2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

Insurance comparo 2010 4.6 - 2011 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 10:02 AM
  #1  
deepc285's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: January 22, 2010
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Insurance comparo 2010 4.6 - 2011 5.0

Anyone check into insurance premium quotes for the new 5.0 --> a previous posted stated his almost DOUBLED ! He also stated good driving record w/ multi car discount. I myself got rid of an old 2002 base F-150 thrasher truck. My insurance went up only 15 bucks a month (2010, 4.6, standard insur. $250 deductable) Of course I'm 47, married, cln record, multi...
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 10:09 AM
  #2  
Skotty's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 18, 2010
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
From: KC, MO
A good question many should consider. I haven't looked yet myself, since it won't stop me from buying one. I am curious however, so will probably look it up before long.

It will be different for each person...many factors to consider. Age, history, gender, marital status, company, whether or not you have multiple policies. Company can make a surprising difference sometimes, so you might check other companies if your current company has an unreasonable rate. I was with a company once that wanted to charge me over 1K every six months for a second car I had purchased. I switched to Geico and it only cost me about 250 every six months for the same car, same coverage.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 10:25 AM
  #3  
Falchion's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: October 12, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 1
The 2011 GT is so new I'm not even sure they'll have it in there system to work up a quote?
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 10:35 AM
  #4  
eci's Avatar
eci
Banned
 
Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
BS on it doubling. I went from a Mustang GT to a GT500 and my yearly premium only went from $900 to $1050 on a full coverage policy with 250k/250k/500k limits.

Underwriters rate on type of car, number of cylinders, cost of car, things like that. They don't say "OH man the 2010 has 315HP and this here new fangled 2011 has 412, we better jack up the rates!"

Last edited by eci; Mar 24, 2010 at 10:40 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 10:41 AM
  #5  
IT_Guru's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: March 3, 2010
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
From: Niles, Mi
My quote was $550 every six months. 32 yrs old, multi car multi policy discount. No points or at faults.
for 2011 GT Premium.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 10:41 AM
  #6  
xlover's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 10, 2009
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Originally Posted by eci
BS on it doubling. I went from a Mustang GT to a GT500 and my yearly premium only went from $900 to $1050 on a full coverage policy with 250k/250k/500k limits.

Underwriters rate on type of car, number of cylinders, cost of car, things like that. They don't say "OH man the 2010 has 315HP and this here new fangled 2011 has 412, we better jack up the rates!"
most of that was probably just the increase in value too. prolly 25k insurance valuation on the used GT to 50k on the new gt500

mine only went up about 200 going from 07 fusion to 10 GT. note i am 25

Last edited by xlover; Mar 24, 2010 at 10:43 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 10:56 AM
  #7  
eci's Avatar
eci
Banned
 
Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by xlover
most of that was probably just the increase in value too. prolly 25k insurance valuation on the used GT to 50k on the new gt500

mine only went up about 200 going from 07 fusion to 10 GT. note i am 25
Exactly. A V8 is a V8. They don't rate on horsepower. The big things are:

1. Class ( sportscar, sedan, etc )
2. # of cylinders
3. Replacement cost
4. Number of doors
5. Number of driven wheels

The HP difference between an SVT and Mustang GT has absolutely zero to do with the premium. Same with a 2010 to 2011 GT.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 11:01 AM
  #8  
PTRocks's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: July 1, 2008
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 0
From: Oxford, UK
Another factor insurance companies have just started to consider is a person's credit rating. Given the state of the economy, it wouldn't surprise me if this plays a factor for some people.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 11:03 AM
  #9  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
I got a friend in insurance and I asked him to get me a quote today, I'll post the results when I get them.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 11:05 AM
  #10  
eci's Avatar
eci
Banned
 
Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by PTRocks
Another factor insurance companies have just started to consider is a person's credit rating. Given the state of the economy, it wouldn't surprise me if this plays a factor for some people.
As they should! A credit rating is a very good indicator of a persons' level of responsibility in ALL ASPECTS of their life.

We do credit checks before we employ people. A person with a 500 score is going to be a lousy employee, guaranteed.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 11:17 AM
  #11  
PTRocks's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: July 1, 2008
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 0
From: Oxford, UK
Originally Posted by eci
As they should! A credit rating is a very good indicator of a persons' level of responsibility in ALL ASPECTS of their life.

We do credit checks before we employ people. A person with a 500 score is going to be a lousy employee, guaranteed.
That's probably not a lock, but it's pretty close. I can think of a number of mitigating circumstances where people would be getting punished unfairly.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 11:17 AM
  #12  
Skotty's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 18, 2010
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
From: KC, MO
Originally Posted by eci
As they should! A credit rating is a very good indicator of a persons' level of responsibility in ALL ASPECTS of their life.

We do credit checks before we employ people. A person with a 500 score is going to be a lousy employee, guaranteed.
Mostly true, perhaps, but not in all cases. For example, a person who doesn't use credit will generally have a low credit score. Doesn't say anything to their level of responsibility. Credit scores are geared more towards "how profitable will you be to creditors".
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 11:20 AM
  #13  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Originally Posted by eci
Exactly. A V8 is a V8. They don't rate on horsepower. The big things are:

1. Class ( sportscar, sedan, etc )
2. # of cylinders
3. Replacement cost
4. Number of doors
5. Number of driven wheels

The HP difference between an SVT and Mustang GT has absolutely zero to do with the premium. Same with a 2010 to 2011 GT.
I'd say AGE/Experience is a big one, but not necessarily reflective of the car itself.

I remember being under 25 at the time when the Mach1 came out and the difference between a V6 which I drove at the time, and the GT was within a couple hundred of each other.
The Mach1 was the same as the GT, no difference what so ever.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 11:22 AM
  #14  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
I gotta say I'm not looking forward to hearing my quote. I got a good driving record, credit, etc. but I'm still young. 22 FTL
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 11:24 AM
  #15  
karman's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: January 4, 2006
Posts: 3,904
Likes: 32
Originally Posted by PTRocks
That's probably not a lock, but it's pretty close. I can think of a number of mitigating circumstances where people would be getting punished unfairly.
Yeah in general it is true, but there are always exceptions to the rule.
A low credit score is not a "guaranteed" lousy employee, just probable.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 11:26 AM
  #16  
eci's Avatar
eci
Banned
 
Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Boomer
I'd say AGE/Experience is a big one, but not necessarily reflective of the car itself.
Yeah, that's actually the biggest part. I was just referring to the vehicle.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 11:27 AM
  #17  
eci's Avatar
eci
Banned
 
Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by karman
Yeah in general it is true, but there are always exceptions to the rule.
A low credit score is not a "guaranteed" lousy employee, just probable.
I should have added "if the information true". Obviously I lot of people had identities stolen etc.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 11:28 AM
  #18  
eci's Avatar
eci
Banned
 
Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by stangfoeva
I gotta say I'm not looking forward to hearing my quote. I got a good driving record, credit, etc. but I'm still young. 22 FTL
I paid $300 a month for a 1992 5.0 back in 92!
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 11:32 AM
  #19  
Skotty's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 18, 2010
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
From: KC, MO
Age is the biggest factor, and gender usually plays a big role too. When I was young, I was paying about 3x what I do now, and back then I had an old beater with the minimum possible insurance, whereas now I have fully insured cars that are fairly new. And that doesn't even take inflation into account. Other strange factors can have some impact on insurance as well...things you would never even think about. Like whether or not you live in a trailer home. I used to work in insurance, and I always felt some of their rating factors were unethical...they just were not illegal.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 11:33 AM
  #20  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by eci
I paid $300 a month for a 1992 5.0 back in 92!
I'll probably get something similar to that. He quoted me at like $220 for the 2010
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:02 PM.