the good old argument about oil change
I'm still waiting for someone to give me a logical explanation as to why 5W 20 is the go too choice oil when Ford recommends 5W 50 for their 5.0 ,302 engine. If 5W 20 flows so much better for the newer tight engine specs then why is Ford recommending 5W 50 oil? That's really thick oil for all those tight specs that everybody talks about! So again, if Ford recommends this thick a$$ oil 50 weight with the 5.0 and also recommends a 20 weight with the same 5.0 302 engine, then why would 5W 30 weight not work just as well?
Last edited by 2011 Kona Blue; Jan 31, 2014 at 07:57 PM.
Yes, but let's be honest here. Nobody here knows the answer to my posted question. The car manufactures didn't want to get charged with fines by not keeping CAFE regulations so they decided to recommend 5W 20 so they would comply. Its that simple. 5W 20 is not horrible but 5W 30 will provide the perfect lubrication for our engines. Use 5W 30 weight and a base IV fully synthetic oil and you can beat the ball snot out of the engine and the oil will not shear much and keep your engine in great shape
Last edited by 2011 Kona Blue; Jan 31, 2014 at 08:08 PM.
You are more then likely correct. I also doubt that Ford could very much tell the difference in an engine failure if you used 5w30 and it would not be the cause of the issue anyway. Not sure what I am going to use next time I change the oil but I wouldn't have a problem putting 5W30 in it if the same engine in a track pack car had 5W50.
You are more then likely correct. I also doubt that Ford could very much tell the difference in an engine failure if you used 5w30 and it would not be the cause of the issue anyway. Not sure what I am going to use next time I change the oil but I wouldn't have a problem putting 5W30 in it if the same engine in a track pack car had 5W50.
So why does two Ford mustang 5.0's have different oil weight recommendations when they are the same identical engine? How can you say mustang A is great for 5W50 weight. Yet mustang B is great for 5W 20 weight so you need too use that because its printed on the cap. Yet both A and B have the same identical engine components. So what does your 40 years of Ford experience give to a logical explanation too this?
Changing the oil at 5,000 is the best choice, and no more than 5000 thereafter. But you really need to run 5W-20 oil if that is what is on the cap, you will find that many people say it dont matter, and they are 100% incorrect. These are not push rod engines, the timing components MUST have the correct oil used. Timing can be changed with the incorrect wait of oil. People are going to say I am crazy, but trust me with over 40 years of ford experience. Hope this helps.
I think reading the thread will do you some good. That 40 yrs experience is not going to help you with 2013 tech. Ford stamped 5-20 on the cap of the mainstream gt for better fuel and emissions. It saved them millions. But 5-30 is a better choice for motor protection.
Go by the Oil Life Monitor, which takes into account factors like this. 7,500 is not too many miles at all, depending on the usage. Here's a couple oil analysis I had done on my car: https://themustangsource.com/f726/1s...5/#post6736762
An OIL Life monitor is put in for people who have not a clue on maintenance, they should not be used as they do not measure the oil viscosity.
Incorrect - Honda has gone to 0W-20, as has Toyota apparently. Can only imagine how up in arms you guys would be if Ford went there
http://mobile.vehicleservicepros.com...ic-oil-changes And yes, Ford is in the business of making money - you do that by not having motors fail just out of warranty.
http://mobile.vehicleservicepros.com...ic-oil-changes And yes, Ford is in the business of making money - you do that by not having motors fail just out of warranty.Ford has been nice enough to create such a great motor that it can safely handle a range of oil weights.
Since I drive so little, my personal choice is to have "more" protection and "worse" economy.
A) this is a FORUM which is used to learn regardless of how repetitive it is. If you're tired of the topic, there are THOUSANDS of other threads to visit.
B) this is probably one of the best oil threads I've seen. Why? Because aside from the unproductive childish comments here and there, it houses a culmination of the best opinions, data, logic, analysis, and discussion as opposed to digging all around at dozens of threads that mostly consist of childish and unproductive people. Fortunately we have been able to keep most of that out. And hopefully a mod will swing in soon and see all the good info and put a stop to all the other OFF TOPIC bs.
Lol... I already called it back when this was on page 1, 4 posts in. As others have stated, all this info is same regurgitated info that's been discussed over and over again. Any oil thread posted by someone with less than 100 posts should be closed by the mods and links given to existing oil threads.





Big ol fat women... nom nom nom