Here is your Chance to Influence 2010 Aftermarket Restyle Option

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Sep 13, 2008 | 06:04 PM

#21

fastmover05

Bullitt Member

Joined: July 10, 2007

Posts: 279

Likes: 0

From: Denver

YEAH YEAH YEAH!!!! those tailights look amazing!!! +1 for sure!!! Also, how bout spoiler options!?!?!

Sep 13, 2008 | 06:07 PM

#22

fastmover05

Bullitt Member

Joined: July 10, 2007

Posts: 279

Likes: 0

From: Denver

especially the one with the blackout panel!!!!

Sep 15, 2008 | 09:27 AM

#23

AWmustang

Cobra Member

Joined: October 12, 2004

Posts: 1,188

Likes: 7

From: Milwaukee, WI

You guys that want to blackout the reverse lights.... you need to have reverse lights. Where are you planning they go?

Sep 15, 2008 | 09:37 AM

#24

TMSBrad

The Mustang Source FOUNDER

Joined: January 29, 2004

Posts: 9,890

Likes: 11

From: Vestavia Hills, Ala.

Quote:

Originally Posted by AWmustang

You guys that want to blackout the reverse lights.... you need to have reverse lights. Where are you planning they go?

Same place they are now; in the inner cells.

And they should make sequentials standard. I've never understood why the inner cells are virtually useless.

Sep 15, 2008 | 01:08 PM

#25

sgt d

Bullitt Member

Joined: September 14, 2008

Posts: 381

Likes: 0

From: texan in the ghanistan

Quote:

Originally Posted by TMSBrad

Sequential LED taillights with a sharp concave crease ala 1967-1968 with paintable dividers between the cells. Smooth rockers

the black rear panel is a good looking addition, much better than the panels created for the new edge and s197. looks more like it was meant to be there. just my .02

james

Sep 15, 2008 | 01:14 PM

#26

429 Boss Mustang

Mach 1 Member

Joined: May 12, 2008

Posts: 529

Likes: 0

From: Oklahoma

i just want a 5.0 with 400 hp lol xD

Sep 15, 2008 | 01:22 PM

#27

sgt d

Bullitt Member

Joined: September 14, 2008

Posts: 381

Likes: 0

From: texan in the ghanistan

^^ it will be nice to have a 5.0 again, all though the 5.0 name will be whored out as a marketing tool but it leaves me asking a few questions. being a punched out modular 4.6, what compression ratio will it be at to get the target 400? what will this leave as options for a power adder and will ford have it tuned to the gills in order to make that power? rumor mill but i have read that because of these things dodge has limited the potential of the srt8 challenger, again just what i have read.

Sep 15, 2008 | 01:24 PM

#28

429 Boss Mustang

Mach 1 Member

Joined: May 12, 2008

Posts: 529

Likes: 0

From: Oklahoma

i dont think it will be a part of the mod famly last time i checked ask boomer

Sep 15, 2008 | 02:28 PM

#29

fastmover05

Bullitt Member

Joined: July 10, 2007

Posts: 279

Likes: 0

From: Denver

how bout some quarter window louvers that dont tape on.....i just cant stand the thought of losing one of them after a few years. i know everyone uses them and they work fine im just saying it would be nice to have some that dont tape onto the car...

Sep 15, 2008 | 02:41 PM

#30

SuperSugeKnight

Mach 1 Member

Joined: March 29, 2007

Posts: 766

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by 429 Boss Mustang

i dont think it will be a part of the mod famly last time i checked ask boomer

It's based on the 5.4L but nothing from the Modular family will bolt up.

Sep 15, 2008 | 02:48 PM

#31

429 Boss Mustang

Mach 1 Member

Joined: May 12, 2008

Posts: 529

Likes: 0

From: Oklahoma

ok thanks knight
is it gonna be a 4 valve?

Sep 15, 2008 | 02:51 PM

#32

sgt d

Bullitt Member

Joined: September 14, 2008

Posts: 381

Likes: 0

From: texan in the ghanistan

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperSugeKnight

It's based on the 5.4L but nothing from the Modular family will bolt up.

now see i have not heard that one, it does make more sense however. room for growth and it will not be capped out from the factory.. it is funny how the internet rumors run around, in the end you never have proof until it is in your garage.

Sep 15, 2008 | 02:55 PM

#33

429 Boss Mustang

Mach 1 Member

Joined: May 12, 2008

Posts: 529

Likes: 0

From: Oklahoma

lol yep seems that way

Sep 15, 2008 | 04:51 PM

#34

RCSignals

Cobra Member

Joined: October 27, 2007

Posts: 1,380

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by krnpimpsta

they can't be functional, because you can see the regular fuel cap on the side of the un-camo'd pics.

Aside from the fact that they are on the trunk lid.

Sep 15, 2008 | 04:54 PM

#35

RCSignals

Cobra Member

Joined: October 27, 2007

Posts: 1,380

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by FLAstangx3

Aren't the 2010's to be equiped with sequential's? Definately need stealth cornerlamps. Possibly aftermarket add on backup lamps. Somewhere other than between the tail lamp set up, and of course new lenses for the rear to go with it. Also some sort of "smooth" plug, for the deck lid, if they come with SIRIUS. The turtle on the lid is the dumbest thing yet that FORD has done. My T-Bird, has it UNDER the lid. Works perfect. And possibly a Quarter Scoop up high, vs in the "C". Like the 69's.

I've heard they will have sequentials. Standard or option I don't know.

I agree about the SAT RAD antenna. Although on teh trunk lid is better than the huge ones others but on the roof.

Sep 15, 2008 | 04:57 PM

#36

SuperSugeKnight

Mach 1 Member

Joined: March 29, 2007

Posts: 766

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by AWmustang

You guys that want to blackout the reverse lights.... you need to have reverse lights. Where are you planning they go?

The black out on the lights would have to be transparent. Like a tint, so light can still shine thru.

Sep 15, 2008 | 05:02 PM

#37

stangfoeva

MOTM Committee Member

Joined: April 17, 2006

Posts: 9,201

Likes: 2

From: SoCal

Quote:

Originally Posted by TMSBrad

Same place they are now; in the inner cells.

And they should make sequentials standard. I've never understood why the inner cells are virtually useless.

Sequentials would be great standard

Sep 15, 2008 | 05:53 PM

#38

Ice Hawk

2010 Mustang Winner!

Joined: December 3, 2007

Posts: 713

Likes: 0

From: Orlando, Florida

Quote:

Originally Posted by RCSignals

I agree about the SAT antenna. Although on the trunk lid is better than the huge ones others put on the roof.

I agree. Chevy is really bad at that.

Sep 16, 2008 | 12:03 PM

#39

SilverHorse-----Racing

Legacy Tms Member

Joined: January 9, 2005

Posts: 2,037

Likes: 2

Quote:

Originally Posted by sgt d

the black rear panel is a good looking addition, much better than the panels created for the new edge and s197. looks more like it was meant to be there. just my .02

james

Already in the works

We're also gearing up our blackout pieces for the 05-09 cars to match to the honeycomb panel now, and a couple other tricks up our sleeves - should be fun!