases out of the engine as it is to get air in. With this in mind, the 5.0 has tubular stainless steel exhaust headers. The design of the headers features two secondary tubes that flow into two primary tubes, which then flow into a common collector. The tube lengths are tuned to ensure that there are no exhaust pulses pushing gases back into adjacent cylinders. Engineer Adam Christian developed the headers using a CFD program, but when the design was sent out to a local prototype shop for fabrication, the parts performed poorly on the dyno. After seeing the results, Christian requisitioned some tubing, took it home and fabricated a set of headers using his own tools. These performed perfectly on the engine and were used to correlate the model. The production units are being supplied to Ford by Benteler Automotive.
Last edited by GT_350; 5/10/10 at 07:10 PM.
5/10/10 | 06:26 PM
#2
Member
Joined: April 25, 2010
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
My brother is in Ford management and informed me these "cost savings" are also rumored to cost the new production 5.0's about 6 hp..........
...
....
....
....
...
5/10/10 | 06:36 PM
#6
Member
Joined: May 2, 2010
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: CT
I think the Job 1 headers are kind of neat - unique looking !!
5/10/10 | 06:47 PM
#10
Mach 1 Member
Joined: March 29, 2007
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
The Tri-Y design the stock 5.0 headers use is good for a street car. You're right. They offer good mid and upper RPM power without sacrificing low RPM power. 4 into 1 headers would be better.
5/10/10 | 06:59 PM
#12
Legacy TMS Member
Joined: February 8, 2004
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 7
From: Cincinnati, OH
After all the time spent extolling the virtues of the header set-up, I think this seems a bit unlikely, given that costs for this arrangement was factored into the engineering and production equation (at least according to what was shared in the 5.0 magazine article).
Last edited by Tony Alonso; 5/10/10 at 07:36 PM.
5/10/10 | 07:25 PM
#13
V6 Member
Joined: April 9, 2010
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Really? So they are going to pay to have molds made for cast manifolds when they already have someone making thousands of the current manifold most likely at a better cost then the cast ones would be? I highly doubt that. Move this to the rumor section please...
JJ
JJ
ITS TIME TO
5/10/10 | 07:45 PM
#16
Post *****
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
After all the time spent extolling the virtues of the header set-up, I think this seems a bit unlikely, given that costs for this arrangement was factored into the engineering and production equation (at least according to what was shared in the 5.0 magazine article).
Right. They covered performance and even how they countered warpage at the head.
Could that have been why some were held? Exhaust leaks or weld cracks?
5/10/10 | 08:04 PM
#18
Member
Joined: April 25, 2010
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
It's hilarious how ridiculous this board has become.... The fact that some of you believed my above statement if only for a second is soo pathetic...
Stop with all this BS, when are these forums going to become a source for REAL information once again.
5/10/10 | 08:15 PM
#19
Bullitt Member
Joined: September 9, 2009
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
I for 1 have gotten lots of very useful info from TMS. And it usually turns out to be accurate.Mods, please delete this abomination...
5/10/10 | 08:25 PM
#20
V6 Member
Joined: April 9, 2010
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
